Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Tubular VS Stock manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2004, 04:46 PM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
marksae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the misconception a lot of people have is that stock is not good. In our case, stock is pretty damn good! If Buschur can go mid-11s on a stock turbo, exhaust manifold, and turbine housing, it shows that our stock parts aren't restrictive at all. IMO, spending $1000+ for a tubular exhaust manifold and o2 housing for our stock turbos is not worth it. We might be able to get another 5-10whp by changing those parts, but we can also gain 5-10whp or more from better tuning.

It sucks when we, the consumer, have to buy parts and find out whether or not they work. I do not like spending my own money to do R&D on my car. I wish shops would just do all the testing to find out what works and what doesn't. I think some shops have, but just don't want to publish the results as it will probably hurt sales.
Old Jul 12, 2004, 04:51 PM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Jadiem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
I think in some respects your right.. Ceramic coating will help that since retaining the heat means more expanding gasses, and therefore using that energy to assist spooling the turbo.. I think when your dealing with modifications like this, its all about combination, in and of itself, the aftermarket manifold may offer very little, but combine it with a Stainless O2 housing, Cams, ported head, better flowing manifold, etc.. you will find the gains to be fairly substantail since it only serves to reduce one possible restriction..

On a normally aspirated engine, tube diameter, length and collector diameter contribute to the ability of the engine to scavange (draw more exhaust out of the engine) I can see this being somewhat valid also on a turbocharged engine, however the nature of a turbocharged engine means that there's less of a likelyhood that leftover exhaust gasses in the combustion chamber can contaminate the new charge.. So pairing it with a better cam combination, and lowered restrictions on a less restrictive exhaust manifold could result in better gains than not using the aftermarket manifold.

Now, here's the rub.. Its not necessarily cost effective to do all this optimization to get to apower level that can be attained by a turbo upgrade.. But what you don't sacrifice by going this route is drivability and other compromises. Not to mention, there are some racing classes that prevent you from changing the engines displacement, or using larger turbos.. this would not apply to this route.
so basically he saying do cams instead/before you spend your money there (stock turbo withholding)
Old Jul 12, 2004, 05:03 PM
  #18  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
 
MalibuJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 10,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
I think your money would be better spent on Cams and tuning.. I think optimizing the intake tract, and cylinder head will offer more gains.. once you get to that point, then the gains of an aftermarket exhaust manifold and O2 housing would be more wortwhile.. I'd honestly NEVER spend $1000 on an exhaust manifold though.. $500 is about the max..
Old Jul 12, 2004, 05:18 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
ez76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: bay area
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by marksae
I think the misconception a lot of people have is that stock is not good. In our case, stock is pretty damn good! If Buschur can go mid-11s on a stock turbo, exhaust manifold, and turbine housing, it shows that our stock parts aren't restrictive at all. IMO, spending $1000+ for a tubular exhaust manifold and o2 housing for our stock turbos is not worth it. We might be able to get another 5-10whp by changing those parts, but we can also gain 5-10whp or more from better tuning.
Personally I'm not expecting as much from the manifold as what I got from cams (that cost roughly the same), but it's an attractive piece from the perspective of someone who's looking to upgrade to an ATP turbo kit later on and doesn't mind upgrading the manifold now (though an O2 housing would not be reusable).
Old Jul 12, 2004, 05:24 PM
  #20  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboMaestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quickshift
Check out the borla header. Ceramic coated and equal length . I ordered mine from evostore.com this is a pic from them
http://store2.yimg.com/I/yhst-6811299808595_1799_939244
Cant beat the million mile warrentte from borla .
This may sound stupid, but I don't like the fact that the borla unit is segmented and welded....more places to fail...The ones I want to get are one piece, at least the tubular part is...
Old Jul 12, 2004, 05:25 PM
  #21  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboMaestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by marksae
I think the misconception a lot of people have is that stock is not good. In our case, stock is pretty damn good! If Buschur can go mid-11s on a stock turbo, exhaust manifold, and turbine housing, it shows that our stock parts aren't restrictive at all. IMO, spending $1000+ for a tubular exhaust manifold and o2 housing for our stock turbos is not worth it. We might be able to get another 5-10whp by changing those parts, but we can also gain 5-10whp or more from better tuning.

It sucks when we, the consumer, have to buy parts and find out whether or not they work. I do not like spending my own money to do R&D on my car. I wish shops would just do all the testing to find out what works and what doesn't. I think some shops have, but just don't want to publish the results as it will probably hurt sales.
Hey, did you check the picture of my header? Think that's worth $450-$500? looking for feedback...
Old Jul 12, 2004, 06:02 PM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
marksae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TurboMaestro
Hey, did you check the picture of my header? Think that's worth $450-$500? looking for feedback...


That's a nice looking header. For $450-500, I'd say it's worth it for looks alone. Are all the runners one piece? If so, that's a sweet piece. Who makes it?
Old Jul 12, 2004, 06:06 PM
  #23  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboMaestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by marksae


That's a nice looking header. For $450-500, I'd say it's worth it for looks alone. Are all the runners one piece? If so, that's a sweet piece. Who makes it?
Well, it's made by a company in Taiwan, and distributed by me. All the runners are one piece, they actually have a mandrel machine that bends super thick stainless. Check out the thickness of the flange
http://home.comcast.net/~brianmsmothers/flanges.jpg

Last edited by TurboMaestro; Jul 12, 2004 at 06:10 PM.
Old Jul 12, 2004, 06:11 PM
  #24  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboMaestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really didn't want to turn this into an ad, I really want to know if these manifolds are even worth getting.......yeah I know, no one has them on their car, so who knows.....hence the super general question...
Old Jul 12, 2004, 06:15 PM
  #25  
Newbie
 
Fevo7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Piedmont NC
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not 100% sure on this one...but from the HONDA side of this......tubulars, especially stainles tubalar crack easier. Like it was said before, before you spend the money on tubular.....get something that puts out my HP.
Old Jul 12, 2004, 06:16 PM
  #26  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
 
MalibuJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 10,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
There are measurable gains from these headers, but its value is purely subjective, its not going to be the huge bang for the buck that a full exhaust system, or a boost controller might offer.. Its more of an optimization for what is there.. Its likely that the more you have upgraded, the more value it will have. It certainly wouldn't be the first bolt-on that I tried.. But I have an entire combo that I'll be installing, Stainless header, Titanium Evo VII RS2 Turbo, and Stainless O2 housing.. I think as a combo it should be great on the street.. But also keep in mind I have 272 cams, injectors, intake manifold, and a ported head that will be going on this car too.. Not to mention all of the Buschur components through stage 4..
Old Jul 12, 2004, 06:24 PM
  #27  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
 
MalibuJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 10,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
The thing about stainless headers and cracking is that it can crack at the welds, so you have to look for one with as few welds as possible, and the welds that do exist, should be full penetration and have been welded with the correct methods to prevent contamination (causing the welds to become brittle)

The picture you show is of a good quality manifold.. But its hard to tell the thickness.. The big problem with turbo manifolds is the weight they support.. If you do not want your manifold to crack, you will have to support the weight of the turbo in some way, also you should consider using a downpipe with a flex section this way the weight of the exhaust system, or just the rigidity of the downpipe and the movement of the engine isn't stressing the welds.. I created brackets to support the turbo's weight which rests against the engine block so its weight and movement shouldn't allow it to stress the header.. It won't completely eliminate the possibility of cracking, but simple things do help..
Old Jul 12, 2004, 06:27 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I've been running the DNP manifold on my DSM for almost 2 years now, daily driven, and it is fine. The manifold is very high quality and is made of thick-walled 321 stainless steel, not the cheaper 304 stainless like others have. In my opinion, if you want to go equal-length tubular stainless, make sure it is thick-walled and 321 instead of 304.

Here is a picture of my setup almost 2 years ago before I installed it:



Eric

Edit: Also, I would highly recommend to get the manifold coated to keep the engine bay temps down. I had to fab my own heat shield to help since I didn't coat mine.

Last edited by l2r99gst; Jul 12, 2004 at 06:30 PM.
Old Jul 12, 2004, 06:27 PM
  #29  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TurboMaestro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
The thing about stainless headers and cracking is that it can crack at the welds, so you have to look for one with as few welds as possible, and the welds that do exist, should be full penetration and have been welded with the correct methods to prevent contamination (causing the welds to become brittle)

The picture you show is of a good quality manifold.. But its hard to tell the thickness.. The big problem with turbo manifolds is the weight they support.. If you do not want your manifold to crack, you will have to support the weight of the turbo in some way, also you should consider using a downpipe with a flex section this way the weight of the exhaust system, or just the rigidity of the downpipe and the movement of the engine isn't stressing the welds.. I created brackets to support the turbo's weight which rests against the engine block so its weight and movement shouldn't allow it to stress the header.. It won't completely eliminate the possibility of cracking, but simple things do help..
Oh I know the thickness is sufficient. I would figure TIG welds at the flanges would hold up pretty good....but then again I have never run a stainless manifold...
Old Jul 12, 2004, 06:31 PM
  #30  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
 
MalibuJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 10,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Like the previous post said, its also the type of stainless too.. I forgot to even mention that.. I'm not even certain what the JIC manifold runs, though I think its also 321 stainless..


Quick Reply: Tubular VS Stock manifold



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:40 AM.