evo 8 > wrx sti corners
#1
evo 8 > wrx sti corners
what makes the evo 8 outperform the wrx / wrx sti in the corners?
any guys with sti oem suspension work knowledge compared to evo suspension , they both weigh almost same, any insight
any guys with sti oem suspension work knowledge compared to evo suspension , they both weigh almost same, any insight
#2
I think it has alot to do with the bushings used in the suspension...and an Evo has stiffer shocks/springs/roll bars which also help. I believe the stock evo tires are stickier than the stock sti tires, although not by much.
#3
i think it has a lot to do with the wheelbase of the evo
wider/longer is better for handling in very simular cars
subaru sti
Wheelbase 99.4
Length 173.8
Width 68.5
Height 56.3
evolution
Wheelbase (in.): 103.3
Length (in.): 178.5
Width (in.): 69.7
Height (in.): 57.1
and in the evo, the weight feels better distributed to the wheels.
wider/longer is better for handling in very simular cars
subaru sti
Wheelbase 99.4
Length 173.8
Width 68.5
Height 56.3
evolution
Wheelbase (in.): 103.3
Length (in.): 178.5
Width (in.): 69.7
Height (in.): 57.1
and in the evo, the weight feels better distributed to the wheels.
Last edited by burningmoney97; Nov 19, 2004 at 12:26 AM.
#4
Originally Posted by burningmoney97
i think it has a lot to do with the wheelbase of the evo
wider/longer is better for handling in very simular cars
subaru sti
Wheelbase 99.4
Length 173.8
Width 68.5
Height 56.3
evolution
Wheelbase (in.): 103.3
Length (in.): 178.5
Width (in.): 69.7
Height (in.): 57.1
and in the evo, the weight feels better distributed to the wheels.
wider/longer is better for handling in very simular cars
subaru sti
Wheelbase 99.4
Length 173.8
Width 68.5
Height 56.3
evolution
Wheelbase (in.): 103.3
Length (in.): 178.5
Width (in.): 69.7
Height (in.): 57.1
and in the evo, the weight feels better distributed to the wheels.
What he said.... and also, the steering ratio. The steering ratio on the Evo is "quicker".
- Jason
#6
The driver?? that makes no sense if the same driver dives both cars. That was a stupid answer.
I dont know how good the us models EVO go against STi. But in Japan Auatralia and the UK the technology in ACD and AYC is far greater to the DCCD in the STI.
That is a major reason. Though there are others.
I dont know how good the us models EVO go against STi. But in Japan Auatralia and the UK the technology in ACD and AYC is far greater to the DCCD in the STI.
That is a major reason. Though there are others.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Steiner
Uh the driver.
- Jason
#9
Originally Posted by evo8oz
The driver?? that makes no sense if the same driver dives both cars. That was a stupid answer.
I dont know how good the us models EVO go against STi. But in Japan Auatralia and the UK the technology in ACD and AYC is far greater to the DCCD in the STI.
That is a major reason. Though there are others.
I dont know how good the us models EVO go against STi. But in Japan Auatralia and the UK the technology in ACD and AYC is far greater to the DCCD in the STI.
That is a major reason. Though there are others.
#11
I was just messing around. I think the wider wheelbase and shorter steering ratio are the biggest reasons why. From all I've read it sounds like the '05 STi with its wider rims and tires is pretty much even now with the Evo. In all honesty guys, 99.9% of Evo owners will never push their car that extra c*nt hair of difference that it has over the STi. I think both cars outhandle most of their owners.
#12
1. Biggest difference is the tires. Period.. plus the EVO comes with 235 vs Sti 225 width tires.
2. More balanced suspension, less prone to understeer compared to the STi thus providing higher grip. The EVO actually has comparable spring rates to the STi but harsher set shocks.
3. Quicker ratio steering, approx 13:1 EVO compared to approx 15:1 STi
4. It is possible that the EVO MR/RS with aluminium roof has a lower "center of gravity" thus helping with turning
Both cars have stiff chasis and the STi actually has a tighter curb to curb turning radius. 34ft compared to 37ft, I think ... corrent me if I am wrong guys ...
2. More balanced suspension, less prone to understeer compared to the STi thus providing higher grip. The EVO actually has comparable spring rates to the STi but harsher set shocks.
3. Quicker ratio steering, approx 13:1 EVO compared to approx 15:1 STi
4. It is possible that the EVO MR/RS with aluminium roof has a lower "center of gravity" thus helping with turning
Both cars have stiff chasis and the STi actually has a tighter curb to curb turning radius. 34ft compared to 37ft, I think ... corrent me if I am wrong guys ...
Last edited by DaWorstPlaya; Dec 13, 2004 at 01:21 PM.