EVOLust

Sup all,

Dunno if you guys pick the latest SCC mag yet but, here's an interesting article for ya. Sorry about the quality. I'm new to editing this sort of stuff.

djmikeymike

iTrader: (1)

there was alot of evo stuff in that mag.........but F ssc for the sti better then evo

nrcooled

iTrader: (4)

spec-c being better then an FQ-300

Not really a fair fight if you ask me but I would think that the STi would be better anyway. The Spec-c is much more focused of a car then the FQ300 would ever be.

GOKOU

iTrader: (2)

It's about time someone said something!!!

Jonny Bananas

sweet ****

Willie Dynamite

iTrader: (17)

This is a repost. There are making fun of the guy who is a member.

4G63>OOOO

iTrader: (1)

Good, he was a whiner anyway.

Karash

iTrader: (6)

Hey man you cannot dis the Spec-C, that is how the STi should have been. Its the 2.0 engine and not the 2.5. It has way better handling...etc etc. Don't be a hater

RuEvolved

Yea I think that one of the guys at SCC is a URABUS and SRT4 lover. They alawies bring up how great they are and how wonderful they are to drive...but they did put the EVO as the #1 sport compact of all time.thats a pretty big compliment

Maybe there equal opportunity and maybe there just forgetful...who knows.

eclipsegs2k1

yeah, well it doesn't matter which one they thought was better since we don't get the FQ-330 or the Spec-C in the US. If we did though, I'd take the FQ everytime.

Willie Dynamite

iTrader: (17)

The FQ and Spec C were UK spec cars I do belive, not JDM.

ex-honda

Heard that a watered down spec -C is coming to our soil to rival the MR.

aras

spec c still lost on the track by MR and 5 speed GSR in japan by about 4 car length.

YellowFever

iTrader: (24)

what month is this SCC issue?

Willie Dynamite

iTrader: (17)

Current issue, JAN. '05