MR FQ400 top gear time (forget the other thread)
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MR FQ400 top gear time (forget the other thread)
sorry...got it right this time.
1min 24.8 secs ...video on the way...can anyone host it?
it rips apart a murcielago....but suffers a bit from turbo lag
1min 24.8 secs ...video on the way...can anyone host it?
it rips apart a murcielago....but suffers a bit from turbo lag
#6
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It did in the sense that the 400 cost 47k, and the murcialago cost 160k....it was pushing it through all the corners, and not losing it on the straights.
and bearing in mind the lambo was driven by a touring car driver and the evo was driven by....well.....jeremy clarkson
and bearing in mind the lambo was driven by a touring car driver and the evo was driven by....well.....jeremy clarkson
Last edited by Kyl3cook; Dec 12, 2004 at 12:25 PM.
#7
Evolving Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(sigh) Jeremy isnt a bad driver, he has spent countless hours driving that course, yes the lambo was driven by a BTCC driver, but I doubt he had time to get used to the car or the track.
It was a good comparison of the two cars....I suspect in actual life on a road the FQ would be way behind....you saw what happen when it was off-boost in the hammerhead.
I really like the evo and it think its great that a 4 door family saloon can go that quick,heck I'm going to buy an RS
oh and while I admire for making the FQ400 I think they should of approached it another way.
Andy
It was a good comparison of the two cars....I suspect in actual life on a road the FQ would be way behind....you saw what happen when it was off-boost in the hammerhead.
I really like the evo and it think its great that a 4 door family saloon can go that quick,heck I'm going to buy an RS
oh and while I admire for making the FQ400 I think they should of approached it another way.
Andy
Trending Topics
#8
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah...the FQ500 which they were originally going to build ...I think on a typical a road (not straight motorways), as long as you knew how to drive on boost, the 400 would walk a murcielago
#15
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HOST THE GOD DAMN VIDEO GOD DAMNIT. DAMNIT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BTW i'd still take the lambo, too pimp and I doubt the FQ could crack the 200MPH mark like that lambo that hits 212....
The Lambo is not a 0-60 car, its a 160++++ car....
BTW i'd still take the lambo, too pimp and I doubt the FQ could crack the 200MPH mark like that lambo that hits 212....
The Lambo is not a 0-60 car, its a 160++++ car....