DDDEVO

iTrader: (1)

Was curious to see how aggressive/conservative the flashes are from these two companies. Seems like the TT flashed cars put out more power than the Dynoflashed ones do, with both having similar mods.

UT_Evo

iTrader: (5)

This is probably gonna get deleted so fast...but I'd take a custom tune that's less aggressive and gives me 5 less whp that's A LOT safer on my engine...but that's just my uneducated .02

DynoFlash

iTrader: (91)

There are dozens upon dozens of actual dyno sheets posted in my section of the forums for your review and comparision

haystak

ive got a dynoflash and i think its a tad to rich but safe al might make leaner on reguest i dont know im getting cams this weekend so ill be looking for a new tune too

titaniumkingpin

iTrader: (10)

i've had both TT and Dynoflash re-flash my ECU. TT tune was strong but it also gave me Random Misfire P0300 code. Got re-flashed by Al and no more CEL. It was only a through the mail so im sure its conservative.
In no way am i saying your going to get a P0300 after TT tune. It was just my expierence.

DynoFlash

iTrader: (91)

I do tune on the rich side for safey and reliability.

I have no problem making your tune a bit leaner and I can offer you a free reflash for your cams at the same time.

DDDEVO

iTrader: (1)

Thanks for the input, will definately go with a custom tune dynoflash as I was leaning that way anyway, just wanted to see which one is "safer" for the engine, in terms of reliability. Al, as soon as I get my Evo, I will get a 3" TBE, custom tuned dynoflash from you ( can't wait ), and a MBC. That's pretty much it, just want my Evo to have a liitle attitude!!!!

haystak

ill give you another try before i go else where

blonde

iTrader: (12)

i could have sworn that i locked a thread just like this one only 10 mins ago....

please run a search next time. closed...