Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

350whp WITHOUT Cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2005, 09:57 PM
  #31  
Newbie
 
CarbonKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tke_413
All depends, I just put the 264/264's in and went from 295.9 to 342.8 and it pulls like a damn train in any gear (especially 3rd).
47 hp just from the 264's? ....c'mon
Old Apr 3, 2005, 09:58 PM
  #32  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
WHTEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
HA. on what dyno, that land and sea crap? thats rediculous power for those few mods, LIKE REDICULOUS
dynojet
Old Apr 3, 2005, 09:58 PM
  #33  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Iceman2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Schaumburg IL
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hearing those gains with 264's wants me to get cams now..
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:01 PM
  #34  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
WHTEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Very unlikely...those numbers aren't even likely with those mods using RACE gas. If I can pick up 110whp with those basic bolt-ons, I'll be quite the happy camper.
well you guys believe what you want to. those are my numbers with those mods.
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:03 PM
  #35  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
rlazer5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haha, UT_EVO, i know how u feel. I just wanted to stop with my current mods and only add a downipe and high-flow cat, but reading all these crazy HP gains with cams and a custom tune convinced me into doing the same. Hopefully u can withdstand the temptation, lol.....
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:05 PM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
gsujeff55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
well, its quite unbelievable man. you couldn't even run more than 22psi and were probably knocking at that. my guess is your dyno COLORADO correction factor was having a VERY bad day.
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:06 PM
  #37  
Evolving Member
 
dave9172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: bel air, md
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i know ive seen that a bigger fuel pump is reccomended when adding cams, what about bigger injectors?
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:08 PM
  #38  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
gsujeff55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no, you don't need bigger injectors. when you upgrade the turbo, you need to upgrade the injectors.

fuel pump is really just a safety measure as the stocker has failed in the past.
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:08 PM
  #39  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Iceman2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Schaumburg IL
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i am sorry too man but with just that mods you cant possibly get 350whp. it would be nice to get that much horses with just those mods, it more of a 315-325whp range
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:09 PM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
inariv5573's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cherry Hill, N.J.
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Of course not, but then again I'm not trying to reach 350-380whp without cams.
You have a point there.
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:10 PM
  #41  
Evolving Member
 
dave9172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: bel air, md
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im lookin to get hks 264/264 soon! cant wait
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:11 PM
  #42  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Iceman2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Schaumburg IL
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think reasonably speaking cams give you abt 30-35whp.
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:13 PM
  #43  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
gsujeff55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
na, more like 15-20whp.
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:13 PM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
WHTEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
well, its quite unbelievable man. you couldn't even run more than 22psi and were probably knocking at that. my guess is your dyno COLORADO correction factor was having a VERY bad day.
i am running 24 psi actually. anything above that and i was out of the turbos efficiency range and was just losing power. this place has dynoed an uncountable number of cars including as many evos as most of the big dsm shops out there. their correction factors are just about right. read a post by a friend of mine "3240" about dyno numbers and correction factors. he dynos his car up here and also at or near sea level where he gets all his work done on his car and the numbers were right.
Old Apr 3, 2005, 10:15 PM
  #45  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by WHTEVO
i am running 24 psi actually. anything above that and i was out of the turbos efficiency range and was just losing power. this place has dynoed an uncountable number of cars including as many evos as most of the big dsm shops out there. their correction factors are just about right. read a post by a friend of mine "3240" about dyno numbers and correction factors. he dynos his car up here and also at or near sea level where he gets all his work done on his car and the numbers were right.
24 should be out of the efficiency range already.


Quick Reply: 350whp WITHOUT Cams



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 AM.