Who has the fastest / quickest street legal evo, without using NOS?
Apr 28, 2005, 05:09 PM
#32
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by damien ramirez
Why would Al brag about how someone else piloted his car to a faster time.
BTW - I drove my own car that day in the WRX vs. EVO shootout - winning 1st Place and going 10.28 @ 139
After the race I asked Kevin Lawson to try my car and he went 10.18 @ 141.8
He is a much better driver than me and is a professional drag racer so I would expect him to get some good times
Apr 28, 2005, 05:11 PM
#33
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mike 99gsx
#1. The original question was "Who has the fastest/quickest STREET LEGAL EVO, without NOS? Neither of these cars are close to street legal if we want to get technical (slicks, open exhausts ETC...)
#2 Kevin Lawson drove Al's car to a 10.18, not Al.
#2 Kevin Lawson drove Al's car to a 10.18, not Al.
I drive it on the road all the time and totally enjoy the experience
and it has a normal 3" Buschur exhuast
Apr 28, 2005, 05:13 PM
#34
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: dublin, oxford, chillicothe OH
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just don't see where they "trivalized your hardwork" by making a simple statement of posting their time and your time, while their time was faster.
Not trying to start anything, but I believe you're the one who downplayed their hardwork by calling BS on an otherwise legit time.
This is all IMO. Not trying to start a tuner battle, I'm just looking at it as I see it.
Not trying to start anything, but I believe you're the one who downplayed their hardwork by calling BS on an otherwise legit time.
This is all IMO. Not trying to start a tuner battle, I'm just looking at it as I see it.
Apr 28, 2005, 05:17 PM
#35
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
My car has current registartion, insurance, full interior including stereo and power sterring and DOT approved tires
I drive it on the road all the time and totally enjoy the experience
and it has a normal 3" Buschur exhuast
I drive it on the road all the time and totally enjoy the experience
and it has a normal 3" Buschur exhuast
Apr 28, 2005, 05:21 PM
#38
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SilverEvo8owner
I just don't see where they "trivalized your hardwork" by making a simple statement of posting their time and your time, while their time was faster.
Not trying to start anything, but I believe you're the one who downplayed their hardwork by calling BS on an otherwise legit time.
This is all IMO. Not trying to start a tuner battle, I'm just looking at it as I see it.
Not trying to start anything, but I believe you're the one who downplayed their hardwork by calling BS on an otherwise legit time.
This is all IMO. Not trying to start a tuner battle, I'm just looking at it as I see it.
I really dont care about all of this - its a joke to me how some shop is claiming a non NOS record with a NOS bottle in the car
My car is going faster very soon.
The semanitics and number bending will end soon enough.
Apr 28, 2005, 05:22 PM
#39
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by westchester evo
I also think his 667 hp was with an ALKY kit , am I correct ????
Now I use the same alcohol kit I sell to my customers
Its obviously a great advantage
Apr 28, 2005, 05:25 PM
#41
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Just FYI - the 667 whp from Turbo magazine was on staight gas
Now I use the same alcohol kit I sell to my customers
Its obviously a great advantage
Now I use the same alcohol kit I sell to my customers
Its obviously a great advantage
Apr 28, 2005, 05:25 PM
#42
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by westchester evo
Oh so the car did not go a 10.1 on just motor.. mmmm a power enhancer.....
Apr 28, 2005, 05:26 PM
#43
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mike 99gsx
I wish I could understand why you feel a time slip should be * when nitrous is involved yet you can justify alcohol injection as no big deal
The main reason why I am running it is to show what it can do
BTW - just for future refernce - the AMS car has alcohol injection also
Apr 28, 2005, 05:29 PM
#44
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't see how this could possibly even be a topic for debate! 10.11 > 10.18 end of story. You may "feel" that your car is the fastest without nos- but the time slips say otherwise.
Future races may hold different results- but as of today you're no. 2.
Future races may hold different results- but as of today you're no. 2.
Apr 28, 2005, 05:31 PM
#45
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I recall you made 622 on pump and alky. And 667 on alky and race gas and I hope some people can agree.....
So again AL.. at the race when you went a 10.18 was that with Alky also ?????
So again AL.. at the race when you went a 10.18 was that with Alky also ?????