Your opinions on "MIVEC"?
#1
Your opinions on "MIVEC"?
What do u guys think about the new "MIVEC" for the EVO IX iyo? I am curious to see what kind of power the Evo IX will make compared to the current EVO VIII! Specially after adding cams. Im guessing that if its the same thing that the STi has with variable valve timing it will be a problem tunning the car specially after cams bc i see alot of STI's having tunning problems bc of this. So what do u guys think? Would u keep the Evo 8 or trade for a IX for the "MIVEC"
#4
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Meridian, ID
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i remember readin on here one time that a guy from malaysia or somewhere around there had his IX already, and mitsu of japan told him that if he wanted to make some real power, that he would have to switch to a non mivec head i.e evo 8 head.....anybody else remember reading this
Trending Topics
#8
Thats what i thought! I think the current 4g63 is more power capable than the one with the MIVEC due to the variable valve timing on the intake cam. I think it be better keeping an Evo 8 and buying a IX for those of you that can afford it. Or buying a IX if u want to keep the car stock or lightly modify it.
#9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
Mivec on the EVO 9 is a great addition. Unlike the regular MIVEC uses on their other engines this one only changes valve timing and duration (not lift) in the upper rpms, alot like VTEC on the Honda. Well lets just say there won't be a market for CAM upgrades on the EVO 9 IMHO
#10
Originally Posted by DaWorstPlaya
Mivec on the EVO 9 is a great addition. Unlike the regular MIVEC uses on their other engines this one only changes valve timing and duration (not lift) in the upper rpms, alot like VTEC on the Honda. Well lets just say there won't be a market for CAM upgrades on the EVO 9 IMHO
#12
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO MIVEC = Mitsubishi's Inevitable Violent Engine Catastrophe = just one more complexity added to the car = just one more thing to go wrong ... which on a is definitely not a good thing. It may be a good thing for a stock Evo 9, since it should allow to provide us with a more powerful engine while still meeting emissions standards, but for modding purposes, I'd rather go without.
l8r)
l8r)
#13
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mivec should be amazing on the IX, look at vtech on hondas like the ls motor on boost. if you add a vtech head on an ls turbo you gain like 80 whp up top, that is SICK. most people complain of top end on the freeway falling off on the 8 and i see no reason why the addition of mivec won't eliminate that top end drop.
#14
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Millersburg, OHIO
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i hope to god that the evo doesnt walk in the footsteps of the talons and eclipses, 1st ones were great, make power, light fast, 2nd gen, uhh so so, 3rd gen straight up sucked. i know we are at VIII now but it seems to be going in that direction... watch 2011 Evo XI will prolly have like a V6 hybrid or somthing gaay lets hope not though....
Last edited by EVO8 WHOA; Jul 5, 2005 at 02:01 PM.
#15
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (277)
the evo X comes out as a 2007 model as far as I know. that means the evo 9 will only be out one year, because the evo X is supposed to have a completely different powerplant. I'm hoping for a beefy 4g64 stock and a larger turbo making the car has 350 hp but we'll see what happens. Thats gonna make the 9 the weird step child because it will be the only 2.0 turbo mitsu motor to have mivec. I think the 9 is gonna be rough to make tons of power from.