Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Well... we dyno'd it :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:11 PM
  #106  
Evolving Member
 
dazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by GSXTREME95


Yep

We are looking at a 20hp difference between the EVO and the WRX when it should be more like 50hp. Is somebody taking this to Mitsu or do we have to wait for more testing??
If the case is true, will bring this to Mistu. attention change anything?
"You dimm some , you lose some"
dazz is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:14 PM
  #107  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
iodine23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny, now that Shiv has posted this, people are becoming HP whiners. Before the Evo was released I thought that most people around here were saying "HP doesn't matter as much since the Evo is the whole package with Brembo, Recaro, carbon fiber, aluminum and all that other good stuff."

Now everybody is desk dyno racing against SRT-4's and losing because of Shiv's results? You should not be worried about losing a red light race to a WRX or SRT-4, you should be worried about if Mitsubishi is falsely claiming 271HP. In fact I believe that's what Shiv mentioned early on in this thread before he released his results.

If you're worried about HP and going fast in a straight line you'd buy a Camaro or Mustang or something like that anyways,right?
iodine23 is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:15 PM
  #108  
Newbie
 
nostatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by gtr
Com'on ppl this is wheel hp on the most low reading but accurate dyno. If 94 octane gas does bring it up to 188hp that is really close to 271. I'd bet it'll hit exactally at 271hp after breaking it in. Aprox. 190 hp on shiv's dyno.

Isn't that suggesting a 31% drivetrain loss?? Seems wacky to me. According to Shiv's dyno, my 2001 S4 shows an 18% drivetrain loss. Shouldn't wheel HP for the EVO be closer to 215 or so??
nostatic is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:19 PM
  #109  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
91TB78's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NOLA
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although this is a bit disappointing, the car is still amazing. It has been said before, but this car is amazing b/c it is a complete package. Not too mention if Shiv can get an extra 30 whp from basic timing changes then I feel this car can easily hit some serious numbers. Look at the JDM and EDM numbers with the same engine!

iodine23, actually I would worry about a stoplight race against an SRT-4. It was designed to go fast in a straight line. Not that it doesn't do decently well in corners, but it has 0 camber..the tires are even with the pavement. The SRT-4 is a great little car and would be an EXCELLENT alternative to those on here wishing to go really fast in a straight line. The Evo, while quick and fast, is more about handling, braking, etc.
91TB78 is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:20 PM
  #110  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
BADWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by iodine23

If you're worried about HP and going fast in a straight line you'd buy a Camaro or Mustang or something like that anyways,right?
Very true. The reason that people are *****ing is because of the claimed HP #'s. It is truly sad. They should just tell the truth, but MMC is not famous for that anyway, so we shouldn't be suprised! lol

The only thing that you really hear me *****ing about is the lack of the fancy drivetrain toys, like ayc/acd/6spd/front lsd. These are the ONLY thing that this car is missing to make it the savior, in my opinion.

I am moving back to Japan next year. I am going to try to pick up a real evolution 8 (Used). Then I will be happy!

Andy
BADWRX is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:29 PM
  #111  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Alfriedesq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 1,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You can NOT base any assumptions on Shiv's dyno - it reads funny

Once we have real "dyno jet" dyno numbers - then we will know
Alfriedesq is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:33 PM
  #112  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
iodine23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 91TB78

iodine23, actually I would worry about a stoplight race against an SRT-4. It was designed to go fast in a straight line. Not that it doesn't do decently well in corners, but it has 0 camber..the tires are even with the pavement. The SRT-4 is a great little car and would be an EXCELLENT alternative to those on here wishing to go really fast in a straight line. The Evo, while quick and fast, is more about handling, braking, etc.
Oh I guess I didn't word what I was saying properly, I can see how you can mistake my words for that. I wasn't saying "don't worry, it's an Evo, it can take that silly WRX or SRT-4 no problem!" I agree with what you say, the SRT-4 will be a thorn in that Evo's side at a red light race.

I was just pointing out that now that a dyno result has come out, all the desktop dyno jockeys have started racing the Evo against other cars and getting worried about winning or losing based solely on this one result. Really the point of the result may be that Mitsu misquoted performance, and that's much worse than losing some silly street race.
iodine23 is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:37 PM
  #113  
Newbie
 
suave3747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would be absolutely moronic for Mitsu to misquote figures for this car. They know very well that a fairly large percentage of the people that buy these cars are going to tune the 4G63, and any good tuner uses a dyno. They had to realize that a misquote would come out in a matter of weeks if there was one. They even say in the brochure to "go forth and modify," so they'd have to be mildly retarded to over-rate HP when probably 50% of the people that buy these cars will make at least one performance mod at some point, and, in the process, check the figures on a dyno.
suave3747 is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:41 PM
  #114  
-LD
Newbie
 
-LD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Alfriedesq
You can NOT base any assumptions on Shiv's dyno - it reads funny

Once we have real "dyno jet" dyno numbers - then we will know
it may "read funny" (whatever that means)...but it "reads funny" the same for the WRX, the Evo VII, and the USDM Evo

those are the numbers to compare, not the numbers is claiming, not the numbers of another dyno...compare car to car on the same dyno as Vishnu has done

clearly there is less HP in the USDM Evo than the JDM Evo VII Vishnu tested...and the wheel HP number between the USDM Evo and WRX is only 20 HP on vishnu's dyno

edit: also, don't assume is misquoting HP numbers...HP is really just a made up system of measurement and the dyno may very well show 271 crank HP
-LD is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:42 PM
  #115  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Alfriedesq
You can NOT base any assumptions on Shiv's dyno - it reads funny

Once we have real "dyno jet" dyno numbers - then we will know
If funny=realistic, then yes, it is funny as heck

Seriously though, the Dynojet was never intended to be an all-wheel drive dyno. It is nothing more than two 2 wheel drive dynos working independantly of each other. As a result, there is no control over front and rear wheel speed during a dyno pull. The roller which is smaller and lighter (usually the front which is based off the little Dynojet Model 224) will spin earlier and faster than the rear (which is usually based of off the big Model 248). As a result, the two wheels spin at different speeds (!) until the poor little differential takes up the slack. Not only does not simulate anything close to real-world conditions, it is hazardous to differential longevity. This is why it is nearly impossible to dyno a Porsche 911 turbo, AWD Volvo, or any type of AWD system that uses automatically engaging clutch-type diffs to control fore-aft torque distribution.

The Dynojet is a nice, inexpensive, repeatable two-wheel drive dyno. But as an all-wheel drive dyno, it falls very short on many fronts. But they do give big numbers so some people will like it. On my recent tuning trip (to NJ), our Stage 2 cars were putting 290-300 wheel hp to ground measured on an AWD Dynojet. On our dyno, they put down 250-255 wheel hp.

Just my 2c,
Shiv
www.vishnutuning.com

Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Mar 11, 2003 at 01:46 PM.
shiv@vishnu is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:42 PM
  #116  
In Timeout
 
BobbyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Alfriedesq
You can NOT base any assumptions on Shiv's dyno - it reads funny

Once we have real "dyno jet" dyno numbers - then we will know
al stop spewing crap all over these boards. his dyno does not read funny.. dynojet = inflated #'s.. if you want an ego boost fine.. go for it.. and im having a hard time seeing what makes dynojet numbers more "real" as you put it than dyno dynamic #'s..
--bobby
btw, in your reponse do not post your whp #.. no one cares.. you flaunt it around on every board you go to..
BobbyD is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:47 PM
  #117  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (7)
 
superz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester,NY
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I know alot of people will bathmouth me for saying this but I speak from a proffesional standpoint.
You cannot be that naive and beleive everything that a "business" is posting. We should never, ever let any shop guide you by the hand in tuning your car-you will get raped. They are in the business of making money ! That's the bottom line. I worked in a performance shop before and remember all the **** screwing that went on there (thAT's the reason I left). There is no such thing as a shop that is friendly with you, they are so because they need you to spend money.
Dynos can be altered easier than altering an ECU. Go figure that in the morning your car drives in with 200 whp, and by the afternoon it gained 40-50hp. After you spent $1500 between an exhaust and intake.
Not all shops are this way but its very difficult to beleive everything you see and hear. Any shop with the right "potion" to fix your hp deficit should be very well investigated.
Just my opinion as a proffesional. (still waiting for this damn EVO -march 21)
superz is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:48 PM
  #118  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Silencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A front wheel drive vs. an all wheel drive at a drag race on street tires with similiar hp, mmmmm. Correct me if I'm wrong, 0-60 Mitsu (under 5) SRT-4 (5 1/2). I bought an EVO over the SRT-4 for this reason. No threat!
Silencer is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:53 PM
  #119  
Newbie
 
josh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey superz

i hear your arguement, but shiv is pretty well respected, and knows his poopoo. i have had the pleasure of working with shiv on a few of my subarus, and although he runs a business, it is all about knowledge and research for him. the business side is secondary.

i know its hard to read through that on the internet. but, why would shiv do this to every car he had dynoed, including S4's (one of which was mine) that he doesn't sell parts for? and probably never will sell parts for (i havent seen shiv in a few months, so maybe he is ).

i would be more excited about the fact that with mild tuning he got a good increase in hp. no where here have i seen him trying to sell any product. just getting a baseline on hp for these awesome new cars.

josh
josh is offline  
Old Mar 11, 2003, 01:58 PM
  #120  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
91TB78's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NOLA
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The SRT-4 probably isn't a HUGE threat to an Evo for a stop light war, but it will give it a run for its money big time. Although awd is great, how many do you think you'll want to drop the cluth on your Evo?? For me personally I don't think I can afford to do that. First the clutch, then the gears. It gets pretty expensive trying to boost your pride.

Shiv,
At what point (mileage wise) did you guys initially dyno the WRX in stock form? The reason I ask is maybe the Evo needs more miles to loosen it up.

Additionally, the Evo has a mechanical diff to run through instead of the viscous in the WRX, plus the Evo has the viscous center diff.

I still feel that those that bought the car for just straight line acceleration probably spent too much for what they really want. I'm not saying you don't deserve it or that the Evo is not a good acceleration tool, but it is so much more than that.
91TB78 is offline  


Quick Reply: Well... we dyno'd it :)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:51 PM.