Worthy rivals for stock Evo?
Oct 19, 2005, 01:16 PM
#46
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=
You say you've seen many bone stock ls1's run 12.9 stock, but I've never seen one. In fact, I see LS1s have trouble hitting 12.9 with exhaust and intake. [/QUOTE]
Thats just crazy must not be a good driver. 2001-2002 fbodys will (manual) would hit that with just a exhaust cut-out and a Lid (CAI) its going lower. I added exhaust and lid to my car with a drag radial (nitto) 1.73 60' and hit a 13.2
You say you've seen many bone stock ls1's run 12.9 stock, but I've never seen one. In fact, I see LS1s have trouble hitting 12.9 with exhaust and intake. [/QUOTE]
Thats just crazy must not be a good driver. 2001-2002 fbodys will (manual) would hit that with just a exhaust cut-out and a Lid (CAI) its going lower. I added exhaust and lid to my car with a drag radial (nitto) 1.73 60' and hit a 13.2
Oct 19, 2005, 01:18 PM
#47
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Yeah, I haven't seen a stock GT get anywhere near 13.0-13.1.
Your Evo can hit 13.0 stock if you're a great driver.
Your Evo can hit 13.0 stock if you're a great driver.
This would be Awsome I cant wait to go to the track. I still got your PM explaining how to launch. Theres not many but there out there (2005).
Oct 19, 2005, 01:21 PM
#49
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tahiti
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
As for the NSX, who cares how much it costs? I'm just telling him cars that he can expect to beat from a dig in stock form. Since the NSX can run 13.0-13.1 stock, I consider it even like the STi.
Nice car but way too expensive for what is it .
Oct 19, 2005, 01:21 PM
#50
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hercules
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the early nsxs were slow as dirt.. its only after i think 93 that they got teh 280+ hp motor. with a good launch the newish nsx would prolly beat an evo barely by pulling on teh top end. as far as any ls1 type car.. they only get the 12.9s with drag radials... so therefore they are not stock. 12s wont happen on stock tires.
you guys have forgotten the most important thing. the only thing that really matters is the driver.. ive seen evos running 15 second 1/4 miles and high 14s with a 2.3 60 foot. the 05s are easier to launch due to the 2 step limiter,(may not be the fastest way since it is only @ 5000 but at least its consistent) so if the guy has an 05 he will smash most anything off the line, rigth on up to the 1320.
you guys have forgotten the most important thing. the only thing that really matters is the driver.. ive seen evos running 15 second 1/4 miles and high 14s with a 2.3 60 foot. the 05s are easier to launch due to the 2 step limiter,(may not be the fastest way since it is only @ 5000 but at least its consistent) so if the guy has an 05 he will smash most anything off the line, rigth on up to the 1320.
Oct 19, 2005, 01:23 PM
#51
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vishnu_Evo8
the early nsxs were slow as dirt.. its only after i think 93 that they got teh 280+ hp motor. with a good launch the newish nsx would prolly beat an evo barely by pulling on teh top end. as far as any ls1 type car.. they only get the 12.9s with drag radials... so therefore they are not stock. 12s wont happen on stock tires.
you guys have forgotten the most important thing. the only thing that really matters is the driver.. ive seen evos running 15 second 1/4 miles and high 14s with a 2.3 60 foot. the 05s are easier to launch due to the 2 step limiter,(may not be the fastest way since it is only @ 5000 but at least its consistent) so if the guy has an 05 he will smash most anything off the line, rigth on up to the 1320.
you guys have forgotten the most important thing. the only thing that really matters is the driver.. ive seen evos running 15 second 1/4 miles and high 14s with a 2.3 60 foot. the 05s are easier to launch due to the 2 step limiter,(may not be the fastest way since it is only @ 5000 but at least its consistent) so if the guy has an 05 he will smash most anything off the line, rigth on up to the 1320.
Last edited by Dan2510; Oct 19, 2005 at 01:26 PM.
Oct 19, 2005, 01:29 PM
#53
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vishnu_Evo8
yeah.. i have heard that some of the late ls1's are freaks and put down like 300 whp stock.. i guess one of those vs a stock 05 would be a good race.
Oct 19, 2005, 01:29 PM
#54
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't forget that people are putting LS1s in *******ed EVERYTHING these days. I think I even heard rumors of a LS1 WRX (I weep for the world). If someone rigged an LS1 into some lightweight car, then yeah, probably it could take an Evo. I think we should do less talking about the engine and more about what car it is in. An LS1 in a 2000 lb. car will run a lot faster than an LS1 in a 3000 lb. car.
Oct 19, 2005, 01:29 PM
#55
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tsurara
Don't forget that people are putting LS1s in *******ed EVERYTHING these days. I think I even heard rumors of a LS1 WRX (I weep for the world). If someone rigged an LS1 into some lightweight car, then yeah, probably it could take an Evo. I think we should do less talking about the engine and more about what car it is in. An LS1 in a 2000 lb. car will run a lot faster than an LS1 in a 3000 lb. car.
Oct 19, 2005, 01:32 PM
#56
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
With a proper launch, you will beat the following stock cars from a dig:
- All GTOs
- All GTOs
Oct 19, 2005, 01:34 PM
#58
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Arithmetic
Are you sure about that? I witness a stock LS2 GTO beat an o3 evo from a dig. I got on video a stock AT LS2 GTO vs. o5 RS dead even upto 100mph-ish from a dig. The GTO reel in the evo about 3rd gear after the evo out launch him.
Oct 19, 2005, 01:35 PM
#59
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sunny Isle in the Caribbean
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey, There are quite a few 'stock' cars that you should look out for ... like 1997 McLaren F1 3.9 11.7 (MT Aug 2001), 2004 Porsche Turbo X50 3.7 11.86, 2005 Porsche 911 GT2 3.6 11.7 (MT Aug 2004), many Lamborghinis, etc
1993 Toyota Supra Turbo 4.9 13.4 will be a close call,
Check it out yourself at http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
1993 Toyota Supra Turbo 4.9 13.4 will be a close call,
Check it out yourself at http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
Oct 19, 2005, 01:36 PM
#60
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sycamore, IL
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On the way to work today this PT cruiser smoked my ***... I dont know what the hell he done to it, but I never saw a car pass me so fast. I was accelerating through the gears at full boost just moving a long, and this guy comes up from behind and passed me, I don't know how he did it. I have always hate the PT loser, and now i hate it even more.