Worthy rivals for stock Evo?
Oct 19, 2005 | 10:37 PM
#106
Originally Posted by Enyth
wow last time i checked, wrx's never ran "high 11 secs" stock 
we are talking STOCK here. Read the posts.
we are talking STOCK here. Read the posts.
Oct 19, 2005 | 11:56 PM
#108
FYI: As far as Euros go you can beat most of them stock for stock with the exception of any Mercedes Benz with AMG or McLaren in the name. My coworker has an E55 AMG, supercharged v-8 w/ around 470hp factory rating. It also weighs close to 4k lbs. So jokingly i invited him to the strip a couple weekends ago, to my surprise he actually took my invite.
At the track, his first time there, he was lining up against and beating C6 vettes, 03+ Cobras, among others. Most people, including myself, couldn't believe what he was running let alone that he was actually tracking a ~$80k car. The thing is plush but can run consistent 12.5s with a slush box! The glove box is heated/ air conditioned for crying out loud!
whatever i thought it was a funny story...
At the track, his first time there, he was lining up against and beating C6 vettes, 03+ Cobras, among others. Most people, including myself, couldn't believe what he was running let alone that he was actually tracking a ~$80k car. The thing is plush but can run consistent 12.5s with a slush box! The glove box is heated/ air conditioned for crying out loud!
whatever i thought it was a funny story...
Oct 20, 2005 | 12:20 AM
#110
Evolving Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Torrance, California
Originally Posted by prospectevoER
wait. except nsxsss??? a stock evo should be able to take every nsx from a dig. and the automatics with 260hp have no chance.
But I know stock to stock evo > skyline or supra
Oct 20, 2005 | 12:25 AM
#111
Newbie
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Tahiti
Originally Posted by bfdd
I thought it was kind of funny he said "except NSX's" but didn't say anything about skylines or supras either But I know stock to stock evo > skyline or supra
But I know stock to stock evo > skyline or supra The Nismo GT-R34 ( around 325-330 HP ) got a 1/4 time of 11.99 on a video I saw severals years ago , but I don't remember the trap speed . And yeah it's a stock car , as the MR version of the Evo .
Oct 20, 2005 | 12:40 AM
#112
Newbie
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Portland
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
As for being stock, Skylines and Supras alike are overrated. Both, Evolutions and STis are faster than both of them in the 1/4 mile. In a top speed run, I can't say, because I've never had my STi over 110 mph, but with 3.91 gears, I believe they are, I think it's doubtful that an STi will run over a 145 mph top speed. The power is there, but it's going to run out of gearing. 
The same probably holds true for the Evo, because I believe they have a 4.xx gear ratio.
Start modding, and it's anyone's game, however, in the end, the cars with the displacement are the ones that are going to win. "There's no replacement for displacement," once it comes down to mod for mod.
The same probably holds true for the Evo, because I believe they have a 4.xx gear ratio.Start modding, and it's anyone's game, however, in the end, the cars with the displacement are the ones that are going to win. "There's no replacement for displacement," once it comes down to mod for mod.
Oct 20, 2005 | 02:10 AM
#113
Originally Posted by Dan2510
2002 Firehawk, SS, and WS6 will be VERY HARD races to win if both cars had good drivers. I would have to give the kill to the LS1's evos are fast but the VIII's (13.5) arent that fast. I have witnessed many LS1's bone stock dipping 12.9 stock (2002).
Oct 20, 2005 | 02:14 AM
#114
Originally Posted by dan628
On the way to work today this PT cruiser smoked my ***... I dont know what the hell he done to it, but I never saw a car pass me so fast. I was accelerating through the gears at full boost just moving a long, and this guy comes up from behind and passed me, I don't know how he did it. I have always hate the PT loser, and now i hate it even more.
Oct 20, 2005 | 04:25 AM
#115
Originally Posted by Steiner
Mopar stage 3 turbo kit. The PT Cruiser shares the same engine as the SRT-4. It's like an SRT-4 minivan IMHO.
ex 2003 PT cruiser GT owner
m~
Oct 20, 2005 | 04:46 AM
#116
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,002
Likes: 11
From: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Originally Posted by jasburbak
I guess these kind of threads have been talked all over individually, but what are the stock Evo's worthy rivals?
this kid bet me $100 ( i know its nothing, but a free turbo timer in the end
that his stock '00 Mustang GT would smoke me...the thing is, he's never even heard of an Evo..he said there is no way a 4 cylinder car can beat him..
although he doensnt know hes in for a suprise, i was questioning who else can i take advantage of?
this kid bet me $100 ( i know its nothing, but a free turbo timer in the end
that his stock '00 Mustang GT would smoke me...the thing is, he's never even heard of an Evo..he said there is no way a 4 cylinder car can beat him..although he doensnt know hes in for a suprise, i was questioning who else can i take advantage of?
. So take him out the the drag way, stage up, rev up build some boost (or use the 5K limiter if you have an 05), use proper launch techs (search), and you will own him by a sec or so.
Oct 20, 2005 | 06:43 AM
#117
Originally Posted by prospectevoER
wait. except nsxsss??? a stock evo should be able to take every nsx from a dig. and the automatics with 260hp have no chance.
Oct 20, 2005 | 07:02 AM
#118
Originally Posted by bfdd
I thought it was kind of funny he said "except NSX's" but didn't say anything about skylines or supras either But I know stock to stock evo > skyline or supra
But I know stock to stock evo > skyline or supra
Oct 20, 2005 | 07:24 AM
#119
Warrtlon from your first reply about "Acuras - Not NSX"
From my understanding NSX does about the same stock quarter mile time as stock Evo's.
Are the newest ones much more powerful, or something?
From my understanding NSX does about the same stock quarter mile time as stock Evo's.
Are the newest ones much more powerful, or something?
Oct 20, 2005 | 07:34 AM
#120
Evolved Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by EvoVIII_SFL
Warrtlon from your first reply about "Acuras - Not NSX"
From my understanding NSX does about the same stock quarter mile time as stock Evo's.
Are the newest ones much more powerful, or something?
From my understanding NSX does about the same stock quarter mile time as stock Evo's.
Are the newest ones much more powerful, or something?
As time went on, and power was increased, they would eventually clock in around 12.90-13.20.
Either way, for $90,000, they're major underachievers.