Vid - EVO FQ400 vs Lambrogini
#21
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ATL
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by streetturbo
He also didn't like the the 4 mile per gallon consumption vhen driving all out. And he also mentioned the drawbacks in 4000 mile tyre change, 4500 mile service. They tought the fq320 is the way to go.
#27
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, he was talking of the fq400...his complaints were the turbo lag (duh...huge turbo to get 400hp, without too many turbo spooling goodies....ie cams, intake/exhaust headers, etc) turning radius (which I agree with), stock radio too blinky and annoying (we don't get that radio), and the fq400 will rip the wheel well liners out because of the do-luck-type lip at speed. Also whined about the servicing as mentioned above, and the milage when you beat on it.....and the stock clutch....and suspension being too tight.