Got Dyno'd! with dynosheet!
Dec 19, 2005, 07:01 PM
#16
Originally Posted by IEXCELR8
You may be right. He may not have had the TP on either.We will see when hits the track.
Dec 19, 2005, 07:05 PM
#18
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
He did have the test pipe. Petey and I have been following each other's progress from the very beginning when we both got our MRs. He's always done very well with very little, but his 12.6-12.7 runs were with the flash and test pipe. The cat-back didn't add much, but he dyno'd what he dyno'd. I'm just wondering what he thinks when seeing Sergio's numbers on the same dyno not too long ago.
No I hear yah, especially since Sergio had cams. Those are great numbers for just a flash and test pipe.
Dec 19, 2005, 07:11 PM
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Hey, Petey, those definitely are surprising numbers. I can't seem to reconcile them with these results, though:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno
Sergio dyno'd just about the same at PD (305whp/296wtq), but trapped 114.8 on 93oct. What do you think?
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno
Sergio dyno'd just about the same at PD (305whp/296wtq), but trapped 114.8 on 93oct. What do you think?
Warr, was Sergio running in the tower lane where the traps were 2 mph higher than normal?
Dec 20, 2005, 05:45 AM
#21
I don't think my car is making as much power as his. I do not forsee 114mph trap speeds either. The difference must be in the corrections entered. Either way my car is running very strong and now breaks loose in 1st gear. I would say 110 traps seem to be more likely, and to tell you the truth I would be perfectly happy with that. I have read that a stock 05 dynos at 235 at this dyno but who knows. Can anyone distinguish the correction factors at the bottom? Either way I get to the track fairly often so corresponding 1/4 will be in order very shortly. Next on my list is a custom 02 eliminator downpipe.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Hey, Petey, those definitely are surprising numbers. I can't seem to reconcile them with these results, though:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno
Sergio dyno'd just about the same at PD (305whp/296wtq), but trapped 114.8 on 93oct. What do you think?
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno
Sergio dyno'd just about the same at PD (305whp/296wtq), but trapped 114.8 on 93oct. What do you think?
Dec 20, 2005, 07:23 AM
#22
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Petey Turbo
I don't think my car is making as much power as his. I do not forsee 114mph trap speeds either. The difference must be in the corrections entered. Either way my car is running very strong and now breaks loose in 1st gear. I would say 110 traps seem to be more likely, and to tell you the truth I would be perfectly happy with that. I have read that a stock 05 dynos at 235 at this dyno but who knows. Can anyone distinguish the correction factors at the bottom? Either way I get to the track fairly often so corresponding 1/4 will be in order very shortly. Next on my list is a custom 02 eliminator downpipe.
I really like the shape of the dyno sheet
Enjoy
Dec 20, 2005, 07:54 AM
#23
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
So I take it you are happy wit your Dyno Flash tune ?
I really like the shape of the dyno sheet
Enjoy
I really like the shape of the dyno sheet
Enjoy
Dec 20, 2005, 10:08 AM
#25
Al,
It has been working very well for me. I'm glad you talked me into getting it last summer at e-town..The power curve is very good and looks like it would be a custom tune, very good job. I may want to step up to the 2 stage soon in order to run race gas if I do not go with the MAFTpro.
It has been working very well for me. I'm glad you talked me into getting it last summer at e-town..The power curve is very good and looks like it would be a custom tune, very good job. I may want to step up to the 2 stage soon in order to run race gas if I do not go with the MAFTpro.
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
So I take it you are happy wit your Dyno Flash tune ?
I really like the shape of the dyno sheet
Enjoy
I really like the shape of the dyno sheet
Enjoy
Dec 20, 2005, 10:26 AM
#26
Originally Posted by el producto
noob question...
are dyno pulls always done in 3rd gear or does it vary. I know they can't do 1st and 2nd gear pulls due to slippage, j/w if its only 3rd?
are dyno pulls always done in 3rd gear or does it vary. I know they can't do 1st and 2nd gear pulls due to slippage, j/w if its only 3rd?
My MR was dynoed in 4th, since third is shorter than on the 5 speed.
Dec 20, 2005, 10:39 AM
#27
Originally Posted by atlvalet
My MR was dynoed in 4th, since third is shorter than on the 5 speed.
06 gear ratios between 6spd and 5spd is even closer in 3rd:
2006 - Gear Ratios
EVO & EVO RS.................... EVO MR
1st: 2.785:1 .................... 1st: 2.909:1
2nd: 1.950:1 .................... 2nd: 1.944:1
3rd: 1.444:1 .................... 3rd: 1.434:1
4th: 1.096:1 .................... 4th: 1.100:1
5th: 0.761:1 .................... 5th: 0.868:1
Final drive: 4.529:1 ..........6th: 0.693:1 Final drive: 4.583:1
2004 gear ratios
EVO & EVO RS.................... EVO MR
1st: 2.982:1 .................... 1st: 2.909:1
2nd: 1.950:1 .................... 2nd: 1.944:1
3rd: 1.407:1 .................... 3rd: 1.434:1
4th: 1.031:1 .................... 4th: 1.100:1
5th: 0.720:1 .................... 5th: 0.868:1
Final drive: 4.529:1..........6th: 0.693:1 Final drive: 4.583:1
Dec 20, 2005, 10:45 AM
#28
Yeah, I tried doing 4th on my MR, but it didn't work well at all. It was such a long pull that I was producing a lot of heat and erratic readings. I stuck with 3rd, since it's so much closer to 3rd on the 5spd. Incidentally, I saw around 10whp more (peak) each time in 3rd than in 4th, since I wasn't heatsoaking so badly.
Dec 20, 2005, 10:58 AM
#29
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fort Myers, Florida
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Our recent dyno tuning session in Orlando two weeks back had the MR's tuning in 4th and GSR/RS in third. Switching to 4th on the 5-speed would have netted better results, especially in the torque department according to Jester Tuning. A stock MR (2005) made almost as much torque and about 12 less hp than me (also a 2005) which was shocking. But John explained it was due to the different gearing and my dyno reading would have been higher in 4th. Dunno...I know my RX7 always makes better numbers in 4th than third. I also get more samples when logging in 4th as well but IAT's do tend to go up higher and the pull is longer. She's topping out at 160mph in 4th!
Warr, you're able to log timing, knock, IAT's, etc...with your logger, correct? So in 4th there's no change in timing resulting in a power loss? It's all intake air temps?
Warr, you're able to log timing, knock, IAT's, etc...with your logger, correct? So in 4th there's no change in timing resulting in a power loss? It's all intake air temps?
Dec 20, 2005, 11:07 AM
#30
I only logged timing, and it was indeed suffering at the top when things starting getting hot. My torque and mid-range were fine, but it was erratic at the top, and I was running less than 21psi on 93oct. It was also in the summer, so that didn't help. Not as hot as down in Orlando, but hot enough to keep numbers down. I didn't log IATs, but I assume they were much higher than normal during 4th gear pulls while stationary in a hot dyno bay.