Got Dyno'd! with dynosheet!
Dec 19, 2005, 05:58 PM
#1
Got Dyno'd! with dynosheet!
Got my MR on the dyno for the first time just to see where I was at and have a baseline to go from. I do not know correction factors ect. but I do know it is a corrected number on an all wheel dyno at Precision Dyno Tuning. I took my car there on saturday for the holiday dyno day and couldn't be happier. They are a great bunch of guys and would reccomend them to anyone.
I came out with 295WHP and 298TQ. I was not expecting such a high number to be honest. I have ran 12.6@108 with the same setup minus the cat back. After installing the cat back the car seems to have gotten more of a top end. My mod list is as follows.
1. Agency Power Cat Back
2. UR 2.5 inch test pipe
3. Dynoflash mail in
Thats all!
1st run
2nd run
I came out with 295WHP and 298TQ. I was not expecting such a high number to be honest. I have ran 12.6@108 with the same setup minus the cat back. After installing the cat back the car seems to have gotten more of a top end. My mod list is as follows.
1. Agency Power Cat Back
2. UR 2.5 inch test pipe
3. Dynoflash mail in
Thats all!
1st run
2nd run
Dec 19, 2005, 06:08 PM
#3
OMG THATS REALLY HOT..I MUST GET AN EVO9 MR....
I GOT 12.5 AND 110mph with my 03 evo with cam, methanol kit .running(25psi) and ported manifold o2 housing, and turbin housing.....etc...u name it i did it all except stock turbo....
this is amazing # on mustang dyno~!
I GOT 12.5 AND 110mph with my 03 evo with cam, methanol kit .running(25psi) and ported manifold o2 housing, and turbin housing.....etc...u name it i did it all except stock turbo....
this is amazing # on mustang dyno~!
Dec 19, 2005, 06:09 PM
#5
Hey, Petey, those definitely are surprising numbers. I can't seem to reconcile them with these results, though:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno
Sergio dyno'd just about the same at PD (305whp/296wtq), but trapped 114.8 on 93oct. What do you think?
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno
Sergio dyno'd just about the same at PD (305whp/296wtq), but trapped 114.8 on 93oct. What do you think?
Last edited by Warrtalon; Dec 19, 2005 at 06:13 PM.
Dec 19, 2005, 06:11 PM
#7
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Hey, Petey, those definitely are surprising numbers. I can't seem to reconcile them with these results, though:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno
Sergio dyno'd just about the same, but trapped 114.8 on 93oct.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno
Sergio dyno'd just about the same, but trapped 114.8 on 93oct.
Trending Topics
Dec 19, 2005, 06:16 PM
#8
Originally Posted by razorlab
Well he did say these are correct numbers...
Dec 19, 2005, 06:19 PM
#9
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Corrected numbers? Yes, maybe, but Sergio's were also SAE corrected. I listed the uncorrected numbers. Sergio's SAE corrected numbers were 300whp/290wtq. Still right in the same ballpark, which is strange for a 6-7mph difference in trap speed.
Dec 19, 2005, 06:42 PM
#12
Originally Posted by IEXCELR8
What are you guys talking about, his 108 trap was without the cat back.
"I have ran 12.6@108 with the same setup minus the cat back. After installing the cat back the car seems to have gotten more of a top end. "
"I have ran 12.6@108 with the same setup minus the cat back. After installing the cat back the car seems to have gotten more of a top end. "
Dec 19, 2005, 06:55 PM
#15
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
That's no more than 10-15whp. He already had a test pipe, which gives the biggest gain in the exhaust. He might trap 109-110 now, but not 114+.
You may be right. He may not have had the TP on either.We will see when hits the track.