So is the 6th gear or the IX even worth it???
Dec 29, 2005, 09:15 AM
#37
Evolved Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: benson, nc
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
question... my dad drives and 05 sti and he wants to know if its possible to get it tuned along with all of the other evo owners that are interested in this thread?
(edited)... nevermind, wrong thread, sorry
(edited)... nevermind, wrong thread, sorry
Last edited by alloyic_rs; Dec 29, 2005 at 09:21 AM.
Dec 29, 2005, 10:04 AM
#39
Evolving Member
Originally Posted by _EVOled_
Its all good...Kind of off subject but just curious: Is it true that the X will no longer have the 4G63 and be a lot more money!?!?
Dec 29, 2005, 10:11 AM
#41
Evolving Member
Originally Posted by alloyic_rs
so whats gonna replace it?
I don't know actually. They haven't published yet. The engine on the concept X
is always covered.
Dec 29, 2005, 10:28 AM
#43
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by _EVOled_
How do you like your RS?? Its bothering me I cant decide between the IX or VIII RS or the VIII MR....
Dec 29, 2005, 11:41 AM
#45
Originally Posted by EVO Neil
Did you bother to look at the link to the article I posted on page 1 of this thread? That would at least help you decide between the VIII RS and MR. For the street or the track the lack of ABS in the RS IS a factor that shouldn't be overlooked. Creature comforts are another. The main reason for the RS is for race teams who are going to strip that car anyway or if the lower price helps you afford an Evo. I think we proved that in stock form it's slower around a track, but faster down the strip due to its lighter weight. So it's a trade-off between what you feel you will use the car for. The IX is better than either of those. Warrtalon only mentions the power difference on the IX, but their are minor improvements to many areas of the car, including the interior, handling, aero, etc.
"... in science there is no 'knowledge', in the sense in which Plato and Aristotle understood the word, in the sense which implies finality; in science, we never have sufficient reason for the belief that we have attained the truth. ... This view means, furthermore, that we have no proofs in science (excepting, of course, pure mathematics and logic). In the empirical sciences, which alone can furnish us with information about the world we live in, proofs do not occur, if we mean by 'proof' an argument which establishes once and for ever the truth of a theory."
Sir Karl Popper, The Problem of Induction, 1953
All you did in that article was show what three vehicles did on that particular day(or days)...