What does evo have that lancer doesnt?
Jan 25, 2006, 11:19 AM
#32
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: From Ohio, now in N. Virginia
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there's that dealer instructional video on SoCalEvo's website. They talk about the differences in the welds of the structure and chassis rigidity. It's a huge difference in the body structure that you def can't bolt on.
BTW, is the lancer chassis still CT9A? - I can't imagine it being designated the same b/c of the difference in the chassis production.
BTW, is the lancer chassis still CT9A? - I can't imagine it being designated the same b/c of the difference in the chassis production.
Jan 25, 2006, 12:33 PM
#33
Evolving Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Reisterstown, Maryland
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the whole entire car is different, I hate when people tell me that my EVO is an upgraded lancer. I choose not to put by EVO in the same class as a lancer. Difference is lancer's are built in the U.S.A. and all the EVO's are built in Japan.
Jan 25, 2006, 12:45 PM
#34
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gsxfury
the whole entire car is different, I hate when people tell me that my EVO is an upgraded lancer. I choose not to put by EVO in the same class as a lancer. Difference is lancer's are built in the U.S.A. and all the EVO's are built in Japan.
Originally Posted by bdking57
Considering the cars are made on two different continents
Jan 25, 2006, 01:15 PM
#35
Evolved Member
Originally Posted by Gsxfury
the whole entire car is different, I hate when people tell me that my EVO is an upgraded lancer. I choose not to put by EVO in the same class as a lancer. Difference is lancer's are built in the U.S.A. and all the EVO's are built in Japan.
ALL LANCERS COME FROM THE SAME PLANT IN JAPAN.
Originally Posted by mdosu
BTW, is the lancer chassis still CT9A? - I can't imagine it being designated the same b/c of the difference in the chassis production.
~'06 Lancer Raliart is CS7A
Last edited by GPTourer; Jan 26, 2006 at 08:54 AM.
Jan 26, 2006, 03:38 AM
#36
Evolving Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by coco
Really I did not know that. Thanks
And for the people that think this thread is pointless please don't participate. I have no intention of converting a lancer to an Evo, I just want to know as much as I can about my car.
Does somebody know if the handbrake is hydraulic, or cable?
And for the people that think this thread is pointless please don't participate. I have no intention of converting a lancer to an Evo, I just want to know as much as I can about my car.
Does somebody know if the handbrake is hydraulic, or cable?
Jan 26, 2006, 03:56 AM
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North of Indy, and North Olmsted, OH
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wizzo 8
Besides the welds I think you could bolt everything into it. DRIVETRAIN, Intercooler, Bumpers, fenders, Intrument cluster, wing, Brakes, wheels, seats, headlights, tailights, rear window with wiper, hood, trunk lid, windshield, steering wheel Thats all I could think of. Just buy an Evo. To build one from a lancer would be like this guy doing this>
Jan 26, 2006, 04:01 AM
#38
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: All Over SoCal
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mdosu
there's that dealer instructional video on SoCalEvo's website. They talk about the differences in the welds of the structure and chassis rigidity. It's a huge difference in the body structure that you def can't bolt on.
BTW, is the lancer chassis still CT9A? - I can't imagine it being designated the same b/c of the difference in the chassis production.
BTW, is the lancer chassis still CT9A? - I can't imagine it being designated the same b/c of the difference in the chassis production.
Jan 26, 2006, 09:02 AM
#41
Evolved Member
Originally Posted by PurgeIt
Completely different chassis altogether from the CT9A. although there is a similarity visually, it's only skin deep.
The same thing probably applies when an M3 comes down the line alongside a regular 3 series. Or a Shelby GT500 next to a V6 'Stang coupe.
Last edited by GPTourer; Jan 26, 2006 at 09:14 AM.
Jan 26, 2006, 04:44 PM
#44
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Aberdeen, NJ now in Ca.
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bdking57
I thought the cars only shared one part.. and that was the roof on the standard models ( not the aluminum ones.. they are 100% different) Considering the cars are made on two different continents there really is nothing the same.. Its not like comparing a mustang with a cobra..
Jan 27, 2006, 10:54 AM
#45
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sunny Isle in the Caribbean
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry for this late post. I was at the garage and asked the guy about the differences, not the bolt on stuff, but the structural.
He said that there were lots unfortunately I cant remember them all (and lots were already mentioned here like length, width, lower etc), but I do recall he mentioned about the frame and the floor. Something about the frame being modulized with both front and back subframes and that the floor carries a drive shaft tunnel (similar to that of a RWD car).
He said that there were lots unfortunately I cant remember them all (and lots were already mentioned here like length, width, lower etc), but I do recall he mentioned about the frame and the floor. Something about the frame being modulized with both front and back subframes and that the floor carries a drive shaft tunnel (similar to that of a RWD car).