By far the worst review of an Evo IX I have ever seen...
Jul 10, 2006, 04:08 PM
#46
Originally Posted by evolution_racer
It seems that CNET revised the article at some point because the comments posted by people talked about some information that wasn't in the review or had been edited, i.e. the HP and 0-60 times. After reading it I thought they talked up the car pretty well and downplayed the other stuff they didn't like. Then I watched the video and understood where this is all coming from. The "Eye-X"? For #@&$*'s sake, at least do a little research before reviewing a car. 
The original article was re-written. It was a cut-and-paste job that seemed to be done by someone in England. THe picture they had up was of an MR, but now it's a regular Evo. THey're hacks over at C-Net.
Jul 10, 2006, 10:26 PM
#51
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gatorade
Eggy, whats up man? hows it going?
I bet you like that car on Supraforums in the othercars section...the evo with the guady bodykit
I bet you like that car on Supraforums in the othercars section...the evo with the guady bodykit
No wonder I've never seen another modded car from Iceland...
Jul 10, 2006, 10:34 PM
#52
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This has to go
----------------------
the rims
the bodykit
the dub sticky
needs to clean everything
and get rid of that pos intake hahah
in with the new
--------------------------
clean TE37's
Clean all over
clean engine bay
other than that..its pretty damn ugly...
----------------------
the rims
the bodykit
the dub sticky
needs to clean everything
and get rid of that pos intake hahah
in with the new
--------------------------
clean TE37's
Clean all over
clean engine bay
other than that..its pretty damn ugly...
Aug 1, 2006, 10:29 PM
#54
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Jersey, USA
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ramzezz
Yur, this is by far the best review of an evo i've ever read. You sure know how to put the words in the right place for this great car.
Aug 1, 2006, 11:20 PM
#55
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Autogasm
heres a better one http://s20.photobucket.com/albums/b2...rrent=evo1.flv
Aug 2, 2006, 01:49 AM
#56
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Yur
Thank you. They did publish it by the way: http://reviews.cnet.com/2006_Mitsubi...4485&tag=uolst
Aug 2, 2006, 07:29 AM
#58
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Secret Volcano Island
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fantastic seats, nice steering wheel.. everything else about the interior is average. Your money is buying what's under the surface. I was worried I'd miss my M3 because of its better interior and extra features.. not at all.
Aug 2, 2006, 07:42 AM
#59
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that was a spot on review. they gave performance a 10 (perfect) - "this exceedingly rare score is reserved for a product that is as perfect as it could be". and comfort was a 5, which is average. i'd agree with that.
don't forget, that is a techy site reviewing a car that is geared towards performance and not cool interior electronics. cnet is better for reviews on the latest electronics.
don't forget, that is a techy site reviewing a car that is geared towards performance and not cool interior electronics. cnet is better for reviews on the latest electronics.
Aug 2, 2006, 07:52 AM
#60
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milano, ITALY
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I found it a well balanced article, who has as ideal readers those who don't know what an EVO is and would like to know.
So it's only fair to highlight both pros and cons of the car.
If you look at the values explained, you can see how fair the article is: comfort is given a 5.0, which is rated as: "functional but unremarkable", which is exactly what the EVO is from a comfort point of view.
Safety is rated 8, which stands for "superior in so many ways that its relatively few drawbacks are not very important", and again, I find this absolutely spot-on.
Performance is rated 10: "This exceedingly rare score is reserved for a product that is as perfect as it could be." Again, absolutely correct.
You may object: "who cares about comfort while driving an EVO?" well, you never know.
If you are not interested in comfort, you just ignore the Comfort rating of 5 and you will judge the car just by its Performance rating of 10, but it's only fair and right to give a rating to ALL aspects of the car.
So it's only fair to highlight both pros and cons of the car.
If you look at the values explained, you can see how fair the article is: comfort is given a 5.0, which is rated as: "functional but unremarkable", which is exactly what the EVO is from a comfort point of view.
Safety is rated 8, which stands for "superior in so many ways that its relatively few drawbacks are not very important", and again, I find this absolutely spot-on.
Performance is rated 10: "This exceedingly rare score is reserved for a product that is as perfect as it could be." Again, absolutely correct.
You may object: "who cares about comfort while driving an EVO?" well, you never know.
If you are not interested in comfort, you just ignore the Comfort rating of 5 and you will judge the car just by its Performance rating of 10, but it's only fair and right to give a rating to ALL aspects of the car.