Revolver vs JUN
Jul 19, 2006 | 01:41 PM
#1
Revolver vs JUN
First off.... does anyone one know if/when revolver plans on releasing more cams? Because it seems they are seriously impossible to get unless you buy them used. That being the case, i've been considering the newly released JUN 272s. I know they made almost 60whp more on ams's 42r than hks 280s, but how much would that translate into on a stock or 20g turbo. I want to get more hp and more trq than my hks 272s are giving me. So i ask you this... how do jun 272 cams compare to revolver 262/264 cams? =]
Jul 19, 2006 | 02:51 PM
#5
i'm aware that both cams have very high lift, revolver is 11.5mm and i think jun might be 11.3mm?? anyone?? but having adjustable cam gears and aem ems i should be able to be fine for daily driving =] plus that's what a motor cycle is for =P
Jul 19, 2006 | 02:52 PM
#6
i want the cams that make the most power. i could care less about idle or how not dd they are. i dont understand cams at all and im starting to do my reseach for them now. i was told the revolver cams where the best for power gain's
Trending Topics
Jul 19, 2006 | 03:04 PM
#8
ams says it'll be VERY hard w/ JUN cams and stock ecu. i know w/ adjustable cam gears on revolvers some people straightened out the idle. But i agree, i just want the most power... i'm really more interested to see how much torque the JUNs make, cause i know the revolvers were trq monsters!
Jul 19, 2006 | 08:29 PM
#12
I loved the Revolvers when I had my car and the new owner also loves them. He tuned the car on UTEC and passed inspection.
If you haven't seen the idle tuning thread posted it's worth a look.
Revolver is a small company and I think the result gotten with thier cams caused a mad rush on them and they were not prepared with a large stock. I know they are eager to get more cams back in stock.
A lot of R&D went into the grind for the Revolvers. They are not in it to make a buck, they did it to make a better cam then what was being offered.
What a lot of people don't know is the Revolver springs were designed by a expert spring designer from F1 among many other disciplines of racing.
If you haven't seen the idle tuning thread posted it's worth a look.
Revolver is a small company and I think the result gotten with thier cams caused a mad rush on them and they were not prepared with a large stock. I know they are eager to get more cams back in stock.
A lot of R&D went into the grind for the Revolvers. They are not in it to make a buck, they did it to make a better cam then what was being offered.
What a lot of people don't know is the Revolver springs were designed by a expert spring designer from F1 among many other disciplines of racing.
Jul 19, 2006 | 08:42 PM
#13
Originally Posted by timzcat
I loved the Revolvers when I had my car and the new owner also loves them. He tuned the car on UTEC and passed inspection.
If you haven't seen the idle tuning thread posted it's worth a look.
Revolver is a small company and I think the result gotten with thier cams caused a mad rush on them and they were not prepared with a large stock. I know they are eager to get more cams back in stock.
A lot of R&D went into the grind for the Revolvers. They are not in it to make a buck, they did it to make a better cam then what was being offered.
What a lot of people don't know is the Revolver springs were designed by a expert spring designer from F1 among many other disciplines of racing.
If you haven't seen the idle tuning thread posted it's worth a look.
Revolver is a small company and I think the result gotten with thier cams caused a mad rush on them and they were not prepared with a large stock. I know they are eager to get more cams back in stock.
A lot of R&D went into the grind for the Revolvers. They are not in it to make a buck, they did it to make a better cam then what was being offered.
What a lot of people don't know is the Revolver springs were designed by a expert spring designer from F1 among many other disciplines of racing.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ht=idle+tuning
