Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Stop Production On Evo 9??? Wtf!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #16  
DreamLike1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by EVO-8-Nate
The EVO9 was just a gap filler. I don't want to break any hearts here but welcome to the world of the 1996 300ZX TT. Nissan made changes to that car as well right before the end and so you had a different engine that wasn't compatible with most of the other years of the Z and therefore everything had a much higher cost. If they do change the engine in the EVOX then the EVO9 will be the only year with that specific engine.

I wouldn't buy one for that very reason. You would be better off finding a good used VIII. Of course this is just my opinion.

-Nate
ehh, I think the biggest change in the 1996 300zx TT was OBDII (all previous Z's had OBDI which was much more modable). But all evo's use OBDII software so thats not something to worry about.

I also cant agree with you just because of how awsome and modable the 9's are. Time and time again they make the kind of HP that 8's need cams for.
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 07:29 PM
  #17  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by EVO-8-Nate
Actually the Z's at best stock were only at 280hp for all years.
Well, I know Nissan called them all 300hp cars (320 was a mistake I made, thinking they got an hp bump midcycle like the Supra and 3000GT did) however, I have heard the '96 was less powerful. How can you take away something as essential as VVT and expect to maintain power especially under more stringent emissions requirements?

The comparison was more for the EVO9 having an engine that is different than all other EVO's.
It is still a 4G63. It is still one of the world's most popular tuner cars. It still has hella smart people working round the clock all over the world to make them faster.

When the EVOX comes out all will be forgotten about the EVO9 because they will want to break the X in right. Hence the EVO9 was just a gap filler between the VIII and X. I am pretty sure that I am right on this one.
You are using your opinion to predict the future and stating it as fact. To say the car is just a "gap filler" implies it brings nothing new to the table as far as performance is concerned. It may not be as big a change from III to IV, or VI to VII, but so what? There were baby steps between several other Evo models as well.
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 08:41 PM
  #18  
EVO-8-Nate's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Okinawa, Japan
I never stated it as fact you just read into it as such. It has always just been my opinion. BTW, There are a lot of differences between the EVO9's 4G63 and an VIII's. More than MIVEC....

I bet you that I will be spot on in my opinions. BTW, you seem to be reading way to far into my analysis and completely missing the point that I am trying to make. Have I not articulated myself clearly enough for you?

Right now the 9 is the sh$t, stock for stock. But when the EVOX comes with a completely new engine I think that the EVO9 will lose the support of the aftermarket. If I were a tuner and had to choose were to put my money I wouldn't invest it into 1 year that was different than the rest. I would continue with the well proven VII and VIII and move on to the X.

-Nate
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 09:30 PM
  #19  
Methodical4u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
I just put a deposit on a new RS and they told me they could get me any EVO I wanted... better call some other dealerships before you believe the bs that some will give you because they can't get something.
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 09:39 PM
  #20  
JDMevoBOOST's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco
All evos will lose value when the 10 comes out.....thats what happens when any car gets a new body style.....all of the people that think that evo 9's are going to be some miracle car that sustains its brand new price over time are delusional.....

The ONLY car recently that has done something even remotely similar is the Integra Type-R.....and that is only because it was a limited numbered car with number plates.....

I bought my ITR new in 2001 for 27K and even with 20,000 miles on it and four years later people were still getting 23-24K for them.....1997 Type-R's with less than 1000 miles sold for 24K last year.....

The evo simply has too many out there to become one of these rare vehicles that maintain value.....

As far as the 8 being worth more than the 9.......pfffft 9 surpasses the 8 in every category from interior...to the turbo....to the engine itself
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 09:44 PM
  #21  
wickedpapercut's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Texas
get a evo 9 first mod should be transfer case to TRE :-d
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 10:00 PM
  #22  
Methodical4u's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by JDMevoBOOST
All evos will lose value when the 10 comes out.....thats what happens when any car gets a new body style.....all of the people that think that evo 9's are going to be some miracle car that sustains its brand new price over time are delusional.....

The ONLY car recently that has done something even remotely similar is the Integra Type-R.....and that is only because it was a limited numbered car with number plates.....

I bought my ITR new in 2001 for 27K and even with 20,000 miles on it and four years later people were still getting 23-24K for them.....1997 Type-R's with less than 1000 miles sold for 24K last year.....

The evo simply has too many out there to become one of these rare vehicles that maintain value.....

As far as the 8 being worth more than the 9.......pfffft 9 surpasses the 8 in every category from interior...to the turbo....to the engine itself

There's low mileage 8's all over ebay all going for under 23... so they aren't worth more for sure.
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 11:11 PM
  #23  
4Gsixty3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Lawrenceville NJ
Originally Posted by wickedpapercut
get a evo 9 first mod should be transfer case to TRE :-d
Hey is it true the IX's TC is weaker? my cousin just blowed his TC with only 11K miles on his car! (yes he knows how to drive, his previous car was a 94 TSI AWD.) Seems to see more and more blown TC on the IXs nowadays.
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 11:15 PM
  #24  
EVO-8-Nate's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Okinawa, Japan
Originally Posted by JDMevoBOOST
All evos will lose value when the 10 comes out.....thats what happens when any car gets a new body style.....all of the people that think that evo 9's are going to be some miracle car that sustains its brand new price over time are delusional.....

The ONLY car recently that has done something even remotely similar is the Integra Type-R.....and that is only because it was a limited numbered car with number plates.....

I bought my ITR new in 2001 for 27K and even with 20,000 miles on it and four years later people were still getting 23-24K for them.....1997 Type-R's with less than 1000 miles sold for 24K last year.....

The evo simply has too many out there to become one of these rare vehicles that maintain value.....

As far as the 8 being worth more than the 9.......pfffft 9 surpasses the 8 in every category from interior...to the turbo....to the engine itself
Who said that the 8 was worth the same amount as the 9????? Are you reading the same thread, just curious, I didn't see what you were talking about.

Stock for stock the 9 out performs the 8 but after a new turbo and cams they are back in the same league. So unless you are staying stock then buy the 8. If you like the interior that much then buy it off of a wrecked one. There will be plenty believe me.

-Nate

Last edited by EVO-8-Nate; Aug 12, 2006 at 11:17 PM.
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 12:49 AM
  #25  
UCSD EVO mr's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: sd
hahaha who the heck plans on staying stock after they get an evo???

ehh... nm i been running stock for almost 3 months.... but not plannin to stay stock.
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 08:50 AM
  #26  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by EVO-8-Nate
I never stated it as fact you just read into it as such. It has always just been my opinion. BTW, There are a lot of differences between the EVO9's 4G63 and an VIII's. More than MIVEC....
What are these "lots of differences". The cylinder head design was imporved for better cooling and it has MIVEC. That's it. The turbo changed, but that's not part of the engine, and almost every Evo has a slightly different turbo then the one before it.

BTW, you seem to be reading way to far into my analysis and completely missing the point that I am trying to make. Have I not articulated myself clearly enough for you?
No. Because it doesn't make any sense. I see no parrallels between the '96 300ZX and the '06 Evo IX. None whatsoever. One was a crippled car on its way out of production that performed worse then the ones before it and at the time there were no plans to replace it in this country. The other is currently the best Evo that can be bought and there are plans for a new model designed to be better then it. Just because it isn't possible for AMS or somebody to build a 1000whp IX because standalones don't work with yet doesn't make the IX a gap filler car. Mitsubishi doesn't build their cars for the aftermarket tuners, they build them to be the best stock, or with mild bolt ons as we see in the FQ series. It just happens to work out well that the cars become aftermarket demons with crazy horsepower. The cars we get are compromised some for emissions and US regs, but I imagine a car like an FQ320 with a tuned Ralliart ECU and mild bolt ons is the well balanced machine Mitsubishi really wants the Evo to be, and the changes they made to IX make it even better.

Last edited by GPTourer; Aug 13, 2006 at 08:57 AM.
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 10:03 AM
  #27  
Mercenary3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 678
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
Originally Posted by GPTourer
What are these "lots of differences". The cylinder head design was imporved for better cooling and it has MIVEC. That's it. The turbo changed, but that's not part of the engine, and almost every Evo has a slightly different turbo then the one before it.



No. Because it doesn't make any sense. I see no parrallels between the '96 300ZX and the '06 Evo IX. None whatsoever. One was a crippled car on its way out of production that performed worse then the ones before it and at the time there were no plans to replace it in this country. The other is currently the best Evo that can be bought and there are plans for a new model designed to be better then it. Just because it isn't possible for AMS or somebody to build a 1000whp IX because standalones don't work with yet doesn't make the IX a gap filler car. Mitsubishi doesn't build their cars for the aftermarket tuners, they build them to be the best stock, or with mild bolt ons as we see in the FQ series. It just happens to work out well that the cars become aftermarket demons with crazy horsepower. The cars we get are compromised some for emissions and US regs, but I imagine a car like an FQ320 with a tuned Ralliart ECU and mild bolt ons is the well balanced machine Mitsubishi really wants the Evo to be, and the changes they made to IX make it even better.
I think all he is saying is that if the X comes out soon, the IX is at risk of not having a fully developed aftermarket base, or less than that of the VIII and dsm's. You said it yourself, standalones arent available yet, and if the X comes out, some companies that have options available for the VIII might never bring something to market and just start development on the X. Cams for the IX are still very expensive, and might always be expensive if companies like HKS, Buddy Club, Comp, Jun, etc dont bring a product to the market to drive down price. A lot of companies were working on many products for the VIII long after the IX came out, and still are. And I'm sure the top JDM companies are going to race to be first to market on a lot of the typical aftermarket componenets for the X.

The IX is a better machine. And it will have products to support it. It just may (nothing is for sure) not have the full barrage of support that the VIII's did that facilitate low prices and many options.

Last edited by Mercenary3; Aug 13, 2006 at 10:06 AM.
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #28  
KawRider's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: South Fla
Evo X

You are going to feel not so smart when the X comes out with only a slightly changed version of the 9 engine. ... It is called the Evolution after all. I do however agree that it is smart to not move from the 8 to the 9 just due to common sense... the cars are very close to each other in performance. And boy am I ever having problems getting parts for my 9 which is soooo different.


Originally Posted by EVO-8-Nate
Actually the Z's at best stock were only at 280hp for all years. The comparison was more for the EVO9 having an engine that is different than all other EVO's. It will be the only year with that engine (MIVEC). The same way as the 1996 Z was(Minus VVTC)/ more complicated ECU and numerous other costly little differences. The huge problem with this was the after market support. When the EVOX comes out all will be forgotten about the EVO9 because they will want to break the X in right. Hence the EVO9 was just a gap filler between the VIII and X. I am pretty sure that I am right on this one.

Then you must think of the price involved in R&D for tuning it. Hell the Cams are still at least double the price of the VIII's.

I almost traded in my VIII for a 9 and then I started thinking about it and I came to that conclusion. I would either stay with the well proven VIII or move on to the newly refined X.

Of course this is just my opinion and should be looked at as such, who the hell am I anyway.

-Nate
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #29  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Mercenary3
It just may (nothing is for sure) not have the full barrage of support that the VIII's did that facilitate low prices and many options.
And I understand that. But there is a lot of area between what you are saying and what he is. So what if cams stay expensive? So what if there never is a standalaone? If no one can ever build a 800WHP+ example, that means the car is a failure in some way? JUN has a 500whp+ example right now IIRC. Cams are expensive for a lot of cars, we are just lucky that 5-600 is all it takes for most of ours, it doesn't make it gospel or set in stone that its supposed to be that way. Again, the '96 Z does not have the clout the IX does.

For me, I think having a 400whp machine that is as docile as a stock car with a quick spooling turbo is a great acomplishment. And if I owned a IX and knew that I'd never have the cool factor of being able to shell out 3 grand for a standalone so I could run a GT42 would not keep me up at night. Because I'm not going to do it with my '05. If I wanted to do that I'd buy a used repo'd '03 from an auction, gut it - and go drag racing. I don't know of any fast evos with ACD. So I guess maybe '05's are stop gap filler too, right? What about AYC? More filler I guess.

Mitsubishi does not build cars for the aftermarket. The target for the EVO X is to beat the EVO IX, that is all.
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 10:20 AM
  #30  
teknishnIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Marana, AZ
Originally Posted by EVO-8-Nate
The EVO9 was just a gap filler. I don't want to break any hearts here but welcome to the world of the 1996 300ZX TT. Nissan made changes to that car as well right before the end and so you had a different engine that wasn't compatible with most of the other years of the Z and therefore everything had a much higher cost. If they do change the engine in the EVOX then the EVO9 will be the only year with that specific engine.

I wouldn't buy one for that very reason. You would be better off finding a good used VIII. Of course this is just my opinion.

-Nate
Actually, I disagree with this thinking. The Evo9 was more than just a gap filler... it is the highest refined version of the current platform. They have made numerous improvements to it over the VIII. The current platform has years of aftermarket modding, tuning, and experience to go with it and the IX is the pinacle of this platform.

I have no doubt the X will be great. However, its a new car from the ground up. There is no aftermarket for it, no vast amounts of experience in modding and tuning it.... etc etc. It is also rumor'd that it will cost significantly more. I bought the IX specifically because of this.


Quick Reply: Stop Production On Evo 9??? Wtf!!!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:41 AM.