Objective Test Data for Buschur Filter vs. Stock Airbox
#1
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Clarkston, MI
Objective Test Data for Buschur Filter vs. Stock Airbox
An EVO friend and I did a little experiment at work today. We’re both engineers at a company that makes OEM automotive parts, including intake air systems. Utilizing the flow test equipment normally used to test OEM designs, we evaluated the stock EVO intake (w/a K&N drop-in panel filter) compared to the Buschur filter. Both setups had the stock MAF bolted on.
The stock intake was tested in three ways: normal, without ram air duct/scoop, and without any filter.
Both the K&N and the Buschur filters are used, but have been fairly recently cleaned.
Pressure drop is reported in inches of H2O.
Results:
Item...............inH2O@350cfm........inH2O@400cf m
Buschur....................5.26................... ......6.46
OEM........................13.36.................. .....17.22
OEM (no filter)........9.24.......................not tested
OEM (no scoop).......9.76.......................not tested
The Buschur filter shows a whopping 61%-62% reduction in pressure drop compared to a stock system w/K&N panel filter!
The stock system can flow almost as well w/out the scoop as it does with no filter at all! (a 27% improvement over stock) Of course, you would be sucking hotter air, but it definitely means that there is power to be gained by increasing the area of the scoop (add another scoop on the other side of the airbox, perhaps?).
The Buschur setup was very, very loud during the test (almost painfully so). The MAF itself was generating a high pitched whistle noise. The stock setup does a very good job dampening this whistle, which gets about twice as loud when you remove the scoop.
Anyway, we were hoping to finally put to bed the constant argument of the stock airbox being better than aftermarket units. Of course, there are other considerations (smooth airflow into the MAF to get stable mixture readings, hot air underhood, etc.), but in terms of overall flow, the stock system isn’t nearly as good as the Buschur unit.
Now Mr Buschur, feel free to send us a free part or two for objectively proving the quality of your parts. We were thinking a pair of LICP’s would be nice!
The stock intake was tested in three ways: normal, without ram air duct/scoop, and without any filter.
Both the K&N and the Buschur filters are used, but have been fairly recently cleaned.
Pressure drop is reported in inches of H2O.
Results:
Item...............inH2O@350cfm........inH2O@400cf m
Buschur....................5.26................... ......6.46
OEM........................13.36.................. .....17.22
OEM (no filter)........9.24.......................not tested
OEM (no scoop).......9.76.......................not tested
The Buschur filter shows a whopping 61%-62% reduction in pressure drop compared to a stock system w/K&N panel filter!
The stock system can flow almost as well w/out the scoop as it does with no filter at all! (a 27% improvement over stock) Of course, you would be sucking hotter air, but it definitely means that there is power to be gained by increasing the area of the scoop (add another scoop on the other side of the airbox, perhaps?).
The Buschur setup was very, very loud during the test (almost painfully so). The MAF itself was generating a high pitched whistle noise. The stock setup does a very good job dampening this whistle, which gets about twice as loud when you remove the scoop.
Anyway, we were hoping to finally put to bed the constant argument of the stock airbox being better than aftermarket units. Of course, there are other considerations (smooth airflow into the MAF to get stable mixture readings, hot air underhood, etc.), but in terms of overall flow, the stock system isn’t nearly as good as the Buschur unit.
Now Mr Buschur, feel free to send us a free part or two for objectively proving the quality of your parts. We were thinking a pair of LICP’s would be nice!
Last edited by Rob W.; Sep 13, 2006 at 06:18 PM. Reason: Fixed type in subject title
Trending Topics
#9
Sorry for the noobie question... so pressure drop on intake is good?
Im thinking of putting a couple of holes on the top of the intake box, do you think that would help increase the airflow and gain more power?
Im thinking of putting a couple of holes on the top of the intake box, do you think that would help increase the airflow and gain more power?
#11
One other consideration is the "ram air" effect of the scoop on the stock airbox. The fact that the inlet of the scoop is in a high pressure area would have a significant effect on pressure inside the airbox.
-Paul
-Paul
#12
Originally Posted by Rob W.
Results:
Item...............inH2O@350cfm........inH2O@400cf m
Buschur....................5.26................... ......6.46
OEM........................13.36.................. .....17.22
OEM (no filter)........9.24.......................not tested
OEM (no scoop).......9.76.......................not tested
PSI conversion
Item...............PSI@350cfm........PSI@400cfm
Buschur....................0.19................... ......0.23
OEM..........................0.48................. ........0.62
OEM (no filter)........0.33.......................not tested
OEM (no scoop).......0.35.......................not tested
#13
Originally Posted by goBYeBYe
Sorry for the noobie question... so pressure drop on intake is good?
I'm thinking of putting a couple of holes on the top of the intake box, do you think that would help increase the airflow and gain more power?
I'm thinking of putting a couple of holes on the top of the intake box, do you think that would help increase the airflow and gain more power?
This was purely a pressure test. Like others have mentioned there are several other factors that may determine the efficiency of the intake/filter.
#14
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Clarkston, MI
As MIevo8MR said, our next test is to compare intake air temps with the stock setup vs. the Buschur (using EvoScan). I will try an idle test and driving test with each filter on the same day to compare results. My Buschur filter should be here in the next week or so, so I'll just do it at the same time I'm doing the install.
#15
Wow, very nice test. So you mean I haven't been lieing to the people here on EVOm as some recent people have accused me of in my testing of parts!! What shock, I AM NOT A LIAR!! haha
Thanks for posting the results.
If I sent you something for a positive test it would look like a payoff for doing it. I'll take care of that via. PM!! haha
Thanks for again for the test.
Thanks for posting the results.
If I sent you something for a positive test it would look like a payoff for doing it. I'll take care of that via. PM!! haha
Thanks for again for the test.