Dsm?
Sep 19, 2006, 08:32 AM
#4
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by byron3636
Is the evo considered a DSM?
People often use the term "DSM" loosely (and improperly) to refer to all 4g63-powered cars such as the Galant VR-4. However the Galant VR-4 was never a DSM product and neither is the Lancer Evolution.
Sep 19, 2006, 08:56 AM
#6
Originally Posted by aklucsarits
DSM = Diamond Star Motors = a joint engineering and production venture between Chrysler and Mitsubishi to build cars in Normal, Il. The initial product of this venture was the Talon/Laser/Eclipse.
People often use the term "DSM" loosely (and improperly) to refer to all 4g63-powered cars such as the Galant VR-4. However the Galant VR-4 was never a DSM product and neither is the Lancer Evolution.
People often use the term "DSM" loosely (and improperly) to refer to all 4g63-powered cars such as the Galant VR-4. However the Galant VR-4 was never a DSM product and neither is the Lancer Evolution.
+1 excelent
Sep 19, 2006, 11:44 AM
#7
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: LI NY
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by aklucsarits
DSM = Diamond Star Motors = a joint engineering and production venture between Chrysler and Mitsubishi to build cars in Normal, Il. The initial product of this venture was the Talon/Laser/Eclipse.
People often use the term "DSM" loosely (and improperly) to refer to all 4g63-powered cars such as the Galant VR-4. However the Galant VR-4 was never a DSM product and neither is the Lancer Evolution.
People often use the term "DSM" loosely (and improperly) to refer to all 4g63-powered cars such as the Galant VR-4. However the Galant VR-4 was never a DSM product and neither is the Lancer Evolution.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
