Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Stroker Kits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2003 | 04:02 AM
  #1  
value's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
Stroker Kits

Man everyone coming out with stroker kits now. I've seen 2.3 L kits out now from Toda and Bozz These cars are going to have sooo many parts out there
Old May 13, 2003 | 05:24 AM
  #2  
Dubai_EvoVII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: United Arab Emirates
2.3l damn... that is good....
If I can wait for one more year we probebly get a 3.0 liter Evolution and be sure to get 800+ easily
Old May 13, 2003 | 10:20 AM
  #3  
ShapeGSX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
I just found a link that shows that the JUN stroker kit for the Evo is really just a reground stock Mitsubishi crank. BAD idea. The cranks are hardened from the factory. The hardening doesn't penetrate very deep. So if you grind the stock crank for a longer stroke, you lose the hardened bearing surface. And if you re-harden, it is very hard to get even penetration. And you end up hardening surfaces of the crank that are already hardened. This could cause the crank to get brittle and weaken.

On top of this, grinding the stock pins means that the resulting pins will be smaller. They will have a smaller bearing surface, and will be weaker because of their size.

Believe it or not, a MUCH better idea is to use a 4G64 2.4L block from the start. The 2.4L crank will work fine. The 4G64 is NOT a stroker. It has a pretty good rod/stroke ratio (as opposed to a stroked ratio). And the only real difference between a 4G63T block and a 4G64 block is the addition of oil squirters on the 4G63T. It has been shown that you can run without oil quirters. Or you can retrofit them to the 4G64. The other major difference is the deck height, which is obviously taller on the 4G64.

I'm not 100% sure that the latest 4G64 block is compatible with the Evo's 4G63 head and gasket. However, all other generations of head and block can be exchanged fairly easily. So it may just work with the Evo.
Old May 13, 2003 | 01:14 PM
  #5  
ShapeGSX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
Here you go:
http://www.junauto.co.jp/products/cy.../index.html?en

MITSUBISHI 4G63 85.5x94.0mm 1029M-M001 2.2L (Shaved Crankshaft)
Old May 13, 2003 | 01:36 PM
  #6  
rdrkt's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Reading, Pa
I have a 4g64 in my DSM with a Garrett 60-1 stage 3 wheel and .82 ar exhaust housing it spools up that big turbo like a pin wheel.

ShapeGSX: Why not just use a 7bolt 4g64 crank? It isnt ideal as far as r/s ratio goes but I think it would be easier than getting a whole 64 block in there.
Old May 13, 2003 | 01:46 PM
  #7  
ShapeGSX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
Originally posted by rdrkt
I have a 4g64 in my DSM with a Garrett 60-1 stage 3 wheel and .82 ar exhaust housing it spools up that big turbo like a pin wheel.

ShapeGSX: Why not just use a 7bolt 4g64 crank? It isnt ideal as far as r/s ratio goes but I think it would be easier than getting a whole 64 block in there.
That will work, and people have done it. But I thought that it ended up moving the piston wrist pin up into the rings. As well, I have heard "somewhere" that the 4G64 crank in a 4G63 block (gives 2.3L) ends up causing accelerated cylinder bore wear due to the R/S ratio and the short skirt pistons required. That may have been related to the type of piston they used, though.

I'm no stroker expert, though. I'll stick to 2.0L, like the fast guys run...except Marco, who will eventually own us all.
Old May 13, 2003 | 01:58 PM
  #8  
rdrkt's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Reading, Pa
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
I have heard "somewhere" that the 4G64 crank in a 4G63 block (gives 2.3L) ends up causing accelerated cylinder bore wear due to the R/S ratio and the short skirt pistons required.
FYI It happens on the 64 too although not as bad.

Last edited by rdrkt; May 13, 2003 at 02:03 PM.
Old May 13, 2003 | 02:29 PM
  #9  
value's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
I just found a link that shows that the JUN stroker kit for the Evo is really just a reground stock Mitsubishi crank

I don't think so. Here is what that crank looks like when the start shaving.
Attached Thumbnails Stroker Kits-juncrank.jpg  
Old May 13, 2003 | 02:34 PM
  #10  
ShapeGSX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
Are you sure about that? Because that isn't a crank for a Mitsubishi.
Old May 13, 2003 | 02:55 PM
  #11  
value's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
I've been to their shop and watched them making them. Same goes for Tomei making cams. 60 year old guys who been doing nothing but making engine parts all their lives. Jun is one of the most respected tuners in Japan. How could they put their name on a stock crank and expect it to handle 600-700 hp some of the tuners run over in Japan.
Old May 13, 2003 | 03:00 PM
  #12  
ShapeGSX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
I did some digging on their web site. They make a distinction between shaving crankshafts and forging crankshafts. I assumed that "shaving" meant that they shave a stock crank. I was incorrect. Shaving means that they shave the crank out of billet, rather than forging a crank.

My mistake. No need to worry, Claudius.
Old May 16, 2003 | 11:13 PM
  #13  
jfh's Avatar
jfh
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
I did some digging on their web site. They make a distinction between shaving crankshafts and forging crankshafts. I assumed that "shaving" meant that they shave a stock crank. I was incorrect. Shaving means that they shave the crank out of billet, rather than forging a crank.

My mistake. No need to worry, Claudius.
I belive that what they do is shave a crank from a forged billet.

edit: I guess that's not true as they offer both a forged crank and a shaved (billet) crank. I find this surprising as most performance cranks are forged pieces for the increased strength:weight properties the forging process offers.

Last edited by jfh; May 17, 2003 at 10:42 AM.
Old May 17, 2003 | 08:09 AM
  #15  
Dubai_EvoVII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: United Arab Emirates
This is a stupid question..

If I want to converte my EVO to 2.2 what should I do other than getting the Stroker kit.. I know if I just installed it strate away my engine will fail I obviously need to change the ECU which I already did.. Is their any thing eles I should do ..
And is it a good idea to keep every thing stock except for the ECU and ex. and put on the 2.2 stroker it on the car . or is it a bad idea..

Thanks



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:55 PM.