Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Car & Driver: 10 Quickest Cars 0f 2007 - $25,000 to $30,000

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2007, 12:28 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Geese1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northwestern, PA
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car & Driver: 10 Quickest Cars 0f 2007 - $25,000 to $30,000

... and lookee what made the number one spot...


http://www.caranddriver.com/features...-to-30000.html

The Quickest Cars of 2007: $25,000 to $30,000.

Tenth Place: Subaru Forester 2.5XT
Ninth Place: Pontiac Grand Prix GXP
Eighth Place: Pontiac Solstice GXP/Saturn Sky Red Line (manual)
Seventh Place: Chevrolet Impala SS
Sixth Place: Nissan 350Z
Fifth Place: Mazdaspeed 6
Fourth Place: Subaru Legacy 2.5GT
Third Place: Pontiac Solstice GXP/Saturn Sky Red Line (automatic)
Second Place: Ford Mustang GT
First Place: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution RS

BY JARED HOLSTEIN, PHOTOGRAPHY BY AARON KILEY, MORGAN SEGAL, AND THE MANUFACTURERS

For all the coolness of a car that goes 180 mph, that has about as much relevance to the average driver in this country as a 180-foot yacht. Accelerating from a start, on the other hand, is sort of legal in every state in the U.S., barring law-enforcement officers with an inflated sense of purpose (don't ask how we know about "Unsafe Start" statutes).

Below are the 10 quickest vehicles available with a base price between $25K and $30K, ranked in order of 0-to-60-mph time. Ties were settled first by quarter-mile time, then by which was quicker to the highest speed both cars achieved (usually 120 or 130 mph), in that order. Most cars at this price point offer basic luxury or at least decent amenities and looks in addition to speed, as buck-banger boy-racer models are thousands less, maybe having something to do with the fact that burger-flipper wages haven't budged in nine years.


There's an arms race among auto manufacturers, with weapons of displacement, compression, and boost being waged segment- and industry-wide. It's no surprise that most entries in this list are not cut from traditional sports-car cloth; of the 10 vehicles here, one is an SUV and six have four or more doors.
First Place: The Quickest Cars of 2007: 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution RS

Base price: $29,774 (2006)
0-to-60-mph time: 5.1 sec
Quarter-mile time: 13.5 sec @ 103 mph

The mighty Lancer Evo IX, Mitsubishi's Cinderella, launches onto this list as the quickest and most expensive vehicle, barely making the $30K cut. And this is for the stripper RS version (sheds weight, not clothes), which foregoes amenities such as power windows and locks, a radio, sound deadening, and the gigantesque rear wing. Most every superlative has been showered on the Evo family barring "beautiful," and it remains one of the most delicious driving machines money can buy, at any price.

The Evo is quick, but it barely squeaked its way onto this list. Technically, there are no 2007 Evos (as we await the '08 Evo X, due in about a year), but Mitsubishi officials assured us that there are plenty of 2006s still available, so here it is.

We posted a 5.1-second 0-to-60 time, a slower figure than earlier cars, in which we've gotten to 60 mph in the four-second range. Optimal launches require quite a bit of clutch slip, and as soon as Mitsubishi announced its company-wide 10-year mechanical warranty, the Evo received a 5000-rpm rev limiter when stopped to promote a less warranty-involving launch.

The World Rally Championship, for which the Evo was born, features standing starts, so the AWD drivetrain is up to the abuse; there, 7000-rpm clutch drops are the norm. The Evo packs just two liters of displacement (stemming from FIA rally regulations), every cubic centimeter of which is packed with up to an astonishing 20.1 psi of compressed air and fuel via a twin-scroll turbocharger. Assisted by MIVEC variable valve timing, the engine produces 286 horsepower and 289 lb-ft of torque, distributed by a five- or six-speed transmission, a transfer case, and any of three limited-slip differentials.

All that power is mated to an unexpected four-door chassis (you may remember the econocar Mirage), fitted with a superb unequal-length control-arm, forged-aluminum suspension; sticky Yokohama Advan tires; and Brembo brakes on all four corners.

Mashing the accelerator going straight will impress you less than squeezing the throttle on corner exit, the car meeting your request with equal parts dreamy steering, endless grip, and gut-churning thrust.

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, 4-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan

BASE PRICE: $29,774 (2006)

ENGINE TYPE: turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 16-valve inline-4, iron block and aluminum head, port fuel injection
Displacement: 122 cu in, 1997cc
Power (SAE net): 286 bhp @ 6500 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 289 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 5-speed manual

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 103.3 in
Length: 178.5 in
Width: 69.7 in
Height: 57.1 in
Curb weight: 3291 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 5.1 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 12.5 sec
Zero to 140 mph: 32.7 sec
Street start, 5-60 mph: 6.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 13.5 sec @ 103 mph
Top speed (redline limited): 148 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 155 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.94 g

FUEL ECONOMY:
EPA city/highway driving: 19/25 mpg
Old Jan 3, 2007, 12:43 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
inco9nito99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Roselle, IL
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ix Rs ...
Old Jan 3, 2007, 12:47 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
 
Juice33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool post dude. I didn't realize the RS' sticker price was that high! I thought it was in the $27000 range. Hell, I got my IX GSR for less than the sticker of the RS.
Old Jan 3, 2007, 12:48 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
inco9nito99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Roselle, IL
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
$25k is what I paid...
Old Jan 3, 2007, 12:50 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Geese1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northwestern, PA
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Juice33
Cool post dude. I didn't realize the RS' sticker price was that high! I thought it was in the $27000 range. Hell, I got my IX GSR for less than the sticker of the RS.
Neither did I, to be honest.

I think we've all been spoiled by the prices offered by places like South Coast...
Old Jan 3, 2007, 12:51 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
cloudy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont like how they categorized the price range. Should of done $35,000 and lower. Just so we can have another test showing the Evo comes out ontop of the STi.
Oh and did they run a Evo VIII or IX? Cause the picture is a VIII, and I though IX's trapped at 105ish stock?
Old Jan 3, 2007, 01:00 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
mac_05evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They need better drivers for the times though, 13.5 @ 103 mph?? come on, they can do better than that!
Old Jan 3, 2007, 01:06 PM
  #8  
Newbie
 
dpetro64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes...I win again!
Old Jan 3, 2007, 01:09 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
saiyanzzrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
isnt 0 - 60 in 5.1 wrong?
Old Jan 3, 2007, 01:24 PM
  #10  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
joshesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Soquel, CA
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How are the 06 STI's doing a 13.0 1/4 mile time stock? Has anyone scene a bone stock 06 IX vs 06 STI 1/4 mile race?
Old Jan 3, 2007, 01:27 PM
  #11  
Evolving Member
 
Evo2k6Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mount Juliet, TN
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The IX is listed at 4.4 for 0-60, so the RS should be somewhere in that neighborhood as well. 5.1 seems a bit high.


But as for the original article, was there really a doubt?
Old Jan 3, 2007, 01:32 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
PessimiStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They said they are slipping the clutch to launch, which isn't exactly optimal unless it's just a wording misunderstanding.
Old Jan 3, 2007, 01:34 PM
  #13  
Evolving Member
 
TeamTurtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Elk Grove
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
350z behind MS3 and the Mustang?
Old Jan 3, 2007, 01:49 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 2,046
Received 75 Likes on 65 Posts
What's BS about this is that the Sky/Solstice is on there twice (auto and manual)... the 350 would eat the Mustang, MS6 and the Redline up.
Old Jan 3, 2007, 01:54 PM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
thatguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: milfburn
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by saiyanzzrage
isnt 0 - 60 in 5.1 wrong?
With a bad launch sounds about right.


Quick Reply: Car & Driver: 10 Quickest Cars 0f 2007 - $25,000 to $30,000



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:21 PM.