Idiot cut me off in the snow....so i t-boned him
Feb 3, 2007, 08:48 AM
#19
He didnt hit the guy from the back. If you hit someone from the back you are at fault and that's why your state law is setup that way. The majority of rear ending accidents are because someone wasnt paying attention at all or because they were following too close although there is the deliberate act of slamming on your brakes so you can get rear ended (insurance fraud).
But back to this accident... he T-boned him because the guy was crossing over his lane by blowing a stop sign. The front of his car hit the side of the vehicle that crossed his right of way.
Some accidents are just unavoidable, glad your car wasnt damaged too much and that nobody was injured.
Feb 3, 2007, 09:41 AM
#21
Why? He drove on tires that turn into skis in the snow. He went to a mall, of all things, and that was solely his choice. If another emergency situation took place, he would not be able to turn his wheel and have the car follow. That put innocent folks in danger due to pure selfishness and stupidity.
Please feel free to call me by my username.
He smashed his car due to a lack of control driven by his tires and an apparent inability to control his vehicle. He shouldn't have been out there in the first place.
Christ
....he smashed his car because some kit ran through an intersection. Its bad enough as it is.
Feb 3, 2007, 09:47 AM
#22
Why? He drove on tires that turn into skis in the snow. He went to a mall, of all things, and that was solely his choice. If another emergency situation took place, he would not be able to turn his wheel and have the car follow. That put innocent folks in danger due to pure selfishness and stupidity.
Please feel free to call me by my username.
He smashed his car due to a lack of control driven by his tires and an apparent inability to control his vehicle. He shouldn't have been out there in the first place.
Please feel free to call me by my username.
He smashed his car due to a lack of control driven by his tires and an apparent inability to control his vehicle. He shouldn't have been out there in the first place.
Feb 3, 2007, 10:51 AM
#23
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why? He drove on tires that turn into skis in the snow. He went to a mall, of all things, and that was solely his choice. If another emergency situation took place, he would not be able to turn his wheel and have the car follow. That put innocent folks in danger due to pure selfishness and stupidity.
Please feel free to call me by my username.
He smashed his car due to a lack of control driven by his tires and an apparent inability to control his vehicle. He shouldn't have been out there in the first place.
Please feel free to call me by my username.
He smashed his car due to a lack of control driven by his tires and an apparent inability to control his vehicle. He shouldn't have been out there in the first place.
Feb 3, 2007, 10:58 AM
#24
man, leave the guy alone... who cares if he was on advans...
and that accident wont show up on a carfax.. if its only a hood... no biggie
i was rear ended and needed only a new bumper. when i traded it in didnt come up on carfax and they couldn't tell...
i would see if he can pay it cash. better off if u dont claim it with insurance
cheers!
and that accident wont show up on a carfax.. if its only a hood... no biggie
i was rear ended and needed only a new bumper. when i traded it in didnt come up on carfax and they couldn't tell...
i would see if he can pay it cash. better off if u dont claim it with insurance
cheers!
Feb 3, 2007, 10:58 AM
#25
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He woulda probably hit him regardless. But those who run the advans in winter are just asking for trouble. Should probably just run some Hoosiers in the rain, ya might get better traction than running the advans in the snow.
