Wingless = Better MPG?
#1
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 1
From: Norwalk, CT
Wingless = Better MPG?
Well since i went wingless about a week or so ago, I've noticed that I'm getting at least 20 more miles on this tank. Anyone else have any experience like this? I was averaging a horrible 160-165, this tank i got at least 180 in. I have been driving the same, same gas and same weather.
Anyone else?
Anyone else?
#2
You wernt driving as aggressivly I think, but it could have something to do with it, less downforce at speed, less strain on the drivetrain, less resistance for the motor, equals better gas mileage?
#4
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 1
From: Norwalk, CT
Thats what im thinking. My driving habits were the same. Shifting at or under 3500. Only really hit boost 2 or 3 times. But i seem to be getting more mileage out of the car without a wing. About 50% of the driving is on the highway.
#6
It is reasonable to assume that the small reduction in aerodynamic drag from removing the wing would have a slight effect on fuel economy. But I would expect the improvement in fuel economy to be approaching statistically insignificant levels, not the 10% improvement that you report seeing...
There must be other factors involved for you to see that kind of fuel economy improvement.
There must be other factors involved for you to see that kind of fuel economy improvement.
#7
It is reasonable to assume that the small reduction in aerodynamic drag from removing the wing would have a slight effect on fuel economy. But I would expect the improvement in fuel economy to be approaching statistically insignificant levels, not the 10% improvement that you report seeing...
There must be other factors involved for you to see that kind of fuel economy improvement.
There must be other factors involved for you to see that kind of fuel economy improvement.
Trending Topics
#8
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 1
From: Norwalk, CT
I'm going to guess that vehicle speed also plays a part. If you average a higher speed than others, your drag will cause a more drastic affect on your mpg. But my lord, you only get 160 with shifts at 3.5k? I drive pretty much identically to your style and get 220-230 with the winter blend.
I also find it hard to believe that taking a wing off would cause that much of a jump in mpg.
#10
Well since i went wingless about a week or so ago, I've noticed that I'm getting at least 20 more miles on this tank. Anyone else have any experience like this? I was averaging a horrible 160-165, this tank i got at least 180 in. I have been driving the same, same gas and same weather.
Anyone else?
Anyone else?
#14
#15
When I purchased the EVO I had now it had the OZ wing and I did notice better MPG. Somewhere in the range of 15-20 more miles per tank. Damn it costs a lot to have that EVO look.