Boost response with our SF GT42 kit
#18
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
Forgive me if I sound negative, but I am seeing 1.5 bar as early as 5800? If boost was set at 2.0 bar is looked like it would reach that boost around 6200? That would be very laggy for anything other than a race car. Looks like typical big turbo lag to me. 35R can reach 2.0 bar at 4300 without divided manifold setup.
Its posts like these that get people all hyped up to get a big laggy turbo. then after they spend a furtune setting up a big turbo they find its really not very enjoyable at all. Then they want to just sell the car.
The car would be far more potent with 35r turbo. Not knocking shearer here. He makes awesome manifolds. Just get sick of people buying a bigger turbo than they need then not being happy.
Its posts like these that get people all hyped up to get a big laggy turbo. then after they spend a furtune setting up a big turbo they find its really not very enjoyable at all. Then they want to just sell the car.
The car would be far more potent with 35r turbo. Not knocking shearer here. He makes awesome manifolds. Just get sick of people buying a bigger turbo than they need then not being happy.
#20
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Reno
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forgive me if I sound negative, but I am seeing 1.5 bar as early as 5800? If boost was set at 2.0 bar is looked like it would reach that boost around 6200? That would be very laggy for anything other than a race car. Looks like typical big turbo lag to me. 35R can reach 2.0 bar at 4300 without divided manifold setup.
Its posts like these that get people all hyped up to get a big laggy turbo. then after they spend a furtune setting up a big turbo they find its really not very enjoyable at all. Then they want to just sell the car.
The car would be far more potent with 35r turbo. Not knocking shearer here. He makes awesome manifolds. Just get sick of people buying a bigger turbo than they need then not being happy.
Its posts like these that get people all hyped up to get a big laggy turbo. then after they spend a furtune setting up a big turbo they find its really not very enjoyable at all. Then they want to just sell the car.
The car would be far more potent with 35r turbo. Not knocking shearer here. He makes awesome manifolds. Just get sick of people buying a bigger turbo than they need then not being happy.
#23
and, for the last time i hope, Norris's engine get the turbo up to FULL (2.7bar!!) by 5K. in the vid of his engine on the dyno it makes OVER 700lbsft by 4940rpm!
jp@shearerfab i checked out your site and OMG you guys do some amazing work! i see why norris is using your stuff.
Chris.
#25
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
JP thats awesome
I own one of shearers GT42 manifolds and all I can say is that it is an absolute work of art... JP I thought you were going to put my car on your website
here is an example of the perfection
warren
I own one of shearers GT42 manifolds and all I can say is that it is an absolute work of art... JP I thought you were going to put my car on your website
here is an example of the perfection
warren
Last edited by antilag_200; Jun 7, 2007 at 10:50 AM.
#27
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
Then we must be watching two different videos. I am not seeing a fast spooling turbo. stabbing the throttle at those rpms with 35r would result in boost response 4 times faster than that 42r. I have built enough 35r and 67r cars to know that. Obviously it is you who lack any real world experience.
Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Jun 7, 2007 at 12:37 PM.