I thought Evoscan supported 2byte load? Tuning / logging as you said Mellon is much more accurate with 2byte load. The difference sometimes can be interesting

 

correct, evoscan and mitsulogger both support 2byteload which is the best way to view load. The problem is that not everyone has done that mod so they rely on load calculations which can be innacurate. My other point was that mitsulogger has a place to fill in the values for upgraded injectors while evoscan does not....at least not an easy way to do it for people that aren't computer savy.

even load calc isn't perfect, I still reference the timing value logged vs rpm to determine where I need to be looking in the fuel/timing maps.

 

Does evoscan gives you a AFR readings?

 

if you have a wb02 setup for logging.. yes

 

i paid for evoscan, but i still use mitsulogger.


also if you lose your serial, just email the guy, he can look up your email and send you a serial key. i should know, ive lost mine a couple times LOL.

 

I used mitsulogger for setting up larger injectors because it logs the fuel trims and has an easy interface for filling in the new injector scale and latencies for calculated load. However, 2byteload is much more accurate for that latter.

my old version of evoscan doesn't log the fuel trims correctly and you have to modify the program to view calculated load correctly when you upgrade the injectors. I hope both of these issues will be corrected in the new flavor.

 

Semi related, but i ordered the 1.3 tactrix cable from limitless so i could connect and scan with evoscan, as well as use ecuflash. I ordered the cable almost a week ago and have nothing yet. How long does it usually take to get that cable? Is there anywhere else i can go to get one of these cables that will connect up?

 

www.tunertools.com tell Lloyd Mellon Tuning sent ya