Whats good product to monitor A/F's
Oct 25, 2007, 04:36 PM
#32
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tri-State Area
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i use the innovate lm-1 with the lma-3. it can do so many things i can hardly use it but im slowly getting better. i also read the AEM UGEO wasnt that great even though alot of people use it.
Oct 25, 2007, 08:41 PM
#33
Can the Zeitronix be easily and successfully used with EvoScan?
I was one of the first buyers of the Innovate and had it in my previous car for a number of years. I just got real tired of the LM-1 and the LMA-3 taking up my entire glove box. I want something less bulky and more space friendly.
I was one of the first buyers of the Innovate and had it in my previous car for a number of years. I just got real tired of the LM-1 and the LMA-3 taking up my entire glove box. I want something less bulky and more space friendly.
Oct 26, 2007, 01:00 AM
#35
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have always used plx m300 and really liked it. I have heard that FJO is pretty much the best (very expensive though) and a lot of people like the innovative. I too haven't heard anything great about the AEM. Good Luck!
Oct 29, 2007, 11:01 AM
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (58)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i use LM-1 innov. and its good. its abit clunky but accuracy wise, i like it and everytime i read reviews, innov always comes close to pro wideband accuracy so its good enough for me.
Oct 29, 2007, 12:00 PM
#40
It all matters what you need. here is my post from a different thread..
"The min. setup with the Zeitronix cost $279, but it logs AFR, TPS, RPM and an user input right out of the box. With additional MAP and EGT sensor , it can also log boost and EGT. Dont get me wrong, I have this setup and I liked it. And before the days of EVOscan it was a great logging system.
But if you just need to get AFR into your EVOscan logs, the the $199 LC-1 is better, as it only logs AFR out the box. You can log everything the Zeitronix can with the LC-1 but you need additional sensors and another thing (lm3 i think), which will cost more then just getting a zeitronix and sensors..
So its like this, If you need a whole system, zeitronix is more bang for the buck. if you just need to get AFR into your EVOScan logs, then the LC-1 is cheaper.
Also, people will argue all day which is better (TTP And Nj come to mind), but I could care less. Theres been tests that said both are the best and the other one sucks. But what really matters is that theres people going fast, very fast with both WBs. So, i dont think one is better, its just about taste and needs."
"The min. setup with the Zeitronix cost $279, but it logs AFR, TPS, RPM and an user input right out of the box. With additional MAP and EGT sensor , it can also log boost and EGT. Dont get me wrong, I have this setup and I liked it. And before the days of EVOscan it was a great logging system.
But if you just need to get AFR into your EVOscan logs, the the $199 LC-1 is better, as it only logs AFR out the box. You can log everything the Zeitronix can with the LC-1 but you need additional sensors and another thing (lm3 i think), which will cost more then just getting a zeitronix and sensors..
So its like this, If you need a whole system, zeitronix is more bang for the buck. if you just need to get AFR into your EVOScan logs, then the LC-1 is cheaper.
Also, people will argue all day which is better (TTP And Nj come to mind), but I could care less. Theres been tests that said both are the best and the other one sucks. But what really matters is that theres people going fast, very fast with both WBs. So, i dont think one is better, its just about taste and needs."
