Official EVO Insurance Thread
#1187
Evolved Member
After 2010 (so 2011+), the rating scale was revised but applicable only to newer cars (and not a revising of all cars in history) and went up to 100 or so. So that's why a lot of companies had higher rates for the 2011s and later, even though they're practically the same cars as the earlier models. But the rating given to the later Evo Xs due to its performance and/or loss history was a rating that is normally reserved for higher priced cars (basically $80k or more, as you noticed), and on the insurance agent interface, you have to put in a value for the cost new. However, regardless of what the car really costs new, the systems I've seen require a value no lower than $80k, because the programming assumes that any car with that rating must be on the higher end of the spectrum in terms of price. Unfortunately it doesn't mean that if your car is totaled, you will get $80k. You'd still get just actual cash value.
#1189
Evolved Member
But it's not in the rating software (like if you're talking about FSC or Quomation), it's in the agency interface itself. I know what he's talking about since I've seen it with a few companies. I can take some screen captures.
#1199