Stock Turbo IX achieves 431whp/442wtq
Jul 4, 2008 | 04:12 PM
#49
lol
Jul 16, 2008 | 11:09 AM
#51
Now if I added "on"I few years back and I worked at a shop that purchased the 2nd AWD dyno Mustang built and sold.
At the time I had a Integra Type R (all motor, 220 WHP 2.1 talldeck stroker) to a best of 13.4 on the dyno at 105.......I backed it the next day at the track with a 13.3 @ 105
It is much harder to launch on the dyno than than at the track......and the car bucks on a hard shift.
Matt
I would still like to see some track times for the 431whp
Jul 16, 2008 | 11:19 AM
#52
YES I am sure you can't race them against each other Now if I added "on"
I few years back and I worked at a shop that purchased the 2nd AWD dyno Mustang built and sold.
At the time I had a Integra Type R (all motor, 220 WHP 2.1 talldeck stroker) to a best of 13.4 on the dyno at 105.......I backed it the next day at the track with a 13.3 @ 105
It is much harder to launch on the dyno than than at the track......and the car bucks on a hard shift.
Matt
I would still like to see some track times for the 431whp
Now if I added "on"I few years back and I worked at a shop that purchased the 2nd AWD dyno Mustang built and sold.
At the time I had a Integra Type R (all motor, 220 WHP 2.1 talldeck stroker) to a best of 13.4 on the dyno at 105.......I backed it the next day at the track with a 13.3 @ 105
It is much harder to launch on the dyno than than at the track......and the car bucks on a hard shift.
Matt
I would still like to see some track times for the 431whp
My car has 433hp I ran a 11.2 @ 119.5 on the Dyno, but I short shifted on my 2-3 shift so didnt get the right momentum. But all and all its great practice tool so you can get an idea what you might be running.
Jul 16, 2008 | 12:00 PM
#54
We have noticed that on this Dyno. Is pretty accurate. Customer that run 12.2-12.4 where in the same range when they tried it. same thing with some that where running 11.8-11.9 and they ran the same with the same mph.
My car has 433hp I ran a 11.2 @ 119.5 on the Dyno, but I short shifted on my 2-3 shift so didnt get the right momentum. But all and all its great practice tool so you can get an idea what you might be running.
My car has 433hp I ran a 11.2 @ 119.5 on the Dyno, but I short shifted on my 2-3 shift so didnt get the right momentum. But all and all its great practice tool so you can get an idea what you might be running.
Jul 16, 2008 | 02:14 PM
#56
The only problem with these runs is that the 60's are pretty far off, which is making the ET artificially low, but the traps seem to be right on par. That seems to be the only thing that needs adjustment. Both Felix and Ryan had 1.4s, which do not seem close to reality.
Jul 16, 2008 | 03:52 PM
#57
The only problem with these runs is that the 60's are pretty far off, which is making the ET artificially low, but the traps seem to be right on par. That seems to be the only thing that needs adjustment. Both Felix and Ryan had 1.4s, which do not seem close to reality.
Take into consideration that the car is strapped down on the Dyno. That helps to get better traction and a better 60ft.
Jul 16, 2008 | 04:17 PM
#58
Indeed. Thank you for being reasonable with your reply. I am not sure why some others result in closer 60's - not sure if it's AWD-specific or not, since I haven't seen enough examples.
Jul 16, 2008 | 04:59 PM
#59
The weight is higher than actual on that sheet so the trapspeed would be higher.