next mod?
#18
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Listen I'm not getting into the debate about high or low reading dynos. The 2 evo 9's which i watched being tune both made 370. One had stock IC and the other AMS, both had LICP, Fuel pump, intake, and a great tuner who knew what he was doing. The fact of the matter is I heard either on thhis forum that DynoJet is the US standard for chassis dyno. Cams on a evo 9 on stock turbo is over kill.
#21
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lancaster PA
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Charlie (kreionic) made approx 440 whp on our low MD, on the stock clutch into 3X,000 miles....
no launches, but I know he drove on the stock clutch for some time that way...
no launches, but I know he drove on the stock clutch for some time that way...
#24
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the OP, I would, depending on how far you plan to take the car, skip the S1's, as they are a mild upgrade. If you ever want to run a BT and make 500+ you'd be better off with S2's or Kelford 272 or 280's.
For reference, I think the new S2's are 274/278 on their cams.
#25
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: connecticut
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A friend of mine just made 512whp on stock 30k mile clutch, and it drives fine. It's all on how you drive the car (i.e. aggressive launching).
For the OP, I would, depending on how far you plan to take the car, skip the S1's, as they are a mild upgrade. If you ever want to run a BT and make 500+ you'd be better off with S2's or Kelford 272 or 280's.
For reference, I think the new S2's are 274/278 on their cams.
For the OP, I would, depending on how far you plan to take the car, skip the S1's, as they are a mild upgrade. If you ever want to run a BT and make 500+ you'd be better off with S2's or Kelford 272 or 280's.
For reference, I think the new S2's are 274/278 on their cams.