Twin turbo evo-- is this a repost?
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: pensacola
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Twin turbo evo-- is this a repost?
i understand why they are only making 483hp @ 29psi but something doesn't seem right.. i think what they were after was all out engine response and drivability what do you guys think?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvJVUS-8jlw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvJVUS-8jlw
Last edited by evo9nuuub; Jul 25, 2010 at 02:08 PM.
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
I am not sure who loses 24% through the drivetrain other than a car with an auto, but it seems that a 2,4 MIVEC motor with a smaller turbo could make very similar numbers. Perhaps not on pumpgas but I dont see too many people who would spend the money for that setup racing on pumpgas and limiting themselves.
Trending Topics
#14
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
twin turbo has great potential to make a broad power band. but from what I have seen the only dyno results that are impressive are the ones from norris designs. he hasnt released info on the setup yet. but his had the flattest, broadest 600ft tq I have seen to date. the results from this car here dont look a whole lot better than a well setup FP black. from what I have seen everyone keeps using too large of a primarary turbo. 50 trim size. so they end up with 50 trim like boost curve. the primary turbo needs to be smaller than a 16g if you want to get a broad low/high rpm power band. there a guy on DSM forums that used a 16g as primary but it has been over a year and a half and he hasnt sorted it well enough to get a dyno session done.
"if the answer is simple, God is answering"
I have yet to see a heavenly setup/result......
"if the answer is simple, God is answering"
I have yet to see a heavenly setup/result......