Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Blew my motor!! so much for the FP Black on the stocker!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2010, 05:12 PM
  #31  
ILE
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
ILE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good reason to upgrade to the X.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 05:36 PM
  #32  
Jp7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Jp7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 1,686
Received 107 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by ILE
Good reason to upgrade to the X.
Upgrade?
Old Nov 19, 2010, 06:02 PM
  #33  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
BenJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ILE
Good reason to upgrade to the X.
I definitely do not consider the evo x an upgrade. They went away from what the evo was originally designed to be and turned it into a more friendly/comfortable car.

I can understand the movement financially, but for no other reason. That being said, I would love to see an evo x RS that came in at around 3000lbs.

Back on topic though...looks like the OP is a good candidate for a 4g64 block and either a destroked 2.1 or 2.4
Old Nov 19, 2010, 07:01 PM
  #34  
Jp7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Jp7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 1,686
Received 107 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by BenJ
I definitely do not consider the evo x an upgrade. They went away from what the evo was originally designed to be and turned it into a more friendly/comfortable car.

I can understand the movement financially, but for no other reason. That being said, I would love to see an evo x RS that came in at around 3000lbs.

Back on topic though...looks like the OP is a good candidate for a 4g64 block and either a destroked 2.1 or 2.4
why 4g64? I thought it was more displacement but less strength.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 07:36 PM
  #35  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
BenJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jp7
why 4g64? I thought it was more displacement but less strength.
The 46g4 is an iron block, just like the 63. It is a very strong block and costs a fraction of the 63.
Old Nov 19, 2010, 08:17 PM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
whtrice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,349
Received 55 Likes on 49 Posts
My rod exited through the block in the same manner on number 4. Seems that is the rod that likes to chuck most frequent. My rod bolts were still firmly attached to the bottom section of the rod left on the crank. No sign of bearing or fastener failure. E-85 with a FP OG 'green'.
Oh btw...415 whp & 400 wtq on a MD . Lasted a couple years though....lol

In the process of getting a built 2.4L installed in my IX RS. GLW your build.
Old Nov 20, 2010, 06:50 AM
  #37  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
bbyevo8u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
sorry to hear that man, time for a 2.4! where did the fire start?
Old Nov 20, 2010, 08:37 AM
  #38  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
munster87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there a hole on both sides or just one?
Old Nov 20, 2010, 08:39 AM
  #39  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
EvoJoeIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Jp7
why 4g64? I thought it was more displacement but less strength.
not at all. buschur uses a 4g64 block in his 9 sec evo.....
Old Nov 20, 2010, 09:15 AM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
binh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EvoJoeIX
not at all. buschur uses a 4g64 block in his 9 sec evo.....
not anymore...i'm pretty sure hes back to a 4g63
Old Nov 20, 2010, 09:19 AM
  #41  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
EvoJoeIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i think when he ran the 9.0 he was on 2.4... thats what i meant
Old Nov 21, 2010, 06:08 PM
  #42  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
EvolutionVIIIrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Union County, NJ
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xexitenglishx
Another jersey guy haha sorry to hear about your car...where were you on the parkway? I was out doing pulls around 12am at exit 138... oh man were you right by the clark exit? i think i passed by you as i was doing some pulls..there were like 3 troopers there?

anyways good luck with the build...im waiting till my engine does so i have an excuse for a 2.4l
It was Parkway North between 137 and 138.. Round 10:30ish.. I only had the one Trooper.lol... I think im going to stay 2.0 and rev the **** out of it!!

Originally Posted by AboodsEvo
damn!! rebuild time with that 2.0 it will rev to the moon
Thats the plan!!
Originally Posted by 06MREvo
Damn sucks the motor blew...good luck with the new setup...looking forward to seeing it in action next year at etown..
Yes sir, ill be up to par then. built motor/trans/cage... Youll see someone running 10s on stock appearing thats not going to get kicked off the track!!

Originally Posted by ILE
Good reason to upgrade to the X.
I wouldnt drive an X if it was given to me. Just not my style. And theres not ONE thing in the X that id consider an "upgrade".

Originally Posted by BenJ
I definitely do not consider the evo x an upgrade. They went away from what the evo was originally designed to be and turned it into a more friendly/comfortable car.

I can understand the movement financially, but for no other reason. That being said, I would love to see an evo x RS that came in at around 3000lbs.

Back on topic though...looks like the OP is a good candidate for a 4g64 block and either a destroked 2.1 or 2.4
I completely agree about the X. I considered a 2.4, but ill take the high rev 2.0 being this is really a track only car..

Originally Posted by bbyevo8u
sorry to hear that man, time for a 2.4! where did the fire start?
Saw the flames thru the hood scoop. I think it was just the oil burning.. it was only flaming for about 2 or 3 minutes.

Originally Posted by munster87
Is there a hole on both sides or just one?
Got the motor completely out today. Theres another hole just as big in the back. #4 rod is gone!! Im going to add pictures very shortly.
Old Nov 21, 2010, 06:24 PM
  #43  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
EvolutionVIIIrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Union County, NJ
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, heres some pictures of the last two days work. Got the trans pulled yesturday thanks to the step by step on EvoMoto!! Anyway, got the out, and pulled the motor out today. Everything is labled, and has markings for all the harnesses. Ive decided that im ditching the AC, so ill have a couple of parts for sale at a later date.. On with the pictures!!







more to come!

Last edited by EvolutionVIIIrs; Nov 21, 2010 at 06:36 PM.
Old Nov 21, 2010, 06:28 PM
  #44  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
EvolutionVIIIrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Union County, NJ
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts





Last edited by EvolutionVIIIrs; Nov 21, 2010 at 06:41 PM.
Old Nov 21, 2010, 06:35 PM
  #45  
Newbie
 
basm917's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: JERZEY
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sry 2 hear daT dude


Quick Reply: Blew my motor!! so much for the FP Black on the stocker!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:19 PM.