372 Whp
Jan 15, 2004, 07:39 AM
#32
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno correction is one factor, I think you're right MP5 it is 1.4 but another factor is the pull was in 3rd gear. You also have a gear multiplier. Get a 4th gear pull and we'll see what the REAL numbers are.
Jan 15, 2004, 08:01 AM
#33
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Temecula, Ca.
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey rubelcon...ive always wondered who keeps that little excel spreadsheet with all the warnings??? some guy got a printout of every user with a little check mark next to it??? opps am i getting to close to the center of inteliigence known as "O.E.I" Office of EvolutionM Intelligence?? im gonna disappear now.....
Jan 15, 2004, 08:02 AM
#34
The HP does seem high for a 91 octane pull.
As far as going the pull in 3rd of 4th gear you guys are backwards. The HP on our Dynojet is always higher in a higher gear.
The numbers he is getting should go up when he dyno's in 4th gear.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
As far as going the pull in 3rd of 4th gear you guys are backwards. The HP on our Dynojet is always higher in a higher gear.
The numbers he is getting should go up when he dyno's in 4th gear.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Jan 15, 2004, 08:06 AM
#35
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
some one posted it's the correction factor. It's more like lack of correction factor. The guy should post an SAE corrected graph of wheel hp, he may have been reading actual whp or estimated flywheel hp. 398 definitely seems too high for his mods and 91 octane.
Jan 15, 2004, 08:11 AM
#36
For all of the people flaming him, he is only relating what the shop is telling him. Yea, they may have a correction factor going in order to estimate crank HP, but that doesn't mean that they told him that, hell, they are in the buisiness to impress him. This board can be like a bunch of ****ing jackels sometimes, people are always out there waiting to jump someone's ***. They told him his car was making X amount of HP, maybe he now has a little bit more information to go to them with in order to ask whether it is crank or wheels or if there is a correction factor etc. Or for all we know this shop could have stumbled onto the next big tuning discovery. Although I doubt that who the hell are we to say?
Jan 15, 2004, 08:17 AM
#38
Originally posted by davidbuschur
The HP does seem high for a 91 octane pull.
As far as going the pull in 3rd of 4th gear you guys are backwards. The HP on our Dynojet is always higher in a higher gear.
The numbers he is getting should go up when he dyno's in 4th gear.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
The HP does seem high for a 91 octane pull.
As far as going the pull in 3rd of 4th gear you guys are backwards. The HP on our Dynojet is always higher in a higher gear.
The numbers he is getting should go up when he dyno's in 4th gear.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Jan 15, 2004, 08:19 AM
#40
In Timeout
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kennesaw Ga
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same here, I think the key is looking for a 1:1 I did one in 3rd and one in 4th and you are right 3rd = 20+- HP.
Originally posted by MP5
What??? Maybe cause you cant induce a load on your dyno But I can pull an easy 25 HP out of my butt on the local AWD mustang by pulling in 3rd instead of 4th
What??? Maybe cause you cant induce a load on your dyno But I can pull an easy 25 HP out of my butt on the local AWD mustang by pulling in 3rd instead of 4th
Jan 15, 2004, 08:19 AM
#41
Originally posted by evil8
some one posted it's the correction factor. It's more like lack of correction factor. The guy should post an SAE corrected graph of wheel hp, he may have been reading actual whp or estimated flywheel hp. 398 definitely seems too high for his mods and 91 octane.
some one posted it's the correction factor. It's more like lack of correction factor. The guy should post an SAE corrected graph of wheel hp, he may have been reading actual whp or estimated flywheel hp. 398 definitely seems too high for his mods and 91 octane.
Jan 15, 2004, 08:23 AM
#42
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Boulder, Co.
Posts: 1,767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MP5
Its the software correction factors that is used on that dyno. Who knows what its set at 1.4? time and a half?
Its the software correction factors that is used on that dyno. Who knows what its set at 1.4? time and a half?
Jan 15, 2004, 08:33 AM
#43
Originally posted by joeycoates
For all of the people flaming him, he is only relating what the shop is telling him. Yea, they may have a correction factor going in order to estimate crank HP, but that doesn't mean that they told him that, hell, they are in the buisiness to impress him. This board can be like a bunch of ****ing jackels sometimes, people are always out there waiting to jump someone's ***. They told him his car was making X amount of HP, maybe he now has a little bit more information to go to them with in order to ask whether it is crank or wheels or if there is a correction factor etc. Or for all we know this shop could have stumbled onto the next big tuning discovery. Although I doubt that who the hell are we to say?
For all of the people flaming him, he is only relating what the shop is telling him. Yea, they may have a correction factor going in order to estimate crank HP, but that doesn't mean that they told him that, hell, they are in the buisiness to impress him. This board can be like a bunch of ****ing jackels sometimes, people are always out there waiting to jump someone's ***. They told him his car was making X amount of HP, maybe he now has a little bit more information to go to them with in order to ask whether it is crank or wheels or if there is a correction factor etc. Or for all we know this shop could have stumbled onto the next big tuning discovery. Although I doubt that who the hell are we to say?
Last edited by Zeus; Jan 15, 2004 at 08:38 AM.
Jan 15, 2004, 08:39 AM
#44
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by MP5
No they can put in correction factors to account for crank HP/ Sea Level cars/ Moon dyno charts anything really SAE is going to be low low cause he is far up in the air
No they can put in correction factors to account for crank HP/ Sea Level cars/ Moon dyno charts anything really SAE is going to be low low cause he is far up in the air
Jan 15, 2004, 09:43 AM
#45
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 398 run WAS with the Ntercooler sprayer, my run without the sprayer was 344 WHP 351 Torque. I don't really understand why everyone insist's on flaming, I will post dyno chart's as soon as I find someone to scan them for me. I'm not bull****ting here. I don't know about the correction or whatnot, but I will ask next time I get a chance.