372 Whp
Jan 15, 2004, 12:17 PM
#61
Originally posted by TURBODAWG
I wonder how much power you could make in 1st gear then????
The 25HP increase defeats many laws of physics. Oh well, what did those old farts know anyhow.
If all Mustang dyno's do this, then they have a fundamental flaw in their design. If thats the case, then the Dynojet is definitely the more accurate of the two.
Brian
I wonder how much power you could make in 1st gear then????
The 25HP increase defeats many laws of physics. Oh well, what did those old farts know anyhow.
If all Mustang dyno's do this, then they have a fundamental flaw in their design. If thats the case, then the Dynojet is definitely the more accurate of the two.
Brian
Jan 15, 2004, 12:24 PM
#62
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not saying I don't believe you. I said that this would mean there is a fundamental design problem with the Mustang dynos. Meaning that their numbers may be from MARS as well. That is all. Can you get full load in 2nd gear then? I would think so. Give that a shot next time.
Brian
Brian
Jan 15, 2004, 10:50 PM
#64
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Boulder, Co.
Posts: 1,767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SaitouhHajime
The 398 run WAS with the Ntercooler sprayer, my run without the sprayer was 344 WHP 351 Torque. I don't really understand why everyone insist's on flaming, I will post dyno chart's as soon as I find someone to scan them for me. I'm not bull****ting here. I don't know about the correction or whatnot, but I will ask next time I get a chance.
The 398 run WAS with the Ntercooler sprayer, my run without the sprayer was 344 WHP 351 Torque. I don't really understand why everyone insist's on flaming, I will post dyno chart's as soon as I find someone to scan them for me. I'm not bull****ting here. I don't know about the correction or whatnot, but I will ask next time I get a chance.
You, in a way, are responsible for the flaming you received. Look back to yesterday and I posted I thought you must have been using a N20 sprayer that was the only explanation. BTW nice numbers WITHOUT the N20. Stage 1+ cars turned 345/360 numbers on the same dyno back in December 
....tick tock, tick tock, tick tock.....we're all waiting
Jan 13, 2006, 09:23 AM
#67
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virgina Beach, VA
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I found this interesting. Granted, i'm not very versed in the turbo = xhp, but i hope not everyone is basing this off stock turbo numbers. I read and was questioning as well, but in his signature he has listed a RNR GT35R turbo kit. I read that this turbo really doesnt come alive til youre over 24 psi and he stated he was running 21. I also understand that he was running 91 vice 93 or higher and I honestly dont know what the expected HP would be with those. just my .02
Jan 13, 2006, 09:40 AM
#68
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll vouch for the dyno that SaitouhHajime is on. Its the same one I use and Nick (the tuner at Mac) is awsome. My buddy with just a TBE and ECU in his 05 STi was tuned by Nick on the same dyno that SaitouHajime is using and was able to pull 300hp and about 340tq. No other mods. So I wouldn't cry BS on this untill the dyno sheets are posted.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4G63pride
Evo X Dyno Results
11
May 18, 2012 04:14 PM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
202
Oct 3, 2008 12:09 AM
