"411whp 400ft/lbs dyno sheet inside"
Feb 13, 2004, 07:18 PM
#36
Misleading report...
...Interesting chart but...
I noticed, from the attached picture, that the car was strapped over the front-wheels only, which means you measured front-wheel power, and, that my friend, skews up your numbers quiet nicely.
In essence, you got 411 whp with 100 oct (I suppose no cat), 26-to-23 psi of boost and 272 cams... on a two-wheel drive dyno...
That power level translates into (probably) 380 wheel horsepower on a 4wd Dynojet platform which, with your boost levels and cams, can be obtained a slimmer mods. portfolio.
Look at the top range of the power and torque curve. There is a dramatic torque fall-off, which looks to me like limited intake or exhaust flow, considering that you have the cam gears in place.
Just my two cents...
I noticed, from the attached picture, that the car was strapped over the front-wheels only, which means you measured front-wheel power, and, that my friend, skews up your numbers quiet nicely.
In essence, you got 411 whp with 100 oct (I suppose no cat), 26-to-23 psi of boost and 272 cams... on a two-wheel drive dyno...
That power level translates into (probably) 380 wheel horsepower on a 4wd Dynojet platform which, with your boost levels and cams, can be obtained a slimmer mods. portfolio.
Look at the top range of the power and torque curve. There is a dramatic torque fall-off, which looks to me like limited intake or exhaust flow, considering that you have the cam gears in place.
Just my two cents...
Feb 13, 2004, 07:59 PM
#38
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Misleading report...
Originally posted by vulcan
...Interesting chart but...
I noticed, from the attached picture, that the car was strapped over the front-wheels only, which means you measured front-wheel power, and, that my friend, skews up your numbers quiet nicely.
In essence, you got 411 whp with 100 oct (I suppose no cat), 26-to-23 psi of boost and 272 cams... on a two-wheel drive dyno...
That power level translates into (probably) 380 wheel horsepower on a 4wd Dynojet platform which, with your boost levels and cams, can be obtained a slimmer mods. portfolio.
...Interesting chart but...
I noticed, from the attached picture, that the car was strapped over the front-wheels only, which means you measured front-wheel power, and, that my friend, skews up your numbers quiet nicely.
In essence, you got 411 whp with 100 oct (I suppose no cat), 26-to-23 psi of boost and 272 cams... on a two-wheel drive dyno...
That power level translates into (probably) 380 wheel horsepower on a 4wd Dynojet platform which, with your boost levels and cams, can be obtained a slimmer mods. portfolio.
This AWD vs. 2wd stuff is getting annoying. I am trying to show people the possibilities of what these cars are made of with bolt ons and tuning.
Originally posted by vulcan
...Interesting chart but...
Look at the top range of the power and torque curve. There is a dramatic torque fall-off, which looks to me like limited intake or exhaust flow, considering that you have the cam gears in place.
Just my two cents...
...Interesting chart but...
Look at the top range of the power and torque curve. There is a dramatic torque fall-off, which looks to me like limited intake or exhaust flow, considering that you have the cam gears in place.
Just my two cents...
Last edited by kcevo; Feb 13, 2004 at 08:01 PM.
Feb 13, 2004, 10:44 PM
#39
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMS and Buschur uses the same type of dyno... Would you say their experience and results over the years mean anything?.. I think so..
What's really important in the end is that the car is well tuned for results on the tarmac... don't you agree?
The result that Chad got is about 30 horses more than AMS made (since at the time they were only tuning with an SAFC on their stock turbo evo8).. And AMS ran 11.85 at that setup.. Buschur ran 11.65 with probably close to about the same hp as Chad (never saw the final AEM dyno for that run though)
So, do you still think this is not a valid measure?
What's really important in the end is that the car is well tuned for results on the tarmac... don't you agree?
The result that Chad got is about 30 horses more than AMS made (since at the time they were only tuning with an SAFC on their stock turbo evo8).. And AMS ran 11.85 at that setup.. Buschur ran 11.65 with probably close to about the same hp as Chad (never saw the final AEM dyno for that run though)
So, do you still think this is not a valid measure?
Feb 13, 2004, 11:17 PM
#41
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
good job, Chad!
i will make sure that i see on St. Louis next time,
i miss the AMS meet,
anyway, i will be there on next Monday to dyno and tune.
also, consider it's stock USDM EVO8 turbo, the whole damn world know the boost drop closer to red line.
looking for a perfect dyno chart, go get a GT series turbo, you will see nothing before 3500~4k rpm.
EVO8Master, ppl using EMS with 272's won't have problem on idle.
Ben
i will make sure that i see on St. Louis next time,
i miss the AMS meet,
anyway, i will be there on next Monday to dyno and tune.
also, consider it's stock USDM EVO8 turbo, the whole damn world know the boost drop closer to red line.
looking for a perfect dyno chart, go get a GT series turbo, you will see nothing before 3500~4k rpm.
EVO8Master, ppl using EMS with 272's won't have problem on idle.
Ben
Feb 16, 2004, 04:31 PM
#43
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: aem ems
Originally posted by Evo8Master
Gotcha
B.T.W. What wheels are you running on your evo? Size? offset? God I love your pics on the dyno!!!Sweet
Gotcha
B.T.W. What wheels are you running on your evo? Size? offset? God I love your pics on the dyno!!!Sweet
