Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

6266 vs 6466

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2015, 09:26 AM
  #16  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
NSDQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBoz
I am a big fan of the smallest turbo to hit your HP goals. A turbo that spools faster a way more fun on the street. I am running a 3586 with a tial .63 hotside and I hit 20psi at 4600rpm in 3rd, and make 700whp at 32psi on e85. I am pretty sure I could have gone the 3582 on the 63 hotside and been able to touch the 700whp make also.
Yeah maybe but probably not much more. I'll probably see max 725-750 on my setup once I get dual pumps. I'm on a 3582 with .82. This turbo likes the 2.4 though.
Old Jan 6, 2015, 07:52 AM
  #17  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V8HAHA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tucson
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I moved from a 6266 to a 6466

6266= 702@39psi E85


6466= 787whp@42psi


There is lots left in the 6466. We are running a bit less timing on the 6466 because its a street car and wanted to keep it fairly safe. Could prob grab about 50 more out of it woth a few more PSI and a bit more timing. Don't let the lag fool you, the car revs to 9500rpm so their is no drop in power between shifts.
Old Jan 6, 2015, 10:52 AM
  #18  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
EVOjunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: York, PA
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6466 Fo Sho.
Old Jan 6, 2015, 01:04 PM
  #19  
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
FstAsVR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ausevo7
Don't mean to hi-jack the thread, I'm buying a gen2 6466 soon and tossing up between the t3 .82 or v band .82. Are there any benefits from choosing 1 over the other?

Vband is way lighter and less of a headache in my opinion.
Old Jan 8, 2015, 07:18 PM
  #20  
Newbie
 
Soccerinsider9's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Yuma
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would the 6466 be worth the price difference?
Old Jan 11, 2015, 08:48 PM
  #21  
Newbie
 
m3mods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Medford Oregon
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6466 vband ftw!
Old Jan 15, 2015, 12:17 PM
  #22  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
1wickedmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: JERSEY
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everyone forgets about the Gen2 option.

The 6466 only came Gen2.

Also another thing people forget about is. Motor/cam size/compression.

If car A has a 2.0 10.5:1 motor and kelford 280 and car B has 2.0 10.5:1 motor on kelford 272 the DYNAMIC compression from one to to the other changes depending on if the cars are degreed into the cam card.

This is not including, gasket thickness, combustion chamber changes (difference in CC if its a built head with combustion work), deck height, and how much was shaved off the head, and how can anyone forget the tuner lol.

I think its funny when people go bigger, and the car always sits at 550-600hp lol. Why not go smaller.

A gen2 6266 will make enough power to go mid low 9s. Easy high 9s.
Old Jan 15, 2015, 01:39 PM
  #23  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Viegasjuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern virginia
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1wickedmr
Everyone forgets about the Gen2 option.

The 6466 only came Gen2.

Also another thing people forget about is. Motor/cam size/compression.

If car A has a 2.0 10.5:1 motor and kelford 280 and car B has 2.0 10.5:1 motor on kelford 272 the DYNAMIC compression from one to to the other changes depending on if the cars are degreed into the cam card.

This is not including, gasket thickness, combustion chamber changes (difference in CC if its a built head with combustion work), deck height, and how much was shaved off the head, and how can anyone forget the tuner lol.

I think its funny when people go bigger, and the car always sits at 550-600hp lol. Why not go smaller.

A gen2 6266 will make enough power to go mid low 9s. Easy high 9s.
Yes...but from almost everyone's experience there's a very minimal loss in spool, if I recall correctly someone had a thread where they spooled the same....so the question is, why not go with the turbo with more potential if there's no downside?
Old Jan 15, 2015, 05:45 PM
  #24  
Newbie
 
Majakelong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6266 will for sure get you there.
Old Jan 15, 2015, 08:35 PM
  #25  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
aquaMan219's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am having my motor being built as we speak by boostin performance. 2.0LR 9.5:1 kelford 272 cams. port match intake ets twin t4 vband gen 2 6266 kit. all supporting mods are there. I am pretty confident that it will put down 700hp on the dyno. tuned on E 85 and 93. When It is all done I will post the results.
Old Jan 18, 2015, 04:07 PM
  #26  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
1wickedmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: JERSEY
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It will. To buy a 6466 to make 650-700 is it worth it. Not even including all the parts that break with the power. There isn't many people on here that would use the full potential of even a 6266. Most people buy a 62mm turbo, make 650hp at 32-34psi, then switch turbos because it didn't make what they wanted. Never go to the track, or just want a number to brag about. Efficent setups are better then big setups.
Old Jan 19, 2015, 03:54 AM
  #27  
Newbie
 
havran17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Green OH
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen 6266 make over 700 MD making power to 9,000rpm. This was in a v band kit on a 2.1L making 740hp MD @40psi.... You're going to want more though, so I would just get the 6466.
Old Jan 19, 2015, 08:04 AM
  #28  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Howulikemyevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando
Posts: 293
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have a 6266 jb t3 82ar on my 2.4L now, making 508hp/446tq at 28psi on pump 93.
Im lazy to put e85 in it and tune right now. My motor is fully built. Including fic 2150 injectors and BR double pumper for e85 ready.
But i want to make more power on pump so i just order a new 6466. It coming this thursday. Cant wait.

But to answer, with my jb turbo making that much hp on pumpgas. If u order a 6266bb turbo could be even better spool and will last longer than a jb turbo.
My tuner say i could hit 700hp easily with e85.
Old Feb 10, 2015, 06:42 PM
  #29  
Newbie
 
Rroberts1785's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just got the 6466 on a 2.3 stroker. cant wait for the results. great info thanks
Old Feb 10, 2015, 07:38 PM
  #30  
Newbie
 
evo98urv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: sharon wi
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6466 2.3 stroker 550whp on a very mild tune on 93 with 1000cc injectors. spools at 4000 all day. so I'd say go big more to expand


Quick Reply: 6266 vs 6466



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:21 PM.