Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Evolution VIII and MR Cd (Coefficient of Drag)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2004, 12:26 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
KnifeEdge_2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evolution VIII and MR Cd (Coefficient of Drag)

what is the Cd of the VIII GSR and the MR ?
i know the standard VIII GSR's Cd is lower than the VII GSR by 0.01 Cd and the MR is lower than the standard VIII GSR by .05 - .1 Cd but i dont know the VII's Cd so all that info is useless

can anyone shed some light on this?
Old Aug 22, 2004, 12:35 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
 
MisterSpoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Bedford, MA
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your decimals are off.

If the MR is lower, it'd be lower by 0.005 to 0.01. 0.1 is HUGE. That would be an amazing aerodynamic achievement that would make world news.
Old Aug 22, 2004, 12:43 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Mistasparkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think our CD is like 15
Old Aug 22, 2004, 12:44 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
1QWKEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Turkey Town (Gobble-Gobble)
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no i think our drag coef is like .29 don't quote me on that though...
Old Aug 22, 2004, 12:52 PM
  #5  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Mistasparkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sarcasm?
Old Aug 22, 2004, 01:09 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
 
MisterSpoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Bedford, MA
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWKEVO
no i think our drag coef is like .29 don't quote me on that though...
0.285 - 0.300 would sound right to me. That massive airdam isn't the most aerodynamic in the world.
Old Aug 22, 2004, 01:13 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I think our Cd is more like .31 or .32 or so. My old 350Z with Aero package was like .29 or .30. The Z without the Aero package is .31. There is no way in hell the EVO comes close the the Z's aero.

Last edited by EVOTEXAS; Aug 22, 2004 at 01:18 PM.
Old Aug 22, 2004, 01:36 PM
  #8  
gtr
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
gtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
cd .36

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/at...achmentid=8978

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=drag
Old Aug 22, 2004, 01:42 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
 
MisterSpoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Bedford, MA
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ha. Doesn't surprise me. We have a fast brick though!
Old Aug 22, 2004, 02:30 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
1QWKEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Turkey Town (Gobble-Gobble)
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the Sti's CD is .33 so I doubt are cars are as "brick shaped" as those cars are Our cars are pretty aerodynamic, we just happen to have alot of structures to aid in downforce and under the car things to aid in reducing lift
Old Aug 22, 2004, 02:40 PM
  #11  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
KnifeEdge_2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
I think our Cd is more like .31 or .32 or so. My old 350Z with Aero package was like .29 or .30. The Z without the Aero package is .31. There is no way in hell the EVO comes close the the Z's aero.
ferrari 360 is .335 dont trust ur eyes man, and i doubt the 350Z is .31, the NSX is .3 and the Z is way too fat to come close to that
Old Aug 22, 2004, 02:46 PM
  #12  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
KnifeEdge_2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1QWKEVO
the Sti's CD is .33 so I doubt are cars are as "brick shaped" as those cars are Our cars are pretty aerodynamic, we just happen to have alot of structures to aid in downforce and under the car things to aid in reducing lift
there is no way the sti can have a lower cd then the evo 8 or mr
the hood scoop itself must add .2 to the equation and dont even get me started with that bulbouse front end
Old Aug 22, 2004, 04:05 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by KnifeEdge_2K1
ferrari 360 is .335 dont trust ur eyes man, and i doubt the 350Z is .31, the NSX is .3 and the Z is way too fat to come close to that

I work for Nissan, pal. Plus I owned a Z. I think you are the one who is "trusting the eyes." The Z was designed in a wind tunnel. The Ferrari was designed on canvas. I know what I'm talking about. Don't forget it.
Old Aug 22, 2004, 04:06 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by KnifeEdge_2K1
there is no way the sti can have a lower cd then the evo 8 or mr
the hood scoop itself must add .2 to the equation and dont even get me started with that bulbouse front end
Clearly you are indeed going by what the car "looks like." Clearly, you have no idea what Cd is or how it is calculated.
Old Aug 22, 2004, 04:16 PM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
1QWKEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Turkey Town (Gobble-Gobble)
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by KnifeEdge_2K1
there is no way the sti can have a lower cd then the evo 8 or mr
the hood scoop itself must add .2 to the equation and dont even get me started with that bulbouse front end
You are incorrect, an object as it gets slicker through the air lowers it DC, and as it gains more drag so does it gain a larger DC. That is as per the definition and mathematical formula of drag coefficent


just to add a note as a compairison (taken off a website):

"The drag coefficient is a number that describes a characteristic amount of aerodynamic drag caused by fluid flow, used in the drag equation. Different objects with the same drag coefficient will behave in similar ways, after scaling for differences in size.
A cylinder is given a default drag coefficient of one. That means that two cylinders of the same size will have the same drag, one twice as large will have twice the drag. Less streamlined shapes will have higher values, while smoother shapes will have lower values.


Automobile Aerodynamics
The drag coefficient ("Cd") is a common metric in automotive design, where designers strive to achieve the lowest possible drag coefficient, and thus lowest possible drag.

This is done to improve fuel economy at highway speeds, where aerodynamic effects represent a substantial fraction of the energy needed to keep the car moving. It is also a factor in sports car design, where low drag, coupled with reduced lift, results in a car which can achieve stability and high top speeds.

The typical modern automobile achieves a drag coefficient of between 0.30 and 0.35. SUV's, with their larger, flatter shapes, typically achieve a Cd of 0.35-0.45. Sports cars can achieve figures of 0.25-0.30, although sometimes designers deliberately compromise drag, in favor of reducing lift."

Last edited by 1QWKEVO; Aug 22, 2004 at 04:22 PM.


Quick Reply: Evolution VIII and MR Cd (Coefficient of Drag)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:29 PM.