pictures of the vortex generator
Nov 6, 2004 | 12:18 PM
#4
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by platinumspecv
And what does this thing do?
11
1. Introduction
To save energy and to protect the global environment,
fuel consumption reduction is primary concern of
automotive development. In vehicle body development,
reduction of drag is essential for improving fuel
consumption and driving performance, and if an aerodynamically
refined body is also aesthetically attractive,
it will contribute much to increase the vehicle’s appeal
to potential customers.
However, as the passenger car must have enough
capacity to accommodate passengers and baggage in
addition to minimum necessary space for its engine and
other components, it is extremely difficult to realize an
aerodynamically ideal body shape. The car is, therefore,
obliged to have a body shape that is rather aerodynamically
bluff, not an ideal streamline shape as seen
on fish and birds. Such a body shape is inevitably
accompanied by flow separation at the rear end. The
passenger car body’s aerodynamic bluffness, when
expressed by the drag coefficient (C
D), is generally
between 0.2 and 0.5, while that of more bluff cubic
objects is greater than 1.0 and that of the least bluff bullets
is less than 0.1. Two elements that have major
influence on the drag coefficient of a bluff object are the
roundness of its front corners and the degree of taper
at its rear end. The importance of the influence of the
rear taper in passenger cars can be described as follows:
Fig. 1
schematically shows the flow around a sedan.
Because of the presence of a trunk at the rear, the flow
separates at the roof end and then spreads downward.
As a result, the flow around the car is similar to that
around a streamline-shaped object with a taper at the
rear. For this reason, a sedan with a trunk tends to have
smaller drag coefficient value than a wagon-type car.
In other words, taper at the rear has the effect of delaying
flow separation (or shifting the flow separation
point downstream).
A well-known example for intensifying the flow separation
delaying effect is utilizing a dimple (like the ones
on golf *****)
(1). Adding dimple-shaped pieces can lower
the C
D to a fraction of its original value. This is
because dimples cause a change in the critical Reynolds
number (the Reynolds number at which a transition
from laminar to turbulent flow begins in the boundary
layer). There are reported examples of aircraft wings
controlling the boundary layer, in which vortex generators
(hereinafter referred to as VG(s)) successfully
delayed flow separation even when the critical
Reynolds number is exceeded
(2).
Although the purpose of using VGs is to control flow
separation at the roof end of a sedan, it is so similar to
the purpose of using VGs on aircraft. To determine the
shape of sedan VGs, the data on aircraft VGs are
referred to
(2).
2. Mechanism of flow separation and objectives
of adding vortex generators
Fig. 2
shows a schematic of flow velocity profile on
the vehicle’s centerline plane near the roof end. Since
Research on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction
by Vortex Generators
Masaru KOIKE* Tsunehisa NAGAYOSHI* Naoki HAMAMOTO*
Abstract
One of the main causes of aerodynamic drag for sedan vehicles is the separation of flow near
the vehicle’s rear end. To delay flow separation, bump-shaped vortex generators are tested for
application to the roof end of a sedan. Commonly used on aircraft to prevent flow separation, vortex
generators themselves create drag, but they also reduce drag by preventing flow separation at
downstream. The overall effect of vortex generators can be calculated by totaling the positive and
negative effects. Since this effect depends on the shape and size of vortex generators, those on
the vehicle roof are optimized. This paper presents the optimization result, the effect of vortex
generators in the flow field and the mechanism by which these effects take place.
Key words:
Body, Aerodynamics, Aerodynamic Devices, Flow Visualization, Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD)
Fig. 1 Flow around a sedan
* Studio Package Engineering Department, Research & Development Office
12
Research on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction by Vortex Generators
the vehicle height in this section becomes progressively
lower as the flow moves downstream, an expanded
airflow is formed there. This causes the downstream
pressure to rise, which in turn creates reverse force acting
against the main flow and generates reverse flow at
downstream Point C. No reverse flow occurs at Point A
located further upstream of Point C because the
momentum of the boundary layer is prevailing over the
pressure gradient (dp/dx). Between Points A and C,
there is separation Point B, where the pressure gradient
and the momentum of the boundary layer are balanced.
As shown in
Fig. 2, in the lower zone close to the vehicle’s
surface within the boundary layer, the airflow
quickly loses momentum as it moves downstream due
to the viscousity of air. The purpose of adding VGs is
to supply the momentum from higher region where has
large momentum to lower region where has small
momentum by streamwise vortices generated from
VGs located just before the separation point, as shown
in
Fig. 3. This allows the separation point to shift further
downstream. Shifting the separation point downstream
enables the expanded airflow to persist proportionately
longer, the flow velocity at the separation
point to become slower, and consequently the static
pressure to become higher. The static pressure at the
separation point governs over all pressures in the entire
flow separation region. It works to reduce drag by
increasing the back pressure. Shifting the separation
point downstream, therefore, provides dual advantages
in drag reduction: one is to narrow the separation
region in which low pressure constitutes the cause of
drag; another is to raise the pressure of the flow separation
region. A combination of these two effects
reduces the drag acting on the vehicle.
However, the VGs that are installed for generating
streamwise vortices bring drag by itself. The actual
effectiveness of installing VGs is therefore deduced by
subtracting the amount of drag by itself from the
amount of drag reduction that is yielded by shifting the
separation point downstream. Larger-sized VGs
increase both the effect of delaying the flow separation
and the drag by itself. The effect of delaying the flow
separation point, however, saturates at a certain level,
which suggests that there must be an optimum size for
VGs.
3. Experimental methods
Evaluation of the effectiveness of VGs and optimization
were conducted using MMC’s full scale wind tunnel
(
3)
. The test section was closed and the main flow
velocity was set at 50 m/s. Mitsubishi LANCER EVOLUTION
VIII was used as the test vehicle. To evaluate the
effectiveness of VGs, six component forces of the vehicle
were measured and VGs’ optimum shape and size
were examined. Furthermore, in order to clarify the factors
contributing to the effect provided by VGs, the total
pressure distribution of the wake flow was measured
with pitot rake, the velocity distribution was measured
by the particle image velocimetry (PIV) method, and the
flow field was analyzed in detail using computational
fluid dynamics (CFD).
4. Finding the optimum VGs
To select appropriate shape and size of the VG
which generates streamwise vortex the most efficiently
(with the least drag by itself) is important to achieve
objectives.
In connection with the size, the thickness of the
boundary layer is measured based on the assumption
that the optimum height of the VG would be nearly
equal to the boundary layer thickness.
Fig. 4 shows the
velocity profile on the sedan’s roof. From this figure,
the boundary layer thickness at the roof end immediately
in front of the separation point is about 30 mm.
Consequently, the optimum height for the VG is estimated
to be up to approximately 30 mm.
As to the shape, a bump-shaped piece with a rear
slope angle of 25 to 30° is selected. This is based on the
fact that a strong streamwise vortex is generated on a
hatchback-type car with such rear window angle
(4). A
half-span delta wing shape is also recommended for the
VG. This shape is inferred from an aircraft’s delta wing
that generates a strong streamwise vortex at its leading
edge
(2).
As to the location of VGs, a point immediately
upstream of the flow separation point was assumed to
be optimum, and a point 100 mm in front of the roof end
was selected as shown in
Fig. 5. The effects of bumpshaped
VGs mounted at this point are presented in
Fig.
6
. The front half contour of the bump-shaped VG was
smoothly curved to minimize drag and its rear half was
cut in a straight line to an angle of approximately 27° for
maximum generation of a streamwise vortex.
the drag coefficient was smallest at the height of 20 to
25 mm, so a height in this range was considered optimum
for the VG. However, a taller VG might cause a
decrease in the lift. The rather small change in drag
coefficient resulting from change in height can be
accounted for as follows. As mentioned before, an
increase in height of the VG simultaneously causes two
effects: one is reduced drag resulting from delayed flow
separation and the other is increased drag by the VG
itself. These two effects are balanced when the VG’s
height is between 20 and 25 mm.
From these results, a reduction of C
D is 0.003 with
this bump-shaped VG when the shape and size are optimized.
The effectiveness of the delta-wing-shaped VG is
also examined. The recommended shape of the deltawing-
shaped VG is defined by the following
(2):
Length/height = 2
Yaw angle = 15°
Interval/height = 6
Based on this data, delta-wing-shaped VGs are created
with the following specifications:
Length/height = 2
Height = 15 mm, 20 mm and 25 mm (three types)
Thickness = 5 mm
The delta-wing-shaped VGs should be installed at a
yaw angle of 15° to the airflow direction. In order to
meet this condition, the direction of airflow at the roof
end was investigated by oil flow measurement. Airflow
direction was found to be different between sideways
positions on the roof. The airflow is aligned directly
with the backward direction at center of a car, but it
increasingly deviates toward the center as the measurement
point shifts away from the central position. For
this reason, the delta-wing-shaped VGs must be
installed at an angle of 15° against the vehicle centerline
for the central position, whereas they must be
installed at an angle near 0° for outermost positions.
The results of these tests are shown in
Fig. 7. Deltawing-
shaped VGs were found to be less sensitive to
change in height than bump-shaped VGs; the drag
reduction effects for the VGs of three different heights
Fig. 6 Effects of bump-shaped vortex generators
Fig. 7 Effects of delta-wing-shaped vortex generators
Fig. 5 Location of vortex generators Fig. 4 Velocity profile on roof
(100 mm upstream from rear end)
14
Nov 6, 2004 | 12:20 PM
#5
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by platinumspecv
And what does this thing do?
Research on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction by Vortex Generators
(15 mm, 20 mm and 25 mm) were all equivalent to
–0.006. The effect of lift reduction increased only slightly
with the height. The drag reduction also differed only
slightly with changes in the number of VGs and their
positions. The number and positions of the tested VGs
seems to be in their optimum ranges.
From these results, delta-wing-shaped VGs were
capable of reducing drag by –0.006.
The reason for why delta-wing-shaped VGs are
more effective than bump-shaped VGs can be explained
as follows: Delta-wing-shaped VGs have a smaller
frontal projection area, which means that they themselves
create smaller drag. Moreover, the vortex generated
at the edge of a delta-wing-shaped VG keeps its
strength in the flow downstream of the edge since it
barely interferes with the VG itself because of the VG’s
platy form. With bump-shaped VGs, on the other hand,
the vortex is generated at a point close to the downstream
edge of the bump, which causes the vortex to
interfere with the bump and lose its strength.
5. Verification of VG’s mechanism
In Section 2 above, the effect of VGs is estimated
that the separation point is shifted to downstream,
which in turn narrows the flow separation region. The
flow field was thus investigated in order to verify the
correctness of this estimation.
Fig. 8
shows total pressure distribution in the wake
flow immediately upstream of the rear spoiler for both
cases with and without VGs. High total pressure
regions correspond to high velocity regions. As the figure
shows, the high velocity region is expanded downward
by addition of VGs, signifying that the flow separation
region is narrowed.
Fig. 9
shows the results of velocity distribution using
the PIV method. The PIV laser light sheet was illuminated
from above on the center plane of the vehicle body
and the measuring surface was photographed from the
side (as indicated by the viewpoint arrow in
Fig. 9) to
calculate the two-dimensional velocity distribution.
Fig.
9 (a)
shows the velocity distribution for the case with
VGs, and
Fig. 9 (b) shows the velocity distribution for
the case without VGs. As evident from the figure, the
case with VGs shows an increase in velocity on the surface
of the body (rear window) just behind the VG (Zone
A in the figure) and extension of the high velocity zone
downward (Zone B in the figure). This supports our
estimation in the previous section that VGs cause airflows
above the rear window to attach to the surfaces
of the body.
This phenomenon was examined in detail using CFD
analysis. Star-CD was used as the solver and RNG k-
å
model as the turbulence model in this analysis. In order
to detect flow separation at the rear window, a prism
cell was inserted in the vicinity of the vehicle, and the
"y+" value of computational grid is arranged to become
an appropriate value between 20 and 50 near the separation
point.
Fig. 10 shows the calculation results for
the case with VGs and the case without VGs. These
results show good agreement with the experimental
results using the PIV method, and clearly show that the
Fig. 8 Total pressure distribution (upstream of rear spoiler)
Fig. 9 Velocity distribution by PIV measurement
15
Research on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction by Vortex Generators
low velocity region is narrowed by the addition of VGs.
The changes in drag and lift calculated by CFD shown
below are almost agree with the experimental results
(
Fig. 7).
.
CD = –0.004
.
CL = –0.013
The CFD calculation, therefore, could simulate the
actual phenomenon. CFD results in
Fig. 10 also show
that the velocity of the airflow along the bottom surface
of the rear spoiler increases by addition of VGs, which
reveals that a decrease in lift (an increase in down-force)
did occur. These results also show that the flow separation
region (low velocity region) at the rear portion of
the trunk is slightly narrowed.
Fig. 11
shows the pressure distribution on the vehicle
body surface. The addition of VGs gives the effect
of increasing the surface pressure over a wide area
ranging from the rear window to the trunk and this in
turn reduces the drag. However, negative pressure
region around the VGs indicate that VGs themselves
cause drag.
Such changes in airflow can be attributed to VGs
that work to suppress flow separation at the rear window.
To verify this mechanism, the airflow was studied
in further detail.
Fig. 12 shows vorticity distribution
behind the VGs. Streamwise vortices are generated
behind the VGs.
Our estimation that the streamwise vortex causes
the separation point to shift downstream is confirmed
by CFD results.
Fig. 13 shows close-up views of the flow
field near the separation point. The case with VGs
shows flow separation occuring further downstream
than in the case without VGs.
6. Conclusions
The conclusions of this research can be summarized
into the following points:
Fig. 11 Pressure distribution of vehicle (CFD)
Fig. 12 Vorticity distribution behind
vortex generators (CFD)
Fig. 10 Velocity distribution by CFD
16
Research on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction by Vortex Generators
(1) Vortex generators (VGs) were studied to install
immediately upstream of the flow separation point
in order to control separation of airflow above the
sedan’s rear window and improve the aerodynamic
characteristics. It was found that the optimum
height of the VGs is almost equivalent to the thickness
of the boundary layer (15 to 25 mm) and the
optimum method of placement is to arrange them
in a row in the lateral direction 100 mm upstream of
the roof end at intervals of 100 mm. The VGs are not
highly sensitive to these parameters and their optimum
value ranges are wide. Better effects are
obtained from delta-wing-shaped VGs than from
bump-shaped VGs.
(2) Application of the VGs of the optimum shape determined
through the abovementioned analyses to the
Mitsubishi LANCER EVOLUTION showed a 0.006
reduction in both the drag coefficient and lift coefficient.
(3) Factors contributing to the effect of VGs were verified
by conducting measurement of total pressure,
velocity distribution and CFD. As a result of the verifications,
it is confirmed that VGs create streamwise
vortices, the vortices mix higher and lower layers of
boundary layer and the mixture causes the flow separation
point to shift downstream, consequently
separation region is narrowed. From this, we could
predict that VGs cause the pressure of the vehicle’s
entire rear surface to increase therefore decreasing
drag, also the velocity around the rear spoiler to
increase, and the lift to decrease.
The delta-wing-shaped VG, which demonstrated
high effectiveness in this research, is planned for commercialization
as an accessory for sedans after slight
modifications to the shape with respect to design, legal
conformance and practicality.
Trending Topics
Nov 6, 2004 | 02:23 PM
#9
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by EVO KING295
are u painting it to match ur car? i liked these at first, but my opinion changed shortly after they came out 
Nov 6, 2004 | 09:53 PM
#15
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by Mikebuzzsaw
how much?
http://www.lancershop.com/customer/p...&cat=49&page=1