Notices
Evo Show / Shine Post your pictures, photoshops, and videos!

ugliest EVO ever thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2007, 08:49 AM
  #196  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
evofan@scorp's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victorville, CA
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVOVIII200






WTF is ugly/rice about an Evo getting race prepped? IMHO it's beautiful
Old Feb 28, 2007, 08:58 AM
  #197  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ryan0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how are some of those cars any less ricey than these?.. 8 zillion stickers, bad paint jobs and transformer parts.. right?


darth vaders retarded cousin



painters stand on that to work on buildings



its voltrons left foot.



looks like it has side burns.



looks like a place mat from a chinese restaraunt



rolin on pumpkins.. (hehe.. sorry.. had to)

rice is a pretty selectively subjective thing.

for example.. if i put a big sticker that says "caution excessive boost" on my car.. its it ricey?
Old Feb 28, 2007, 09:07 AM
  #198  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
speedomodel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Big Zero, NE
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey, this thread is about ugly Evo's, not rice.
Old Feb 28, 2007, 09:19 AM
  #199  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ryan0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by speedomodel
Hey, this thread is about ugly Evo's, not rice.
you wan to tell me the wing on the ams evo isnt ugly?
Old Feb 28, 2007, 09:36 AM
  #200  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (56)
 
nils's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: vegas baby....
Posts: 3,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh come on... you know rollin on pumkins is hott with 2 t's ....

and we always called the AMS wing a big cheese slicer.. but I like the painters stand comparo.. ha ha
Old Feb 28, 2007, 09:38 AM
  #201  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
thedarkside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort Collins aka FOCO
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you must be retarded to think that those time attack cars are ugly or ricey. They are functional additions that make them faster. Not needless ricer parts. And saying the GSC time attack car is ricey is a bold ignorant move.
Old Feb 28, 2007, 09:41 AM
  #202  
Account Disabled
 
Vigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ugly is ugly, no matter how functional it is. As for me I would get the most functional/ugly car, because it will be the fastest.
Old Feb 28, 2007, 09:45 AM
  #203  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ryan0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thedarkside
you must be retarded to think that those time attack cars are ugly or ricey. They are functional additions that make them faster. Not needless ricer parts. And saying the GSC time attack car is ricey is a bold ignorant move.
yes.. im retarded..

how functional are those stickers, chrome parts and custom paint jobs?.. dont most carbon fiber evo hoods weight more than stock?

and ive seen alot of things that are function and ugly at the same time..




but im a retard so what do i know.

and its not GSCs time attack car.. it actually belongs to a person.

Last edited by ryan0; Feb 28, 2007 at 11:18 AM.
Old Feb 28, 2007, 09:47 AM
  #204  
Newbie
 
GeneralODLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Spanaway/JBLM, WA
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thedarkside
you must be retarded to think that those time attack cars are ugly or ricey. They are functional additions that make them faster. Not needless ricer parts. And saying the GSC time attack car is ricey is a bold ignorant move.
I totally agree. Ugly might be ugly, but ugly is not necessarily ricey. There is a line between the two. And those time attack cars are beautiful IMHO. I would agree it would be wierd to drive them everyday, but they are track cars afterall.
Old Feb 28, 2007, 09:48 AM
  #205  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ryan0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nils
oh come on... you know rollin on pumkins is hott with 2 t's ....

i wish i could afford pumpkins with re-10s..
Old Feb 28, 2007, 09:58 AM
  #206  
Evolving Member
 
lowbdgtmechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area CA.
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MTRJunior
Anyone else think the front of this car looks like the front of an evo X??

where did you dig this one up? yuk!
Old Feb 28, 2007, 10:44 AM
  #207  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
thedarkside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort Collins aka FOCO
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ryan0
yes.. im retarded..

how functional are those stickers, chrome parts and custom paint jobs?.. dont most carbon fiber evo hoods weight more than stock?

and ive seen alot of things that are function and ugly at the same time..


but im a retard so what do i know.

and its not GSCs time attack car.. it actually belongs to a person.

Yes I know. Nils car is very nice and I didnt intend to say it was owned by GSC. As far as chrome you need to stop smoking crack. There is no chrome anywhere on those cars. They are purposely built for the track and that alone makes them amazing. Also, you calling the superbird and ugly car is just bad taste.
Old Feb 28, 2007, 10:57 AM
  #208  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
derangedazn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually I think the Superbird is ugly as crap. Would I take one...hells yes. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It is one thing saying something is ugly....but bashing the owner is another thing. Everyone has a reason, whether it be money, looks, or just to be original...it is their right.
Old Feb 28, 2007, 11:02 AM
  #209  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ryan0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thedarkside
As far as chrome you need to stop smoking crack. There is no chrome anywhere on those cars. They are purposely built for the track and that alone makes them amazing. Also, you calling the superbird and ugly car is just bad taste.

oh sorry.. "highly polished, buffed out aluminum.".. oh.. and a pop up windshield.. missed that.. thats like 50hp




and the super bird was ugly... functional piece of history.. but ugly.. so stay away from my crack.


Last edited by ryan0; Feb 28, 2007 at 11:19 AM.
Old Feb 28, 2007, 11:21 AM
  #210  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
hokiruu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Truckee, CA
Posts: 2,004
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
RyanO, you are funny. I love every single car you posted and would love to own any of them. And while you may not like the graphics or polished parts on the Weld S14, that thing is an amazing example of functional metal fabrication.


Quick Reply: ugliest EVO ever thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:20 AM.