Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.
View Poll Results: Which tires for your weekend auto-x/mountain run/daily driving car?
Falken Azenis RT-615
65.15%
Kumho Ecsta MX (non-run flat)
27.27%
Nitto Extreme 555 ZR
7.58%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Falken AZenis RT-615 vs. Kumho Ecsta MX vs. Nitto 555 extreme

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2005, 10:36 PM
  #16  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
plokivos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,902
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
where did you get yours? any good deals?
Old Jul 20, 2005, 10:44 AM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
bullfrg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by evodave
btw DON'T get 245 45 17s ....GET the 255 40 17s....please trust me.
Why not Dave?? I run STU class for autox and we are limited to 245 width with awd and these were the tires I was thinking about.
Old Jul 21, 2005, 03:49 AM
  #18  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
plokivos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,902
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
i run SM class. wider must be better. although Tom at nasioc is singing a different tune.
Old Jul 21, 2005, 12:06 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
4-BNGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nitto 555 Extreme ZR's is what I use
Old Jul 21, 2005, 12:10 PM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Rez90's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Flemington, NJ
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all i can say is the nitto's SUCK!!!
Old Jul 28, 2005, 04:41 PM
  #21  
AcA
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
AcA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Rez90
all i can say is the nitto's SUCK!!!
i 2nd that we have track car not a drag car
Old Jul 28, 2005, 07:22 PM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
TURBODAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only downside to the Falken RT-615 is the full tread depth is only 8/32". Most other tires that you are comparing them to are 10/32" tread depth. The deeper tread causes the tires to squirm more until they have worn down some. It would be interesting to see some of the other UHP tires from other companies compete with Falkens at an equal tread depth. This could be why the steering response is soo good on the RT-615's.

This is something to consider if you are looking to have these tires a long time. A tire is technically bald at 2/32" tread depth, so with the RT-615 you only have 6/32 of an inch to wear until the tire is toast.

Please dont take me wrong, I wanted the RT-615, but the fact that the tread is so shallow to begin with shyed me away. I dont want to get new tires that quckly. If you dont care about tire life, the RT615 seems like an awesome tire and a good/equal replacement for the Advans at a reduced cost.

I am gonna try the T1-R in a 255/40/17 on my 17 x 9 FNO1RCs. Cant wait to get them heat cylcled and scrubbed in a little, to see how they handle. I hope I am not too disappointed in the Dry handling and steering response.

Brian
Old Jul 29, 2005, 07:24 AM
  #23  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (21)
 
nhsean69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My buddy is running 245/45/17 Falkens and on a S-Techs and he gets rubbing when gets rubbing when he cuts the wheel full
Old Jul 29, 2005, 07:31 AM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
TURBODAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That size tire is too tall for some lowered cars. I know someone else who had rubbing issues with H techs and BFG KD's in the 245/45/17. The best size to go with is a 255/40/17 if you are lowered. That tire maybe slightly too wide for the stock wheel though.

Brian
Old Aug 15, 2005, 10:06 AM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
machron1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fixem2
ANy problems with the 255/40/17 on the stock rim?
After two hard track days and 5K street miles with 255/40/17 on stock wheels they still have over half the tread left and feel just as good as when they were new. So, to answer your question, NO
Old Aug 15, 2005, 10:09 AM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
machron1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TURBODAWG
Only downside to the Falken RT-615 is the full tread depth is only 8/32". Most other tires that you are comparing them to are 10/32" tread depth. The deeper tread causes the tires to squirm more until they have worn down some. It would be interesting to see some of the other UHP tires from other companies compete with Falkens at an equal tread depth. This could be why the steering response is soo good on the RT-615's.

This is something to consider if you are looking to have these tires a long time. A tire is technically bald at 2/32" tread depth, so with the RT-615 you only have 6/32 of an inch to wear until the tire is toast.

Please dont take me wrong, I wanted the RT-615, but the fact that the tread is so shallow to begin with shyed me away. I dont want to get new tires that quckly. If you dont care about tire life, the RT615 seems like an awesome tire and a good/equal replacement for the Advans at a reduced cost.

I am gonna try the T1-R in a 255/40/17 on my 17 x 9 FNO1RCs. Cant wait to get them heat cylcled and scrubbed in a little, to see how they handle. I hope I am not too disappointed in the Dry handling and steering response.

Brian
Don't fret I swear these things wear like a 300 treadwear tire. The lack of tread depth helps it manage heat better giving you better life. I have two track days and 5K+ street miles on mine and they still have plenty of tread, not close to the wear bars.
Old Aug 16, 2005, 09:51 AM
  #27  
Evolved Member
 
ratt_finkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jid2
Go Falken, I've seen Kuhmo's delaminate at the track, and people on Falkens were fine. The Kuhmo's don't handle heat as well as the new Azenis's
I don't know where you are getting your info. But it is grossely incorrect. The Kumho's love heat. The old and new Azenis' suffer from getting greasy with too much heat. The new model is not quite as affected by the heat. The MX's are not great in the rain. And I would never by anything Nitto.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sevy2213
Motor Sports
41
Mar 30, 2011 05:15 AM
MisterMR
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
48
Mar 3, 2007 03:20 AM
sillypuddy
04-06 Ralliart Tires/Wheels/Brakes/Suspension
28
Apr 22, 2005 10:11 AM
Noize
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
4
Jul 2, 2004 07:43 AM
cjb
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
6
Jan 20, 2004 10:53 PM



Quick Reply: Falken AZenis RT-615 vs. Kumho Ecsta MX vs. Nitto 555 extreme



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:45 PM.