EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.

(Max) tire size Advan RGII 18*9 +29 on Evo IX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2009, 08:03 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Pade_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
(Max) tire size Advan RGII 18*9 +29 on Evo IX
Hi all,

I recently bought a Evo IX and it came with 18*9 +29 Advan RG II -wheels and 235/40-18 tires. The tires are worn out so I have to get new ones.
I would like to go a bit wider than 235 if thats possible without rubbing and my question is will 255/35-18 work without rubbing? Rolling/spacers needed?
Or am I better off sticking to 235/40-18 or maybe 245/something?

The car is currently sitting on Tein S-Techs but I will get the MonoFlex coilovers very soon.

Thankfull for any input/experience!

Regards,
Patrik
Pade_ is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 30, 2009, 04:57 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
PANGES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends what tires you're getting, because some tires run wider than others. I had a set of 245/40/18 Azenis RT-615 on the same wheels and they didn't rub. I now have 255/35/18 Dunlop Direzza DZ101 and they dont rub either, but the DZ101 look to be skinnier than the RT-615.

Current alignment specs on my car: -2* camber front, -1.5* camber rear. 0 toe all around.
PANGES is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 30, 2009, 06:12 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: On the track
Posts: 4,358
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
You should be able to run the 255s without issue. I've run many different 255s on mine. While on stock struts... you will be limited on max negative camber up front but once you switch to coilovers you'll be fine.
Jeff_Jeske is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 31, 2009, 12:01 AM
  #4  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Pade_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So 255/35-18 should be a safe bet then? And there should not be any issues with rubbing?
I've been looking at some Falken FK452's, not sure if that's something you have in the US?

If anyone else has some insights, please feel free to comment

Thanks!
Pade_ is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 31, 2009, 12:44 AM
  #5  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
vegasevo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like 245/40 since they are taller. Better for daily driving.
Last edited by vegasevo9; Apr 2, 2009 at 12:41 AM.
vegasevo9 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 31, 2009, 06:30 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: On the track
Posts: 4,358
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
The 18" tires are gonna be a tiny bit shorter than the stock 17" tire. Even with that offset you won't have any problems.
Jeff_Jeske is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 31, 2009, 07:20 AM
  #7  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
itzcharlez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: new york
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
255/35 is the best fit..
itzcharlez is offline  
Reply Like

Trending Topics

Old Mar 31, 2009, 11:00 AM
  #8  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Pade_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske
The 18" tires are gonna be a tiny bit shorter than the stock 17" tire. Even with that offset you won't have any problems.
You mean 255/35-18 here or?
Pade_ is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 31, 2009, 09:24 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: On the track
Posts: 4,358
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Yea.... if I remember correctly... a 255-35-18 is shorter than a 235-45-17.
Jeff_Jeske is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 31, 2009, 10:02 PM
  #10  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
itzcharlez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: new york
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
255-35/18 is closest to stock diameter
itzcharlez is offline  
Reply Like
Old Mar 31, 2009, 10:51 PM
  #11  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Pade_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by itzcharlez
255-35/18 is closest to stock diameter
And the width is not a problem with 9" wide wheel and that offset?

I'm just used to my previous car where 225 was the absolute maximum I could use and 255 just seems SO wide
Pade_ is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 1, 2009, 10:28 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Inprogress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too was considering 255/35/18's, but opted for 245/40/18 as they will be a tad comfier for daily driving and should be cheaper too.
Inprogress is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 1, 2009, 10:35 PM
  #13  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
itzcharlez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: new york
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Inprogress
I too was considering 255/35/18's, but opted for 245/40/18 as they will be a tad comfier for daily driving and should be cheaper too.

this is true they are alot cheaper in price. they do require a bit more fender work to fit though compared to the 255/35 considering it's a bit taller.
itzcharlez is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 1, 2009, 10:36 PM
  #14  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
itzcharlez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: new york
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pade_
And the width is not a problem with 9" wide wheel and that offset?

I'm just used to my previous car where 225 was the absolute maximum I could use and 255 just seems SO wide
nope you can even fit 265 on a 18x9
itzcharlez is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 1, 2009, 11:06 PM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Inprogress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by itzcharlez
this is true they are alot cheaper in price. they do require a bit more fender work to fit though compared to the 255/35 considering it's a bit taller.
Agreed on the fender work, I just switched to a 18x9.5+22 and am eating it now lol, but with a 18x9+29 I imagine it shouldn't be too difficult.
Inprogress is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: (Max) tire size Advan RGII 18*9 +29 on Evo IX


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:14 AM.