Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.
View Poll Results: Which one??
OZ Ultraleggera
15
31.91%
Enkie Nt03+m
32
68.09%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Enkei Nt03+m or OZ Ultraleggera?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 2, 2010 | 06:00 PM
  #1  
lilmarf's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood, Florida
Enkei Nt03+m or OZ Ultraleggera?????

I have a GG evo 9 and I'm not sure which rim to go with. The ultraleggeras are 18x9 +35 and fit perfectly with no mods. The nt03+m are 18x9.5 +27 need a 10mm-12mm spacer up front. I love both rims and they are both around the same price. Let me which one you guys prefer!!
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 05:45 AM
  #2  
FJF's Avatar
FJF
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 6
From: NYS
I vote for the wheels that fit.
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 06:07 AM
  #3  
EvoLutionized8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
kind of a no brainer imo. NT03+M
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 06:13 AM
  #4  
Crazy Eyes's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Manila, Philippines
^^ Yup. Go with the Enkeis in black.
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 06:52 AM
  #5  
Toxin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 2
From: Way ahead...
I'd go with OZ. They're lighter than the Enkei and far far less people use them on Evos
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 07:21 AM
  #6  
fasterbater's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Montreal - Quebec
Go with the strongest rim you can afford, that can fit the widest tire you can afford. Lightweight is overrated. Your wheels can slightly deform at high speeds, and this is especially true with sticky tires such as Ecsta MX or RE01-Rs and RT-615's. The stronger wheel always gets my vote and nothing seems stronger (for a cast wheel) than the NT03+M.
It's a good wheel. The rotational unsprung weight savings can be made with 2-peice floating rotors instead.
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 08:32 AM
  #7  
FJF's Avatar
FJF
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 6
From: NYS
Originally Posted by fasterbater
Lightweight is overrated. [...] The rotational unsprung weight savings can be made with 2-peice floating rotors instead.
This can only end well.
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 08:36 AM
  #8  
Smike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,002
Likes: 11
From: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Originally Posted by fasterbater
Lightweight is overrated. [...] The rotational unsprung weight savings can be made with 2-peice floating rotors instead.
/facepalm.
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 08:40 AM
  #9  
emagdnim8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 1
From: Earth
Originally Posted by fasterbater
Go with the strongest rim you can afford, that can fit the widest tire you can afford. Lightweight is overrated. Your wheels can slightly deform at high speeds, and this is especially true with sticky tires such as Ecsta MX or RE01-Rs and RT-615's. The stronger wheel always gets my vote and nothing seems stronger (for a cast wheel) than the NT03+M.
It's a good wheel. The rotational unsprung weight savings can be made with 2-peice floating rotors instead.
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 05:21 PM
  #10  
Neal@tirerack's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 5
From: Indiana
O.Z lighter, a bit stronger, and no spacers needed. Call me if you want to pick up a set.
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 05:26 PM
  #11  
Toxin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 2
From: Way ahead...
Originally Posted by SmikeEvo
/facepalm.
Epic.
Old Jun 3, 2010 | 05:45 PM
  #12  
4G63kevin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
From: Fresno
Both are nice, but I prefer the better fitting one. (:
Old Jun 4, 2010 | 10:33 AM
  #13  
fasterbater's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Montreal - Quebec
The counter-face-palming begins.

Here's why. A wheel that sacrifices strength for light weight is effectively more compressible, has less torsional rigidity and is more prone to micro-fissures than a wheel of comparable size and higher weight (using the same construction method of course). The performance benefits end up becoming a trade off. This is not the case with 2-peice floating rotors and the weight savings are pretty much the same as going from a 20lb wheel to a 17lb wheel, but without the sacrifice of strength. Your braking may even improve more with those rotors than with the lighter wheel.

The posted comment wasn't aimed at the cheapo's buying Rota's and jobber cross-drilled rotors. It's aimed at people that like the words "Science" and "Technology" and who are willing to pay to play. This isn't a Ford Focus forum afterall. On the other hand, if your Brembo lettering is still nice and white, don't read this post, and buy whatever you think gives the most "hella flush" look or whatever it is that kids are doing these days in dimly lit parking lots.

As for comparing both wheels, I love the NT03+M for everything it is. If you do require spacers to fit it properly and clear the brembo's, i'd go with the OZ, as that is again another compromise of suspension geometry and is more prone to deflection than a hub-centric direct fit.

Science never deserves a flaming.
Old Jun 4, 2010 | 10:58 AM
  #14  
Smike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 9,002
Likes: 11
From: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Originally Posted by fasterbater
This isn't a Ford Focus forum afterall.
Its not like I never have raced my Evo or wrote the sticky on brakes Why do you think I stick around here? There are a lot of great members here - Focus Forums = not so much Back on topic.

Originally Posted by fasterbater
The counter-face-palming begins.

Here's why. A wheel that sacrifices strength for light weight is effectively more compressible, has less torsional rigidity and is more prone to micro-fissures than a wheel of comparable size and higher weight (using the same construction method of course). The performance benefits end up becoming a trade off. This is not the case with 2-peice floating rotors and the weight savings are pretty much the same as going from a 20lb wheel to a 17lb wheel, but without the sacrifice of strength. Your braking may even improve more with those rotors than with the lighter wheel.

The posted comment wasn't aimed at the cheapo's buying Rota's and jobber cross-drilled rotors. It's aimed at people that like the words "Science" and "Technology" and who are willing to pay to play. This isn't a Ford Focus forum afterall. On the other hand, if your Brembo lettering is still nice and white, don't read this post, and buy whatever you think gives the most "hella flush" look or whatever it is that kids are doing these days in dimly lit parking lots.

As for comparing both wheels, I love the NT03+M for everything it is. If you do require spacers to fit it properly and clear the brembo's, i'd go with the OZ, as that is again another compromise of suspension geometry and is more prone to deflection than a hub-centric direct fit.

Science never deserves a flaming.
I <3 science.

Just because its light, does not mean its compressible or prone to failure. The key is construction - which you hit upon.

You are looking roughly a $800 brake rotor upgrade vs. a roughly a $1400 tire + ~$800 plus in tires = $2200+. Mathematically, its a no brainer. And I would not use 18x8+ on the street, no need to.

What I would do - 17x8 Enkei RPF1 (15.5 lbs each), keep my tire size. And if you really wanted to spend $2000 - get the 2pc rotors too.
Old Jun 4, 2010 | 11:57 AM
  #15  
fasterbater's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Montreal - Quebec
Ok, so it looks like we're on the same page then, sorry i thought i was getting flamed, im used to my local forum where everybody wants to know "who makes the best exhaust" and "where can I get (insert original design part here) for 1/4 of the price".

Lol thanks for getting me on the paraphrasing, it does read a little off the first time around :P

/selfpalm...

...
...
... dont get the wrong idea with the self-palming...


Quick Reply: Enkei Nt03+m or OZ Ultraleggera?????



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:02 PM.