rpf1 help!!!
Aug 26, 2010, 09:45 AM
#22
Ive been searching RPF1's for quite some time. My much respected suspension tuner here in So.Cal (Mueller) noted that fitting a 17 x 9.5 is very tough & will likely rub the rear suspension arms.
Heres a shot of a wheel & tire package that has gone through some clearance tests to ensure a proper fit
If you cant get the 17 x 9.5 +38 to float into the rear well like this, then its too freaking wide.
Why not go w/ the 17 x 9 +35? Peace
Heres a shot of a wheel & tire package that has gone through some clearance tests to ensure a proper fit
If you cant get the 17 x 9.5 +38 to float into the rear well like this, then its too freaking wide.
Why not go w/ the 17 x 9 +35? Peace
Aug 27, 2010, 12:09 AM
#25
[QUOTE=MinusPrevious;8617372]Ive been searching RPF1's for quite some time. My much respected suspension tuner here in So.Cal (Mueller) noted that fitting a 17 x 9.5 is very tough & will likely rub the rear suspension arms.
Heres a shot of a wheel & tire package that has gone through some clearance tests to ensure a proper fit
If you cant get the 17 x 9.5 +38 to float into the rear well like this, then its too freaking wide.
Why not go w/ the 17 x 9 +35? Peace
i know the 17x10+38 rub on the lower controll arm but the 17x9.5 idk and im actually muellerized myself
.. i havent found a good set in 17x9.
btw my brother is actually running 18x9.5+35 on 265s with NO fender work.
Heres a shot of a wheel & tire package that has gone through some clearance tests to ensure a proper fit
If you cant get the 17 x 9.5 +38 to float into the rear well like this, then its too freaking wide.
Why not go w/ the 17 x 9 +35? Peace
i know the 17x10+38 rub on the lower controll arm but the 17x9.5 idk and im actually muellerized myself
.. i havent found a good set in 17x9.btw my brother is actually running 18x9.5+35 on 265s with NO fender work.
