Aluminum vs steel lug nuts
#16
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Good Job Dave Man
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IDK how light they are, nor do I care, honestly. I've shaved weight off all other places, that a few extra ounces in lugnuts won't eff me up too bad.
Try taking a dump before your next track event and maybe limit your water intake by a pint or so.... will lead to the same results of running the 90 million dollar titanium nuts..... and is a FREE mod.
Chromoly should theoretically be lighter than steel, heavier than alum and titanium, but when you're working with a material that takes up a few cc's of space, it really, truly does not matter one bit. No one on here is a good enough driver that 1-2 extra ounces will kill them in an event.... no one.
Try taking a dump before your next track event and maybe limit your water intake by a pint or so.... will lead to the same results of running the 90 million dollar titanium nuts..... and is a FREE mod.
Chromoly should theoretically be lighter than steel, heavier than alum and titanium, but when you're working with a material that takes up a few cc's of space, it really, truly does not matter one bit. No one on here is a good enough driver that 1-2 extra ounces will kill them in an event.... no one.
#17
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
I went with the Blox Chromoly ones because of the strength of the material. I would have used a steel set had any fit my wheels and been open ended. To ME, lugnuts being lightweight is secondary to strength, and reliability . I want them to withstand the heat and abuse of track duty and of being removed and torqued back on as often as I need to. I dont want the threads giving out on me just to shave a few grams-- not worth it. I would splurge on the titanium lugnuts if I knew they would outlast steel ones. And its nice to be able to zap them off with a gun without worry.
#18
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree that aluminum is a good choice, but 7075-T6 is a poor choice for a lugnut for racing applications. Not due to it's strength or weight, but because the heat treatment will be damaged when the material gets above 250F - which happens on front wheel lugs quite easily during track days. Note that Porsche has used aluminum lugs on all their 911/930 series cars for 30+ years.
Should? You mean if it's made smaller? 4130 and 4340 only have a few percent of alloying elements in them so there is no difference between 4130/4340 and mild steel as far as weight (less than 1% - don't forget that chrome and molybdenum also weight about the same as iron). Now if we're talking thin-wall tubing compared to thick-wall, then yes - but the metal volume is different. But not for a lugnut that has the same dimensions.
Aluminum is more than strong enough for track duty for holding your wheels on (see note above about Porsche race cars using alum lugnuts for 30+ years). You're talking like you need 8340 screws to mount the door panels - something that won't break when you slam the door!!
Chromoly should theoretically be lighter than steel, heavier than alum and titanium, but when you're working with a material that takes up a few cc's of space,
To ME, lugnuts being lightweight is secondary to strength, and reliability . I want them to withstand the heat and abuse of track duty and of being removed and torqued back on as often as I need to.
Last edited by Q15H; Jul 26, 2011 at 03:11 PM.
#19
The problem with aluminum lug nuts isnt its strength, it's its fatigue life for a car that may be taking lugs on and off hundreds of times. The biggest issue Ive seen is from galling on both steel and aluminum lugs when trying to remove them still hot.
Ive personally had the best luck with crome plated lugs, the surface seems to be the hardest and most slippery for preventing the threads fusing.
Ive personally had the best luck with crome plated lugs, the surface seems to be the hardest and most slippery for preventing the threads fusing.
#21
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake Jackson, Tx
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had the Blox aluminum open ended lug nuts, and they pretty much melted themselves to my extended wheel studs. I had to use a thread chaser and a couple hours to fix the studs.. They were on the car when I bought them so I can't say whether they were tightened by hand or with an impact. Either way, I purchased the Muteki lugnuts and they looked nearly identical. They are only slightly heavier.
Last edited by Steven; Aug 1, 2011 at 02:12 PM.
#24
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For a race car that gets checked quite often and using aluminum lug nuts Id give it a shot.
On the stud/nut lube - be user o use something that has a very high drip point and isn't likely to catch fire. And use it sparingly.
The main point I wanted to get across is how close the open steel lug nuts weigh to the alum. and titanium. .04 lb will not do much even if its rotational weight.
Remember that weight savings is always a combination of small weight gains (or losses). A jalf- pound here and there several hundred times makes a big difference. It's VERY difficult to loose 200 Lbs in one step.
Some day we may have carbon fiber lug nuts but probably not in my lifetime.
#25
Account Disabled
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Clinton, NJ - Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Last November I picked up a set of Fortune Auto Ti Lug Nuts during their Black Friday sale. A set of stock lug nuts weight around 2.5 lbs and a set of their Ti Lug Nuts is around 1 lb. So it dropped around 1.5 lbs. I didn't get them to drop 1.5 lbs but got them because I want to swap in some extended studs later this year. If I didn't pick these up during their Black Friday sale I would still be rocking the stock lug nuts...
#27
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (98)
Anyone that's considering swapping lug nuts as a way to increase performance needs to look at the bigger picture. There's no way that dropping 1.5 lbs from a 3000 lb car is going to net any noticeable gains. 1.5 lbs may be noticeable to a cyclist, but not a car
Buy the strongest lug nuts that you think look cool.
Buy the strongest lug nuts that you think look cool.
#28
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^
I seriously doubt that anyone here thinks they're gonna see any performance difference just from one small weight reduction. However 100 small weight reductions will indeed yield significant results.
And getting an EVO down to 3000 would be a massive performance improvement, especially for an X.
I seriously doubt that anyone here thinks they're gonna see any performance difference just from one small weight reduction. However 100 small weight reductions will indeed yield significant results.
And getting an EVO down to 3000 would be a massive performance improvement, especially for an X.
#29
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
Note that Porsche has used aluminum lugs on all their 911/930 series cars for 30+ years.
Aluminum is more than strong enough for track duty for holding your wheels on (see note above about Porsche race cars using alum lugnuts for 30+ years). You're talking like you need 8340 screws to mount the door panels - something that won't break when you slam the door!!
Aluminum is more than strong enough for track duty for holding your wheels on (see note above about Porsche race cars using alum lugnuts for 30+ years). You're talking like you need 8340 screws to mount the door panels - something that won't break when you slam the door!!
But anyhow, not trying to start an argument here. Honestly I can only speak from experience and having tried a few alum/duralum/ and others in the past, they have all been worthless. I Always removed and torqued by hand but never had good luck with them. The worst ones I have tried ever were the kyukugen (sp?). the lugnuts themselvers werent the issue, but rather the key that was needed always stripped no matter what. I would say at least use lugnuts that dont require a special key. That is my advise to anyone thinking about ANY aftermarket lugnuts. my .02
#30
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Monroe, wa
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What some are forgetting is the relation to rotational weight vs static weight. Somewhere on here there was a thread about the ratio - 1 lb of rotational weight is the same as ? lbs of static weight (think it was around 9 lbs). I forget the actual ratio, but its significant - well, for us racer types.
Any rotational weight loss will improve acceleration period.
Now somebody may spend $500 on a seat (or ?) that's 10lbs lighter, but could have just spent 200 on a set of lugs instead.
Agreed with Tommi - never get lugs with keys - you'll loose the key just when you need it. It's easier to borrow a missing 19mm socket from the neighboring pits than to find a key.
Any rotational weight loss will improve acceleration period.
Now somebody may spend $500 on a seat (or ?) that's 10lbs lighter, but could have just spent 200 on a set of lugs instead.
Agreed with Tommi - never get lugs with keys - you'll loose the key just when you need it. It's easier to borrow a missing 19mm socket from the neighboring pits than to find a key.