Used Autronic PNP Evo 8 ecu board
Dec 12, 2003, 11:06 PM
#16
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TRDHarrier
haha...Al's Dynoflash vs Autronic.
haha...Al's Dynoflash vs Autronic.
Dec 13, 2003, 02:04 PM
#17
Originally posted by DynoFlash
Dynoflash makes same power - even through the stock maf sensor - more consistantly and more accurately - with less problems and less effort
Dynoflash makes same power - even through the stock maf sensor - more consistantly and more accurately - with less problems and less effort
Dec 13, 2003, 02:20 PM
#18
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by gldenchld
WoW?? Al I am always open minded but that statement. I agree your dynoflash is great on a stock car, but after working with the autronic and the aem unit you cant compare as long as it is tuned right. The head tuner at AEM made 66 whp on a bone stock evo.
WoW?? Al I am always open minded but that statement. I agree your dynoflash is great on a stock car, but after working with the autronic and the aem unit you cant compare as long as it is tuned right. The head tuner at AEM made 66 whp on a bone stock evo.
I just don;t care for the autronic at all
How about you - you keeping it or going aem also?
