EcuFlash 2.0 Beta testing dyno results
#1
EcuFlash 2.0 Beta testing dyno results
Some testing of the new EcuFlash, Mustang Dyno, no correction:
2008 Evo 10
Mods:
100% factory stock power wise
18x10.5 wheels with 275/35/18 tires
California 91 octane
EcuFlash
+62whp / +31wtq peak gains with custom reflash
Factory boost control system, no upgraded pills, nothing. 23psi peak boost.
Huge gains in area under the curve, huge gains in spool, response and top end.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 Evo 10
Mods:
WORKS drop-in filter
California 91 octane
EcuFlash
+32whp / +13wtq peak gains with custom reflash
This 10 gained less than the above 10 as it came in with a drop-in filter already so the baseline was much higher than the 100% stock 10 above.
Note however that the power after custom tuning is approx the same between the two.
Factory boost control system, no upgraded pills, nothing. 23psi peak boost.
Again, large gains in area under the curve, huge gains in spool, response and top end.
2008 Evo 10
Mods:
100% factory stock power wise
18x10.5 wheels with 275/35/18 tires
California 91 octane
EcuFlash
+62whp / +31wtq peak gains with custom reflash
Factory boost control system, no upgraded pills, nothing. 23psi peak boost.
Huge gains in area under the curve, huge gains in spool, response and top end.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 Evo 10
Mods:
WORKS drop-in filter
California 91 octane
EcuFlash
+32whp / +13wtq peak gains with custom reflash
This 10 gained less than the above 10 as it came in with a drop-in filter already so the baseline was much higher than the 100% stock 10 above.
Note however that the power after custom tuning is approx the same between the two.
Factory boost control system, no upgraded pills, nothing. 23psi peak boost.
Again, large gains in area under the curve, huge gains in spool, response and top end.
#7
another one today:
2008 Evo 10
Mods:
UR intake (larger MAF housing + Open cone filter)
UR downpipe, HighFlow Cat, single exit catback
This 10 baselined super high because of the TBE and intake that really leaned the car out, it's almost as if the AFR curve had been tuned already.
Baseline with factory tune = 272whp / 278wtq
Power after EcuFlash tune = 298whp / 301wtq
+26whp / +23wtq peak gains with EcuFlash tune.
Factory boost control system with no upgraded pills, 24.5psi peak boost.
2008 Evo 10
Mods:
UR intake (larger MAF housing + Open cone filter)
UR downpipe, HighFlow Cat, single exit catback
This 10 baselined super high because of the TBE and intake that really leaned the car out, it's almost as if the AFR curve had been tuned already.
Baseline with factory tune = 272whp / 278wtq
Power after EcuFlash tune = 298whp / 301wtq
+26whp / +23wtq peak gains with EcuFlash tune.
Factory boost control system with no upgraded pills, 24.5psi peak boost.
Trending Topics
#9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kanagawa, Japan
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
another one today:
2008 Evo 10
Mods:
UR intake (larger MAF housing + Open cone filter)
UR downpipe, HighFlow Cat, single exit catback
This 10 baselined super high because of the TBE and intake that really leaned the car out, it's almost as if the AFR curve had been tuned already.
Baseline with factory tune = 272whp / 278wtq
Power after EcuFlash tune = 298whp / 301wtq
+26whp / +23wtq peak gains with EcuFlash tune.
Factory boost control system with no upgraded pills, 24.5psi peak boost.
2008 Evo 10
Mods:
UR intake (larger MAF housing + Open cone filter)
UR downpipe, HighFlow Cat, single exit catback
This 10 baselined super high because of the TBE and intake that really leaned the car out, it's almost as if the AFR curve had been tuned already.
Baseline with factory tune = 272whp / 278wtq
Power after EcuFlash tune = 298whp / 301wtq
+26whp / +23wtq peak gains with EcuFlash tune.
Factory boost control system with no upgraded pills, 24.5psi peak boost.
Were you hitting pretty low loads with that intake? Did you adjust the actual maps or did you some how rescale your MAF to adjust for the larger MAF housing? I adjust the actual maps and it's a pain in the butt.
#13
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bryan just tuned my X today and i show the same area under the curve gains as all the others. It may not seem like much when looking at the other dynos with peak 23 whp, etc. But because the power is everywhere it makes the X so much more usable and it feels so much faster than it ever has before. Thanks Bryan!
#15
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
Bryan just tuned my X today and i show the same area under the curve gains as all the others. It may not seem like much when looking at the other dynos with peak 23 whp, etc. But because the power is everywhere it makes the X so much more usable and it feels so much faster than it ever has before. Thanks Bryan!
No need to defend anything man. That graph is mega improvements everywhere. Who cares how much it makes at pk hp. Im sure car feels like a new one. Great job as usual Byran