TTP breaks in an Evo X GSR on the dyno 347whp, bone stock!
Jun 21, 2009 | 07:48 PM
#33
Evolved Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Jun 21, 2009 | 10:21 PM
#35
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
It is a fair system which is why it was invented. This way it levels the playing field from a car in the Northeast at 49*F and 9* humidity to a Southeast car at 101*F and 93% humidity.
All dynamometers should employ a SAE J1349 weather station correction reading so that the SAE standard can be maintained throughout the world.
Jun 22, 2009 | 03:56 PM
#36
WOW, thats one helluva dyno!
As others have said, who cares if the baseline is high, the gains are all that matters, good work!!!
Scorke
As others have said, who cares if the baseline is high, the gains are all that matters, good work!!!
Scorke
Last edited by scorke; Jun 22, 2009 at 03:58 PM.
Jun 22, 2009 | 05:08 PM
#37
i dont know...i have a friend with an evo 9. the only mods he had were like TBE, intake, MBC, spark plugs and a ttp tune and he is claiming 357whp on their dyno....and typically mustang dynos read low...
so something is fishy with the numbers im seeing at ttp, no offense...because evo 9's dont make 357whp with such minimal mods...
so something is fishy with the numbers im seeing at ttp, no offense...because evo 9's dont make 357whp with such minimal mods...
It made 355 actually
and before tune with the mods i made 278I ALSO RAN AN 11.80@117... so sounds about right??
Last edited by MattsT67; Jun 23, 2009 at 07:15 AM.
Jun 23, 2009 | 05:11 AM
#38
Seriously, I agree with lots of other posters and moderator. It doesn't really matter what the final figures are. It's the difference between the baseline and final that's important.
The uncorrected final figure is 321, which is still pretty damn good for a stock evo x. But most importantly, it gained 75 whp over baseline which is the most important figure of all. Granted, it's not out of line from various other good tuners but still a good gain.
This is my car. I've driven it for a week now with the tune and it's outstanding. Reliable, no error codes, no check engines, no hesitation or strange sounds throughout all the gears to redline. On top of that, these guys were great to work with - took time to explain a lot of stuff to a newb like me - and offers a very reasonable price for the work.
In short, as their ratings show - if you're in Central/Northern FL and you need a tune - check out TTP.
The uncorrected final figure is 321, which is still pretty damn good for a stock evo x. But most importantly, it gained 75 whp over baseline which is the most important figure of all. Granted, it's not out of line from various other good tuners but still a good gain.
This is my car. I've driven it for a week now with the tune and it's outstanding. Reliable, no error codes, no check engines, no hesitation or strange sounds throughout all the gears to redline. On top of that, these guys were great to work with - took time to explain a lot of stuff to a newb like me - and offers a very reasonable price for the work.
In short, as their ratings show - if you're in Central/Northern FL and you need a tune - check out TTP.
Jun 23, 2009 | 06:24 AM
#39
I'm going to stop by TTP today for a dyno pull. I was tuned on Cobb's MD in Plano Texas and I bet the numbers should be close when correcting for the weather and altitude difference.
Jun 25, 2009 | 07:08 AM
#41
With what's been said from moderators etc. about not bashing TTP and "de-railing" threads... I think a more appropriate action would be for the OP to not post "TTP breaks in an Evo X GSR on the dyno 347whp, bone stock!" titled threads but instead maybe "TTP breaks in an EVO X GSR on the dyno and gains 70whp, bone stock!".
As other have said, this is much more in line with what all other industry tuners are seeing on stock X's.
As other have said, this is much more in line with what all other industry tuners are seeing on stock X's.
Jun 25, 2009 | 08:02 AM
#42
With what's been said from moderators etc. about not bashing TTP and "de-railing" threads... I think a more appropriate action would be for the OP to not post "TTP breaks in an Evo X GSR on the dyno 347whp, bone stock!" titled threads but instead maybe "TTP breaks in an EVO X GSR on the dyno and gains 70whp, bone stock!".
As other have said, this is much more in line with what all other industry tuners are seeing on stock X's.
As other have said, this is much more in line with what all other industry tuners are seeing on stock X's.
There is no "correct" number of what industry tuners should see. I use a dyno that shows a stock X at 215whp. In the same way that TTP gets questioned about their numbers being high, I get a lot of "man, that dyno reads too low and sucks" crap. It gets old, dude.
I pour over these threads, and if you read the original posts, all the data is there. The baseline, the end result, the percentage of gain. It all lines up.
If you want to comment on how their dyno reads, this would be a good place to do it, as there is a good comparison to Cobb and some explanation: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...o-results.html
Cleaning up "that dyno reads too high" or "that dyno reads too low" posts in multiple threads sucks. I've left it alone many times, and they all turn into off topic pissing matches. They are about gains and tuning, not who's dyno reads higher than who else's.
Jun 25, 2009 | 08:36 AM
#43
Understood. I agree with you... dyno talk is lame. I just feel that some vendors try to create hype that may mislead prospective customers who don't read the fine print. Not saying TTP does at all... I just think more shops and people should focus on net gains, not final peak #'s.
I'm just as tired of it as anyone else. My car dyno'd 208 stock. I gained 102whp with AMS boltons and COBB AP Stage 2 shelf flash, putting the car at 310. People think that's low... until they go for a ride.
I'm just as tired of it as anyone else. My car dyno'd 208 stock. I gained 102whp with AMS boltons and COBB AP Stage 2 shelf flash, putting the car at 310. People think that's low... until they go for a ride.
Jun 25, 2009 | 02:08 PM
#45
I don't make it a habit of micromanaging people and telling them how to start threads.
There is no "correct" number of what industry tuners should see. I use a dyno that shows a stock X at 215whp. In the same way that TTP gets questioned about their numbers being high, I get a lot of "man, that dyno reads too low and sucks" crap. It gets old, dude.
I pour over these threads, and if you read the original posts, all the data is there. The baseline, the end result, the percentage of gain. It all lines up.
If you want to comment on how their dyno reads, this would be a good place to do it, as there is a good comparison to Cobb and some explanation: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...o-results.html
Cleaning up "that dyno reads too high" or "that dyno reads too low" posts in multiple threads sucks. I've left it alone many times, and they all turn into off topic pissing matches. They are about gains and tuning, not who's dyno reads higher than who else's.
There is no "correct" number of what industry tuners should see. I use a dyno that shows a stock X at 215whp. In the same way that TTP gets questioned about their numbers being high, I get a lot of "man, that dyno reads too low and sucks" crap. It gets old, dude.
I pour over these threads, and if you read the original posts, all the data is there. The baseline, the end result, the percentage of gain. It all lines up.
If you want to comment on how their dyno reads, this would be a good place to do it, as there is a good comparison to Cobb and some explanation: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...o-results.html
Cleaning up "that dyno reads too high" or "that dyno reads too low" posts in multiple threads sucks. I've left it alone many times, and they all turn into off topic pissing matches. They are about gains and tuning, not who's dyno reads higher than who else's.
Even that post you are refer is shows only, those two dynos read a "same" that's all. Nothing to do with dyno dynamics or dyno jet.
Dyno is a tool and where you see your gain. The numbers it gives you is irrelevant . You should concentrate on the gain its give you only.
These dyno threads are fun though, you can see the " i suppos to have a bigger d*&k i measured it" posts . Since with my tape measure said so
I love them