CFT Tuned Evo X 426whp on stock turbo
#61
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It isn't a thread about a dyno reading high. It is a thread about a guy posting his dyno numbers on a Dynojet. Why do you care so much that his numbers are a little high? 240-250 seems reasonable for a Dynojet and over 400 is certainly possible. Everyone here is so clouded by reading other dyno charts.
If you feel that you have pushed the stock turbo further than anyone else in the country can and you know EXACTLY what the limits are and can predict what it should make within a couple percent, then good for you.
If you feel that you have pushed the stock turbo further than anyone else in the country can and you know EXACTLY what the limits are and can predict what it should make within a couple percent, then good for you.
I know through testing this turbo on the same full bolt-on evo x with these fuels:
-VP Import (33psi)
-C-16 9(33psi)
-E-85(33.5psi)
-93 Octane(32psi)
426whp on an un-molested mustang dyno is impossible without a 50-75 shot of nitrous.
#62
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
I get ragged on daily with my threads, Murlo and I both know with cold hard data exactly how far a stock evo x turbo can be pushed.
I know through testing this turbo on the same full bolt-on evo x with these fuels:
-VP Import (33psi)
-C-16 9(33psi)
-E-85(33.5psi)
-93 Octane(32psi)
426whp on an un-molested mustang dyno is impossible without a 50-75 shot of nitrous.
I know through testing this turbo on the same full bolt-on evo x with these fuels:
-VP Import (33psi)
-C-16 9(33psi)
-E-85(33.5psi)
-93 Octane(32psi)
426whp on an un-molested mustang dyno is impossible without a 50-75 shot of nitrous.
I honestly don't care if people want to post up numbers that are a little out there, i am trying to make sure the community see's a graph and can compare it to others out there so they know what to expect from a said setup.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post