Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

JESTR does it again! 330hp/340tq (stock evo x)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 08:09 AM
  #31  
WTFchuck's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: tampa fl
whens jester going to be in town again?
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #32  
lex08gsr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: philadelphia
Those are sick numbers for a stock X!!!!!!!
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #33  
solarevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: orlando
Originally Posted by atombomb33
Without a baseline, these are just numbers and honestly don't really mean anything because there isn't a point of reference.

i agree !!
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 07:18 PM
  #34  
JaxRRevoX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by solarevo
i agree !!
x3, I know Jestr is the man but its good to have a baseline to know what you gained, yeah you can go off of other peoples #s but those #s aren't yours.

Before i got tuned by Mase on his Dyno dynamics with a K&N drop in and UICP it put down 242whp and final # was 312whp, gain of 70whp.

Last edited by JaxRRevoX; Dec 18, 2009 at 07:48 PM.
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 08:33 PM
  #35  
EVOOOOO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: New York
what does a stock x put down on this dyno?
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 09:27 AM
  #36  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Well this is believable but quite impressive. He should have gotten a baseline. Also, he's not just stock because he did turn up the boost to achieve those numbers.

Another way he can test to see if it really is a factory freak is to add exhaust, turn up the boost even more and see where he's at. If the car doesn't make much more whp then he just got the best tune he could get and the car is already reaching it's limits with the current tune and stock setup.

If he can get over 400whp with adding just meth/E85, exhaust, jacking up timing and more boost while remaining on the stock intercooler, intake, turbo, cams, etc.. then he has a factory freak.

Last edited by BOOSTEZ; Dec 19, 2009 at 09:32 AM.
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 09:32 AM
  #37  
mlomker's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Saint Paul
Originally Posted by BOOSTEZ
Well this is believable but quite impressive.
If he's running 93oct then I'd believe it. A well tuned X with basic bolt-ons will do 340 on MAP's Dynojet.

We all like to believe that our supporting bolt-ons add a lot to peak power, but they don't. Some improve the curve (cams), others make the power more consistent (fmic, radiator), others improve throttle response (uicp/licp, intake, throttle body), but peak power isn't helped a whole lot without major upgrades (fuel, turbo).

I've wasted a lot of money grabbing 1-2 hp gains. <shrug>

Last edited by mlomker; Dec 19, 2009 at 09:41 AM.
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #38  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by mlomker
If he's running 93oct then I'd believe it. A well tuned X with basic bolt-ons will do 340 on MAP's Dynojet.
The question is what basic bolt-ons? You obviously need more volumetric efficiency to produce more power. If you say basic bolt-ons, that opens up a wide range of possibilities and doesn't make it a factory freak.

We all like to believe that our supporting bolt-ons add a lot to peak power, but they don't. They add repeatability and long-term will make the car more reliable
Agreed.

but you can get almost the same peak numbers from a stock car.
Disagree.
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #39  
mlomker's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Saint Paul
Originally Posted by BOOSTEZ
The question is what basic bolt-ons?
A drop-in and the cheapest 3" tbe that money can buy is what I'd consider basic.

Disagree.
I've seen a number of these cars within 10hp of cars that have every overpriced, name-brand bolt-on that you'd care to name (e.g. my car).

If there's one lesson I've learned with this car it's that most aftermarket parts are for show. It'd be a lot cheaper to buy some designer clothes and just keep the hood shut at meets.

Last edited by mlomker; Dec 19, 2009 at 09:57 AM.
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 11:27 AM
  #40  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by mlomker
A drop-in and the cheapest 3" tbe that money can buy is what I'd consider basic.
That's relative. Basic bolt-ons include:

UICP
LICP
FMIC
Intake pipes
BOV
Boost controller
TBE
Cams

All of that will give some kind of power depending on how you use them.

I've seen a number of these cars within 10hp of cars that have every overpriced, name-brand bolt-on that you'd care to name (e.g. my car).
That is very true, but all cars are different too. Some make more power than others with just stock stuff on the car. Most aren't so lucky.

If there's one lesson I've learned with this car it's that most aftermarket parts are for show. It'd be a lot cheaper to buy some designer clothes and just keep the hood shut at meets.
Agree.
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 11:30 AM
  #41  
SHhhhh's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 1
From: FL
What did it put down on the baseline run?
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 05:31 PM
  #42  
mlomker's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Saint Paul
Originally Posted by BOOSTEZ
That's relative. Basic bolt-ons include:

UICP
LICP
FMIC
Intake pipes
BOV
Boost controller
TBE
Cams
You asked how I defined it. I'd call that full bolt-ons and then some.

My definition of 'basic' only includes what a non-mechanic with a basic set of tools could do in his/her garage. Cams wouldn't qualify and anything requiring an immediate re-tune for the car to function (fueling, a turbo) also would not.

Last edited by mlomker; Dec 19, 2009 at 05:36 PM.
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 11:29 PM
  #43  
BOOSTEZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by mlomker
You asked how I defined it. I'd call that full bolt-ons and then some.

My definition of 'basic' only includes what a non-mechanic with a basic set of tools could do in his/her garage. Cams wouldn't qualify and anything requiring an immediate re-tune for the car to function (fueling, a turbo) also would not.
Then you should disqualify turning up the boost because that's the only way you are going to get the big power gains.

We shouldn't fool ourselves into thinking the Evo X can make gobs of power without turning up the boost and tuning the car for it. And that is definitely a "basic bolt-on" part and is the part that makes the most power mod-wise outside of an upgraded turbo (which I don't consider a basic bolt-on either).

-M

Last edited by BOOSTEZ; Dec 19, 2009 at 11:31 PM.
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 07:31 AM
  #44  
Evo VIII 4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: Allentown PA
where is he located
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 08:29 AM
  #45  
mlomker's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Saint Paul
Originally Posted by BOOSTEZ
Then you should disqualify turning up the boost because that's the only way you are going to get the big power gains.
How far you can safely turn up the boost is directly related to what fuel you are running. In my mind it is the fuel that is adding power, the boost is sort of a 'supporting mod' that goes with the fuel.

I'll be the first to say that I'm a novice when it comes to motors, so I may not be thinking about it 100% right.

Last edited by mlomker; Dec 20, 2009 at 08:32 AM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:32 PM.